tedd wrote:
> Limiting colors these days is pointless. I would suggest that the
> Government of Canada spend it's time and resources on things that
> matter? After all, the Government of Canada did waste it's time
> enforcing "web-safe" colors which were anything but web-safe. Now,
> they want
At 10:17 PM + 1/23/07, Dave Goodchild wrote:
>I don't think that many designers worry about web-safe colours these days -
>and even back in the day according to some articles the REAL web-safe
>pallette was much less than 216 colours. But these days I think it's pretty
>much a redundant approac
I don't think that many designers worry about web-safe colours these days -
and even back in the day according to some articles the REAL web-safe
pallette was much less than 216 colours. But these days I think it's pretty
much a redundant approach. Go for sRGB.
_
On 23/01/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Government of Canada has issued its second version of its Common Look and
> Feel Guidelines, and lo and behold they're mandating a CSS-driven design for
> all GoC websites!
>
> They have even dropped support for web-safe colours, but
The Government of Canada has issued its second version of its Common Look and
Feel Guidelines, and lo and behold they're mandating a CSS-driven design for
all GoC websites!
They have even dropped support for web-safe colours, but they are now mandating
that all colours on GoC websites conform t
