Hi Ingo,
Thanks a lot for looking into this issue further.
> I don't secure the doctrine that an additional wrapper div would be bad
> practice, a strong sign of divitis, or whatever.
You are absolutely right, and I agree with you in this matter: there's
nothing wrong with one wrapper div in the
matthijs abeelen wrote:
That's an issue I have been thinking about too. As i started learning
css I just assumed a container div was a necessity in the standard
fixed-width 750px layouts. It's hard to find a site that doesn't use
one.
Untill I found these examples/articles:
http://jero.net/archi
That's an issue I have been thinking about too. As i started learning
css I just assumed a container div was a necessity in the standard
fixed-width 750px layouts. It's hard to find a site that doesn't use
one.
Untill I found these examples/articles:
http://jero.net/archive/2005/06/03/yes-the-html
Donna stated:
> well, I'd say it's kind of like bringing home the groceries - if you've
> got a car, then why use bags? --because it is easier to take them manage
> the groceries - taking them inside, organizing different types of
> groceries, keeping them cold...
>
LOL! Being a mom of 5 childre
4css wrote:
This just came up today on a forum I visit, question was in regards to using
a container/wrapper when doing your designs, if so, what would the reasons
be, if not why not, is this just for certain layouts, fixed and fluid, just
fixed, just floats etc..
well, I'd say it's kind
This just came up today on a forum I visit, question was in regards to using
a container/wrapper when doing your designs, if so, what would the reasons
be, if not why not, is this just for certain layouts, fixed and fluid, just
fixed, just floats etc..
One answer was that inexperienced CSS'ers
