Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Gabriele Romanato
Thanks guys! I have to make some further tests, actually. The potential of these new CSS3 features is so vast that you never stop finding new solutions. :-) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/ http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English)

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Kevin A. Cameron wrote: This raises an interesting question: the reflected text in HTML or CSS? I'd argue that the reflection is decoration and only decoration, and thus part of the stylesheet. On Apr 16, 2011, at 3:16 AM, Tim Climis wrote: Really, to get the

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Ingo Chao
Am Samstag, 16. April 2011 schrieb Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com: On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Kevin A. Cameron wrote: This raises an interesting question: the reflected text in HTML or CSS? I'd argue that the reflection is decoration and only decoration, and thus part of the

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Ingo Chao wrote: Some hate the effect [1], therefore, it is decoration. Some hate coz, gonna and 'fess up, but they are still (sadly) only too often a part of the content :-( Philip Taylor __ css-discuss

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Alan Gresley
On 16/04/2011 10:08 PM, Ingo Chao wrote: Am Samstag, 16. April 2011 schrieb Philippe Wittenberghe...@l-c-n.com: On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Kevin A. Cameron wrote: This raises an interesting question: the reflected text in HTML or CSS? I'd argue that the reflection is decoration and only

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Barney Carroll
On 16 April 2011 08:38, Gabriele Romanato gabriele.roman...@gmail.com wrote: The potential of these new CSS3 features is so vast that you never stop finding new solutions. :-) …new solutions to your OSX desktop in DHTML perhaps? Chucking this in for the dock items could be a laugh: li {

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Barney Carroll
Alan, a few points to make in response to your post, with inherently dynamic CSS in mind: On 16 April 2011 13:55, Alan Gresley a...@css-class.com wrote: Another question is what else is possible with CSS? I presume some would believe that CSS animation with a little JS is outright abuse of CSS.

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread tedd
At 6:44 PM +0200 4/15/11, Gabriele Romanato wrote: Again, what's the purpose of CSS3? Having fun with CSS: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/04/pure-css-reflection-effect.html The purpose of having fun with CSS is testing, the purpose of CSS testing is make something of your spare time during

[css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-15 Thread Gabriele Romanato
Again, what's the purpose of CSS3? Having fun with CSS: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/04/pure-css-reflection-effect.html The purpose of having fun with CSS is testing, the purpose of CSS testing is make something of your spare time during a dull day when you've finished to work on your

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-15 Thread David Laakso
On 4/15/11 12:44 PM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: Again, what's the purpose of CSS3? http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/04/pure-css-reflection-effect.html Fwiw, some captures... http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=549084 ~d -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-15 Thread Gabriele Romanato
thanks guys! for IE9: -ms-transform: rotate(-180deg); btw, I'm waiting for IE4Mac... :-) On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:16 PM, David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.comwrote: On 4/15/11 12:44 PM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: Again, what's the purpose of CSS3?

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-15 Thread Charles Miller
On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:16 PM, David Laakso wrote: Fwiw, some captures... http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=549084 ~d Am I right that none of them look like a true reflection would look? That the bottom image is in no cases a vertical flip of the top image? It challenges my

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-15 Thread Tim Climis
Message- From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d- boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Charles Miller Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 1:58 PM To: css-discuss discuss Subject: Re: [css-d] Reflection effect On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:16 PM, David Laakso wrote: Fwiw

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-15 Thread Alan Gresley
On 16/04/2011 4:16 AM, Tim Climis wrote: Yeah... I was about to point out the same thing. A 180 degree rotation is not the same as a vertical reflection. The e should be below the e, not the s. Really, to get the desired effect, you'd want transform: scaley(-1); It works in webkit. Haven't

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-15 Thread Kevin A. Cameron
This raises an interesting question: the reflected text in HTML or CSS? Arguments could be made both ways: In CSS is good as it is a visual flourish (not content). In HTML is good as then it keeps the CSS generic/reusable. Perhaps this is a good use of an inline style (for the