A colleague of mine found a little bug in IE7 that produces an
unneeded horizontal scrollbar:
http://alastairc.ac/testing/IE7_bugs/scrolling_on_position-right.html
It seems to be tripped when you have:
- a block of over 50% wide, relatively positioned. (Including the body.)
- an absolutely
On 12/19/06, Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange. Seems to be a similar problem in IE6, but the wrapper is
expanding there.
I'm glad it wasn't something common that I had just missed before, but
it is very strange that this hasn't come up before, isn't it?
Especially since it affects IE6
Hi everyone,
A client had a strange behavior in IE7 RC1, where mousing over a link in
one column moved the right hand column off screen. A fairly obscure one
this, but at first glance it doesn't seem to equate to a current PIE bug.
I've just cut it down to a test case:
Hi Bernat,
Bernat Lleonart wrote:
I am creating a layout based in em's the box
is 100px wide in FF, but it is 99px wide in IE.
Only 1px difference? I'd expect that much from using percentages to do
the page width! That could easily be rounding error.
Felix might chip in that you shouldn't
Ingo Chao wrote:
The peekaboo, meaning content appearing and reappearing depending on
scroll, window rezise, the weather forecast, is fixed in IE7. The
problem you are reporting is not of that now you can see me, now you
don't kind.
Ah, thanks for that, I guess that's why I didn't find
Ingo Chao wrote:
In the end, these are just heads of Hydra, smash one, and two will grow.
Indeed, I tried creating a 'fix' page and made *all* the content
disappear by including a conditional comment...
http://alastairc.ac/testing/IE7_bugs/peekaboo_floats_04.html
-Alastair
Hi everyone,
Apologies if I missed it before, but has anyone else had problems with
peekaboo bugs in IE7?
I thought it had been fixed, so I was a little surprised to come across
it, and stripped it down to a test case:
http://alastairc.ac/testing/IE7_bugs/peekaboo_floats_01.html
Could someone
it working
in IE, which is what most people with visual impairments use (like the
general population).
Kind regards,
-Alastair
--
Alastair Campbell | Director of User Experience
Nomensa Email Disclaimer:
http://www.nomensa.com/email-disclaimer.html
/viewlist/css-discuss/74715
I look forward to when IE 6 does actually go the way of NN 4 (i.e.
vitually no usage), but until then we need a practical strategy.
Kind regards,
-Alastair
--
Alastair Campbell | Director of User Experience
Nomensa Email Disclaimer:
http://www.nomensa.com/email
I was just checking a few of the site's I look after in IE7's new beta,
and was a little worried that some appeared just as in IE6, which I
wasn't expecting.
The two odd ones out are on a 3rd party CMS that doesn't do the XML
declaration properly, and has a comment to kick IE6 into quirks mode.
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
I'm not sure if any browser supports E:empty decently.
FF appears to, but for things with literally nothing inside, e.g.
p/p. Perhaps also for just whitespace, but I'd need to check that.
AFAIK that's what the spec says, which is a shame, because then you
can't
diego nunes wrote:
Maybe... a *:not(*) - don't make much sense, but worth a try ;)
Thanks Diego,
I tried that, but no joy. :(
It applies to the *, which would be the image, but not the link, which
is where the padding background is applied.
Because the text doesn't count as something to
12 matches
Mail list logo