Re: [css-d] Question about validation

2006-03-13 Thread David Dorward
On 13/03/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > #footer a:link { >background-color : transparent; >color : #ff; > } > I use the W3C CSS Validation and it gives the warning; > > Line : 211 (Level : 1) You have no background-color with your color : > #footer a:link > > And y

Re: [css-d] Question about validation

2006-03-13 Thread Tony Crockford
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have the following; > > #footer a:link { >background-color : transparent;color : #ff; } > > I use the W3C CSS Validation and it gives the warning; > > Line : 211 (Level : 1) You have no background-color with your color : > #footer a:link > > And y

Re: [css-d] Question about validation

2006-03-13 Thread ian
Tony Crockford wrote: > As a side issue, why declare it as transparent when transparent is the > default? (topstyle user? - BTDT ;o) ) My guess would be that it overrides the normal a:link setting which might indeed have a background color?

Re: [css-d] Question about validation

2006-03-13 Thread Olly Hodgson
On 13/03/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And yet there is a background-color, it's just transparent. I understand > that it is only a warning, but does the validator not recognize > transparent as a color? I have several of the background-color warnings, > but I am supposing th

[css-d] Question about validation

2006-03-13 Thread jblanchard
I have the following; #footer a:link { background-color : transparent; color : #ff; } I use the W3C CSS Validation and it gives the warning; Line : 211 (Level : 1) You have no background-color with your color : #footer a:link And yet there is a background-color, it's just transparen

Re: [css-d] question about validation/xhtml problems

2005-06-12 Thread Richard Grevers
On 6/13/05, Paul Seale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.mccahongroup.com > > What am I missing? Some of the stuff with javascript I find fascinating - > but the P elements being "undefined" makes no sense to me. XHTML plays by XML rules element and attribute name

Re: [css-d] question about validation/xhtml problems

2005-06-12 Thread Prabhath Sirisena
> What am I missing? Some of the stuff with javascript I find fascinating - > but the P elements being "undefined" makes no sense to me. You are using XHTML, so you have to specify elements and attributes in lowercase. You'll have to replace the UL and P elements with ul and p. XHTML Spec: http:/

Re: [css-d] question about validation/xhtml problems

2005-06-12 Thread david
Paul Seale wrote: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.mccahongroup.com What am I missing? Some of the stuff with javascript I find fascinating - but the P elements being "undefined" makes no sense to me. Hmm, aren't all tags in XHTML supposed to be lowercase? Maybe that's what it's complain

[css-d] question about validation/xhtml problems

2005-06-12 Thread Paul Seale
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.mccahongroup.com What am I missing? Some of the stuff with javascript I find fascinating - but the P elements being "undefined" makes no sense to me. Thanks in advance. Paul Seale __ css-d