also sprach Ed Seehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.26.2205 +]:
> But I suggest it's better to do it by floating the li elements left.
> That's much more flexible for styling purposes, and if you do that you
> should make the a elements render as blocks as suggested in my
> original reply. B
On 1/26/07, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > li a {display: block;}
> If I do this, then the entire navigation bar will be horizontal all
> of a sudden:
I don't see why. All that rule says is that every a element inside an
li element should be displayed in block
also sprach Zoe M. Gillenwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.26.1952 +]:
> Give the ul the same amount of top and bottom padding. That's how
> padding works on inline elements -- it pushes out content to the left
> and right, but not above and below. The linebox doesn't expand to hold
> that
martin f krafft wrote:
> http://seamus.madduck.net/~madduck/abacons6/leistungen/1.html
> http://seamus.madduck.net/~madduck/abacons6/css/screen.css
>
> If you look at the top menu bar as well as the subcategories below
> the page's , you'll see how the vertical padding on the
> elements (as we
> "A" is an inline element and so of course rules designed for
> application to block elements won't work. Fortunately you can make
> them work with "display: block;" - for example
>
> li a {display: block;}
If I do this, then the entire navigation bar will be horizontal all
of
On 1/26/07, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear list,
> If you look at the top menu bar as well as the subcategories below
> the page's , you'll see how the vertical padding on the
> elements (as well as ) I was using to try to make the
> navigation bars a bit thicker doesn't actual
Dear list,
I am fighting with
http://seamus.madduck.net/~madduck/abacons6/leistungen/1.html
http://seamus.madduck.net/~madduck/abacons6/css/screen.css
If you look at the top menu bar as well as the subcategories below
the page's , you'll see how the vertical padding on the
elements (as well
