Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-16 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: Yeah, and the user who uses Lynx on Windows 95, I know I know… No you don't. Those who use Lynx will not be affected by font fall-back issues. In trying to ridicule my concern for the majority, you seem to fall back to strawman arguments from the 1990s. I

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-15 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: A modern OS / browser will do the job for you. But most users, or (to be cautious) at least a non-negligible share like 40% of users, seem to be using an OS / browser that in non-modern by your implicit definition. p { font-family: font-a, font-b, font-c, serif;}

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-15 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Jul 15, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: A modern OS / browser will do the job for you. But most users, or (to be cautious) at least a non-negligible share like 40% of users, seem to be using an OS / browser that in non-modern by your implicit

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-15 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: Usually you don't even know if the user has the font activated or not... :-). This is a little off-topic for CSS-D, but still pertinent, so I hope the question will be acceptable to most : is it possible, using JavaScript or otherwise, to interrogate the DOM to

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-14 Thread David Hucklesby
On 7/13/10 5:07 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: What I describe is actually the expected behaviour per CSS 2.1 /3-fonts… OK, even better news :-) Very many thanks. ** Phil. FWIW - That has been my experience with various language fonts--even when

[css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
If I have a page such as the following : !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd; html head meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 titleArmenian test/title style type=text/css

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Chris Blake
Hi, What about using CSS3 web fonts http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fontface/generator ? Upload the font you want, it will generate all the different types, link to them using the @fontface thing and bingo - they don't need that font on their system. or am I dreadfully mistaken? BR, CB On

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Chris Blake wrote: Hi, What about using CSS3 web fonts http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fontface/generator ? Upload the font you want, it will generate all the different types, link to them using the @fontface thing and bingo - they don't need that font on their system. or am I dreadfully

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Michael Adams
On Tuesday 13 July 2010 20:57, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: If I have a page such as the following : !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd; html head meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Michael Adams wrote: Would it help to create a page with all the Unicode chars in the range you are using and ask who can see how many based on font selections on a per paragraph basis. For *my* Linux Nimbus Roman No9 L may be a well populated serif font and Nimbus Sans L as sans serif

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Chris Blake
On 13/07/2010, at 6:38 PM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Michael Adams wrote: Would it help to create a page with all the Unicode chars in the range you are using and ask who can see how many based on font selections on a per paragraph basis. For *my* Linux Nimbus Roman No9 L

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Chris Blake wrote: On 13/07/2010, at 6:38 PM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: [T]he CSS fallback mechanism was formulated at a time when Unicode was not yet prevalent, and does not seem to have evolved to cope with the need to have greater control over the fallback font selected

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Michael Adams
On Tuesday 13 July 2010 23:02, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: I think that there is a great deal of unintentional racism in the US-English-centric web that we use today, but the last time a group of us tried to raise this as a serious issue within the CSS working group, one of the

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Michael Adams wrote: On Tuesday 13 July 2010 23:02, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: I think that there is a great deal of unintentional racism in the US-English-centric web that we use today, but the last time a group of us tried to raise this as a serious issue within the CSS

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Jul 13, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: I have presumably chosen my primary font not only because I feel its aesthetics are appropriate but also because it supports the necessary subset of Unicode to correctly display the characters that make up the page. But if

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: A modern OS / browser will do the job for you. [snip] Thank you, Phillipe : a very interesting summary. It is certainly useful to know what the behaviour of most current rendering engines is, but of course unless it is actually enshrined in the specification, one

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: What I describe is actually the expected behaviour per CSS 2.1 /3-fonts… OK, even better news :-) Very many thanks. ** Phil. __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread fantasai
On 07/13/2010 03:38 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Michael Adams wrote: Would it help to create a page with all the Unicode chars in the range you are using and ask who can see how many based on font selections on a per paragraph basis. For *my* Linux Nimbus Roman No9 L may

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
fantasai wrote: Was there something else you wanted? Dear Fantasai : many thanks for demonstrating that I was incorrect in my belief that the font-fallback mechanism has not evolved over time; I am extremely pleased that this is the case. As to whether there is anything else in this area

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread L. David Baron
On Tuesday 2010-07-13 09:57 +0100, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Is there, therefore, in CSS, some way of specifying as a part of the font fallback sequence that any font selected as a result of fallback must support a specific subset of Unicode such that the page can be guaranteed

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread Bob Rosenberg
At 8:51 PM +0900 on 07/13/2010, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote about Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode: A modern OS / browser will do the job for you. You can specify a fallback font if your first choice is not available: p { font-family: font-a, font-b, font-c, serif;} Gecko, WebKit, Opera

Re: [css-d] Fonts, fall-backs Unicode

2010-07-13 Thread fantasai
On 07/13/2010 12:45 PM, Bob Rosenberg wrote: The problem is two fold (in my opinion). First is that unlike with printing use, there is no Font of Last Resort fall-back. That support says to use the defined font BUT if there are glyphs in the text which are not in the font then to attempt to