From: Dave M G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://formever.org
IE6 is dead to me now.
While this is certainly your, and your clients choice not to support IE6, it
seems a little shortsighted. I'd to point out just a couple of things.
First, there are undoubtedly many, many people who _cannot_ run IE7
Lori, David, CSS-d,
Thank you very much for your comments, and taking the time to be so
helpful. If it's not too much to bear, I have some follow up questions.
FWIW, a level 2 heading is missing.
I'm sorry, what does this mean?
Ditch the validation buttons?
Really? I tried to make them
Dave M G [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:08:25 -0500, wrote:
Site looks OK in the browsers listed below.
To stop the design breaking below 400px, you might consider giving the
body both a min-width: x; where x is a sufficient number of pixels to
hold the page unbroken. You could use
Dave M G wrote:
Lori, David, CSS-d,
Thank you very much for your comments, and taking the time to be so
helpful. If it's not too much to bear, I have some follow up questions.
FWIW, a level 2 heading is missing.
I'm sorry, what does this mean?
RE: http://formever.org
It is called
On 2007/04/26 12:55 (GMT+0900) Dave M G apparently typed:
I've settled on a design that I'm happy with, and I'd like to invite
people to make comments, both technical and artistic.
http://formever.org
As far as technical commentary goes:
It should display correctly in FireFox. I'm using
David L, David G,Felix,
Thank you for your clarifications and comments.
David L:
There is no h2 now, but there will be lots of h2 in dynamic content,
so I think that's okay.
Fair point about the validation buttons. The theory is, though, that the
site will validate, so hopefully those nit
On 2007/04/26 13:02 (GMT-0400) Dave M G apparently typed:
After I posted my last message, I took a look at the prices for the
browser viewing service. Definitely out of my price range. I guess I'll
just have to keep politely asking here on this list for help...
Running Linux need not be an
Dave M G wrote:
David L, David G,Felix,
After I posted my last message, I took a look at the prices for the
browser viewing service. Definitely out of my price range. I guess
I'll just have to keep politely asking here on this list for help...
OK. Don't wait for my offer to let you know
I am new to this list so I'm not sure about the scope of a site
check may be or not be, but personally I don't care for the design in
general.
Interesting the comments in relates posts about forward looking,
when the design itself is not.
Holly Bergevin wrote:
From: Dave M G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://formever.org
IE6 is dead to me now.
If you mean that in the sense that IE6 won't be getting any more bug
fixes to address CSS-related problems, that's fine.
While this is certainly your, and your clients choice not to support
Jasper,
Thank you for responding.
I am new to this list so I'm not sure about the scope of a site
check may be or not be, but personally I don't care for the design in
general.
Can you be more specific about what it is you don't like? I'd be very
interested to hear a negative critique of the
CSS-d,
I've settled on a design that I'm happy with, and I'd like to invite
people to make comments, both technical and artistic.
The site is here:
http://formever.org
As far as technical commentary goes:
It should display correctly in FireFox. I'm using Linux, so I'd be happy
to hear from
Dave M G wrote:
CSS-d,
I've settled on a design that I'm happy with, and I'd like to invite
people to make comments, both technical and artistic.
The site is here:
http://formever.org
FWIW, a level 2 heading is missing.
Ditch the validation buttons?
A little slow loading the image.
You
~davidLaakso wrote:
Dave M G wrote:
CSS-d,
I've settled on a design that I'm happy with, and I'd like to invite
people to make comments, both technical and artistic.
The site is here:
http://formever.org
FWIW, a level 2 heading is missing.
Ditch the validation buttons?
A
14 matches
Mail list logo
