Il giorno 27/dic/05, alle ore 23:01:05, Paul Walker ha scritto:
> Also is "padding: 0 0 0 9px;" ever treated
> differently than "padding-top: 0; padding-right: 0; padding-bottom: 0;
> padding-left: 9px;" ?
>
> Thanks,
> ~PJ
It's exactly the same one
--
ilduca69
XHTML+CSS
http://ilduca69.alterv
g-bottom: 0;
padding-left: 9px;" ?
Thanks,
~PJ
- Original Message -
From: "{tonyFelice}" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'{tonyFelice}'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Paul Walker'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, De
2005 2:31 PM
To: 'Paul Walker'
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] width: 100%, < 100% in IE
All the padding left and right is inherited down, for a combined total of
92px at any width.
This creates a fix, but moves the subnav over 92:
#menu ul {
ED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 1:21 PM
Subject: RE: [css-d] width: 100%, < 100% in IE
> Paul,
>
> I'm sorry I forgot about the scrollbars.
>
> Is the extra space always 92px for you? That's what it seems to be for
me,
> and it's very odd, and to me,
: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 1:41 PM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] width: 100%, < 100% in IE
The problem with your proposed solution is that 1) it creates a horizontal
scroll bar in the browser and 2) if the window is resized small enough, the
original problem resurfa
Paul Walker wrote:
> I would
> greatly appreciate it if someone could explain to me why.
I have tried my very best in your last thread. At what point do you
have a specific question?
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
css?
Thanks,
~PJ
- Original Message -
From: "{tonyFelice}" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Paul Walker'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 12:25 PM
Subject: RE: [css-d] width: 100%, < 100% in IE
> Paul,
>
> I don
