be bold. As you don't provide a 'bold
weight' face, browsers simulate the bolding artificially (and do a poop job in
some cases).
here is a test case:
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/ev-20111223.html
and a screen shot - from left: Safari, Opera, Firefox 9:
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/ev-20111223.png
I think this is a case of the Mac OS engine rendering fonts differently, period
as it always seems to be the case w Mac versus Windows OS.
Elli Vizcaino
Fwiw, the webfont renders just fine in Windows or OS X as far as I can
tell...
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/z/
~d
Fwiw, the webfont renders just fine in Windows or OS X as far as I can
tell...
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/z/
~d
Fine as in legible, sure but not identically. The appearance of fonts on Mac OS
tend to be slightly on the bolder side.
Elli Vizcaino
On 12/23/2011 5:43 PM, Elli Vizcaino wrote:
Fwiw, the webfont renders just fine in Windows or OS X as far as I can
tell...
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/z/
~d
Fine as in legible, sure but not identically. The appearance of fonts on Mac OS
tend to be slightly on the bolder side.
Elli
On Dec 24, 2011, at 3:25 AM, Elli Vizcaino wrote:
here is a test case:
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/ev-20111223.html
and a screen shot - from left: Safari, Opera, Firefox 9:
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/ev-20111223.png
Yes the Little Day font is of normal-weight, it's a free commercial font
