[css-d] Simple problem but can't seem to find a solution

Hi guys, I have a div with an repeated-x background image. This all works fine in FF but IE seems to add unwanted padding to the bottom of the image; thus leaving a white gap! Anyone have an idea about how to fix it (can't seem to find anything on the net)? Thanks, Henry

Re: [css-d] Simple problem but can't seem to find a solution

Henry Felton wrote: Hi guys, I have a div with an repeated-x background image. This all works fine in FF but IE seems to add unwanted padding to the bottom of the image; thus leaving a white gap! Anyone have an idea about how to fix it (can't seem to find anything on the net)? Hi Henry, No

Re: [css-d] simple problem?

Don - HtmlFixIt.com wrote: Peter Lloyd wrote: Guys, thanks for the suggestions... The problem with clear: left; used in the main content area is that it not only clears the image, but also the bottom of the search box in the left-had column! So I guess the question then becomes can I stop

[css-d] simple problem?

Hi, Is it possible to force text to go below floated elements? I have an image floated left with some related text flowing to the right. But I want to begin the next section of text below the floated image and tight to the left margin (see 1). At the moment the next section of text simply

Re: [css-d] simple problem?

Is it possible to force text to go below floated elements? I have an image floated left with some related text flowing to the right. But I want to begin the next section of text below the floated image and tight to the left margin (see 1). At the moment the next section of text simply

Re: [css-d] simple problem?

Peter Lloyd wrote: Is it possible to force text to go below floated elements? Is there any way to guarantee that 'Next section' always begins below the image floated left (even if the size of the image varies on different pages? Yes, at least three ways. 1: declare 'clear: both' or

Re: [css-d] simple problem?

Subject: [css-d] simple problem? Hi, Is it possible to force text to go below floated elements? I have an image floated left with some related text flowing to the right. But I want to begin the next section of text below the floated image and tight to the left margin (see 1). At the moment

Re: [css-d] simple problem?

Peter Lloyd wrote: http://design.open.ac.uk/individual_pages/jeff_johnson/people_jeff_johnson.htm ... So I guess the question then becomes can I stop the interaction between the floated elements in the left column and the clearing elements in the main content area? Complete isolation is

Re: [css-d] simple problem - difficult solution

Ron Adams wrote: I have 2 divs on a page, and the top one is an unknown size, the bottom one must fill the rest of the space to the bottom of the browser window. How do I do this with CSS? A simplyfied example below. You can't. Divs expand to the height of their content (plus padding and

Re: [css-d] simple problem - difficult solution

On 8/30/05, Bob Easton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ron Adams wrote: I have 2 divs on a page, and the top one is an unknown size, the bottom one must fill the rest of the space to the bottom of the browser window. How do I do this with CSS? A simplyfied example below. You can't. Divs

RE: [css-d] simple problem - difficult solution

This[1] is a real issue and one that should have been addressed by the CSS spec. Setting a table to 100% high in IE in quirks mode makes the table the height of the screen, a really useful feature. This isn't available in standards mode, and there is *no* equivalent in a tableless design. No

Re: [css-d] simple problem - difficult solution

No need for quirks mode, I don't think. Set html,body{height:100%} (as well as your table) and you should be good to go in standards mode. Hmmm why does html and body need a height? That is surely a hack. I'll let others reply to the more specific height details of CSS, as I can get

Re[2]: [css-d] simple problem - difficult solution

Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 10:00:05 AM, andrew welch wrote: Hmmm why does html and body need a height? That is surely a hack. Explanation: http://www.quirksmode.org/css/100percheight.html The requirement is that the header div must not scroll off the page, it should remain fixed at the

Re: [css-d] simple problem - difficult solution

At 3:00 PM +0100 8/30/05, andrew welch wrote: No need for quirks mode, I don't think. Set html,body{height:100%} (as well as your table) and you should be good to go in standards mode. Hmmm why does html and body need a height? That is surely a hack. Or, you know... not. Ok,

Re: [css-d] simple problem - difficult solution

Ok, I'll throw it open to the CSS experts. Two divs: divHeader/div divlots of content/div The requirement is that the header div must not scroll off the page, it should remain fixed at the top of the page. The content div will fill with content and should be scrollable vertically when

Re: [css-d] simple problem - difficult solution

divHeader/div divlots of content/div The requirement is that the header div must not scroll off the page, it should remain fixed at the top of the page. The content div will fill with content and should be scrollable vertically when needed. Anne van Kesteren post on fixed positioning with

[css-d] simple problem - difficult solution

I have 2 divs on a page, and the top one is an unknown size, the bottom one must fill the rest of the space to the bottom of the browser window. How do I do this with CSS? A simplyfied example below. __ css-discuss [EMAIL