Re: [css-d] give a solution for font family and size

2008-03-02 Thread david
Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > david wrote: > >> But what's the point of using >> things like the tag when you're using CSS? It just seems >> sloppy to me, like something that my employer's ancient enterprise >> content management system might spit out. > > You just gave a partial answer to your ques

Re: [css-d] give a solution for font family and size

2008-02-29 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
david wrote: > But what's the point of using > things like the tag when you're using CSS? It just seems > sloppy to me, like something that my employer's ancient enterprise > content management system might spit out. You just gave a partial answer to your question. When working with legacy page

Re: [css-d] give a solution for font family and size

2008-02-28 Thread Michael Adams
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:29:26 -1000 david wrote: > Rob Emenecker wrote: > >> No, it is not correct at all. There is no such requirement > >anywhere. > > > > Being "correct" does not mean there "must" exist a requirement, as > > your argument implies. If there is no requirement one way or the > > o

Re: [css-d] give a solution for font family and size

2008-02-28 Thread david
Rob Emenecker wrote: >> No, it is not correct at all. There is no such requirement anywhere. > > Being "correct" does not mean there "must" exist a requirement, as your > argument implies. If there is no requirement one way or the other, then > having a FONT tag is as correct as not having a FONT

Re: [css-d] give a solution for font family and size

2008-02-28 Thread Rob Emenecker
> No, it is not correct at all. There is no such requirement anywhere. Being "correct" does not mean there "must" exist a requirement, as your argument implies. If there is no requirement one way or the other, then having a FONT tag is as correct as not having a FONT tag. There's no "requirement"

Re: [css-d] give a solution for font family and size

2008-02-28 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
david wrote: > Jukka K. Korpela wrote: >> Tudor Hariton wrote: >> >>> If you use CSS the sequence /* >>> */must not be written in you html code... >> >> That's incorrect. The use of CSS does not affect the least the issue >> what you are allowed to write in your HTML code. Some people and >> organ

Re: [css-d] give a solution for font family and size

2008-02-28 Thread david
Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > Tudor Hariton wrote: > >> If you use CSS the sequence /* */must >> not be written in you html code... > > That's incorrect. The use of CSS does not affect the least the issue > what you are allowed to write in your HTML code. Some people and > organizations, including

Re: [css-d] give a solution for font family and size

2008-02-27 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
Tudor Hariton wrote: > If you use CSS the sequence /* */must > not be written in you html code... That's incorrect. The use of CSS does not affect the least the issue what you are allowed to write in your HTML code. Some people and organizations, including the W3C, say that you should not use s

Re: [css-d] give a solution for font family and size

2008-02-27 Thread Tudor Hariton
Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > parameswaran marimuthu wrote: > > >> * >> > href="`readMoreURL`">`spotLightTitle` >> >> *some text here* >> >> >> > > There is no CSS code in your snippet. On the contrary, it uses > presentational HTML marku

Re: [css-d] give a solution for font family and size

2008-02-27 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
parameswaran marimuthu wrote: > * >href="`readMoreURL`">`spotLightTitle` > > *some text here* > > There is no CSS code in your snippet. On the contrary, it uses presentational HTML markup for things that are handled in CSS in modern appr

[css-d] give a solution for font family and size

2008-02-27 Thread parameswaran marimuthu
Hi friends I have the problem plz hepl me to find a solution *Here is that problem * `spotLightTitle` *some text here* it is displaing results good ,but some times one more * *has been come inside of paragraph tag(like this )so my style wi