Someone wrote:
I would like to hear your thoughts/recommendations on Mobile
devices for clarification and advice?
I consider them for the most part more toys than tools. I own no
mobile device, and do not anticipate ever owning one. I leave here
infrequently. I've been fueling my car about
Den 10.04.2014 12:24, skrev Philip Taylor:
My thoughts regarding Mobile-first design is that it is putting
the cart before the horse -- we should (IMHO) (a) be designing to
W3C standards (and not designing to accommodate browser deficiencies),
and (b) be designing to be flexible (so that no
apr 102014 12:36 Georg ge...@gunlaug.com:
I agree in principle, but guess how much you play by the market, or not,
depends on whether you are trying to sell something, or not. :-)
FWIW, I have no first in mind when designing, only all...
Den 10.04.2014 12:59, skrev MiB:
What mobile first does is focusing on the content and the essential
presentation of it. Something all web design should be doing already.
That they should, regardless of how they approach visual design.
regards
Georg
Works fine in Android both portrait and landscape (centered on the
screen), and fine in iPhone portrait view, but in landscape view on an
iPhone the modal window is off to the lower right.
http://www.artofequinemassage.com/class-photos/
I tried making an adjustment to the CSS but don't have
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Debbie Campbell
d...@redkitecreative.com wrote:
Works fine in Android both portrait and landscape (centered on the screen),
and fine in iPhone portrait view, but in landscape view on an iPhone the
modal window is off to the lower right.
Thank you - I'll give that a try.
--
Debbie
On 4/10/2014 7:18 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Debbie Campbell
d...@redkitecreative.com wrote:
Works fine in Android both portrait and landscape (centered on the screen),
and fine in iPhone portrait view, but in
On 2014-04-10 11:24 (GMT+0100) Philip Taylor composed:
I cannot trace the original
That's one of the hazards of mailing lists that do not munge. The habit of
needing to reply specially instead of with a normal reply button can induce
someone receiving a private reply to a list post to
As with the previous authors, I also do not own/carry a mobile device. However,
our site visitors do. While I'm neutral overall on Mobile First vs. Desktop
First, I can say that going to a Mobile First style sheet reduced our overall
CSS by more than half. About 25% of our visitors are coming
Then you all can be happy carrying your pagers and listening to the latest
hit from Abba as well.
Mobile use is not a fad. It's not just something those whippersnappers
are doing, even if you're not. It is, for many, the first and sometimes
only web device they use. And it's use is growing
On 4/10/2014 10:33 AM, Chris Williams wrote:
Then you all can be happy carrying your pagers and listening to the latest
hit from Abba as well.
Mobile use is not a fad. It's not just something those whippersnappers
are doing, even if you're not. It is, for many, the first and sometimes
only
Thank you for your comments, Chris, which clearly contain a great
deal of sense. Let me, if I may, address just one part of what
you say, in terms of what I create (create, in terms of create
web sites, that is) --
The problem that mobile-first is trying to solve is an issue not simply
one of
This, too, is a place where we engineers try to pretend we are like our
users and, in doing so, often fail them. We all are comfortable with
technology, and feel that sure, let's let them customize the heck out of
this thing, give them a ton of options. Because we are comfortable with
lots of
Philip, as I described in the message I just sent, I too am developing a
very complex and detailed application where I was convinced that one
needed a huge screen to appreciate it. After many discussions with my
contract designer she was able to convince me that the mobile user was
worth
Typical text site : http://marden-prg.org.uk/
Typical graphic-dependent high-resolution site :
http://www.royalholloway.ac.uk/Hellenic-Institute/Research/Etheridge/
For what it's worth, a smart enough phone - like my iPhone - can render the
high resolution site mentioned above with
Also, we're drifting away from list appropriate topics...
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 10, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Chris Williams ch...@clwill.com wrote:
Philip, as I described in the message I just sent, I too am developing a
very complex and detailed application where I was convinced that one
apr 10 2014 16:19 Davies, Elizabeth elizabeth_dav...@gallup.com:
the Mobile First philosophy brought many wins with it. Perhaps the name is
misleading and it should be Simplicity First or Basics First
;D
I liked that one.
apr 10 2014 18:50 Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com:
it's still useable. He's not leaving mobile users *completely* out in the
cold.
That it is so is still quite a bit beside the point I think. The users only
have to get used to sites that cater for them, their use cases and their
devices,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Debbie Campbell
d...@redkitecreative.com wrote:
Works fine in Android both portrait and landscape (centered on the screen),
and fine in iPhone portrait view, but in landscape view on an iPhone the
modal window is off to the lower right.
I tried making an
Works fine on my iPhone 5.
Ken
On Thursday, April 10, 2014, Debbie Campbell d...@redkitecreative.com
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Debbie Campbell
d...@redkitecreative.com wrote:
Works fine in Android both portrait and landscape (centered on the
screen),
and fine in iPhone
I'm still experiencing the problem.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 10, 2014, at 9:37 PM, Debbie Campbell d...@redkitecreative.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Debbie Campbell
d...@redkitecreative.com wrote:
Works fine in Android both portrait and landscape (centered on the screen),
21 matches
Mail list logo
