Erik Harris wrote:
> At 05:09 PM 12/1/2007, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
>> So, I would give browsers a complete Acid Stress Test, and hide
>> same test from weaker browser and provide them with an alternative.
>>
> Aside from MSIE, how do you do this? You can use the MS-proprietary
> commented "if" s
- Original Message -
From: DAVOUD TOHIDY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, December 1, 2007 9:03 pm
Subject: Re: [css-d] How will firefox 3 affect web developers?
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
> >The differences at the moment seems to be one of "presenting a
> building>structure (desi
DAVOUD TOHIDY wrote:
> on Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 20:55:44 +0100 George wrote:
>
>
>> One type of building - mostly rigid ones, yes...
>>
>
> Well it seems now you are talking about an environment
> that I know :) .
>
Well, that's nice. But frankly, you and your environment bore me.
on Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 20:55:44 +0100 George wrote:
> One type of building - mostly rigid ones, yes...
Well it seems now you are talking about an environment
that I know :) .
But no you are absolutely wrong. It does not matter If a
building is flexible or rigid, it will have a structure cr
At 05:09 PM 12/1/2007, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
>So, I would give browsers a complete Acid Stress Test, and hide same
>test from weaker browser and provide them with an alternative.
Aside from MSIE, how do you do this? You can use the MS-proprietary
commented "if" statements to provide alternate ma
On Nov 30, 2007 2:57 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anthony Ettinger wrote:
> > http://chovy.dyndns.org/test/img/tab.html
> >
> > I'm trying to accomplish "Good", but am only able to get "Bad" as
> > shown in the link above.
> >
> > I'm looking for a "bullet proof" method, that wil
Erik Harris wrote:
> Your advice is _generally_ true, since browsers _generally_ ignore
> stuff they don't understand, but extreme examples like the Acid
> Stress Test show that your advice doesn't _always_ hold. If you get
> fancy enough with standards-compliant code, some browsers won't
> s
Rafael wrote:
> Maybe we're talking about different things here. What I understand
> here would be basically the same as saying that the standards
> shouldn't exist and, though interpreting the same content /
> instructions, each browser should render it its own way.
Standards are defined for
Hi Tina,
Give Stu Nichols CSS Play a shot:
http://www.cssplay.co.uk/menu/form on this page
underneath the form, there are other links to
different styles done to forms by other
designer/authors.
Elli
--- Yoyo Etc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am about to revamp a long form I created a while
DAVOUD TOHIDY wrote:
>> I think someone is defining "site stability" on the wrong
>> premises
>
> Well if you are refering it to me, I never did define "site
> stability".
I was _only_ referring to arguments and wording in the mail I responded
to. Erik H. used your response as base for his
I am about to revamp a long form I created a while ago and I want to
use CSS to style it. This will be my first form styled with CSS.
Does anyone have any good online resources they can point me to that
show how to do this?
I have a book that briefly talks about it but apparently IE6 doesn't
take
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
>>> http://www.bildas.fatpawdesign.com/index.html
> Made change as recommended. Would appreciate another check.
Working just fin in IE6 (on w2k).
> Can I just take out those particular 'position' declarations out all
> together?
Yes, that _should_ automatically take it
I hope this time will work :)
goerge wrote:
> > I think someone is defining "site stability" on the wrong premises
Well if you are refering it to me, First of all I never did define "site
stability".I did define "Layout stability" though. Now let me give you an
example tomake it clear wh
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
> Curiosity killed the cat...
> -- Molly 'the cat' :-)
Don't worry, they have lives to spare :)
[···]
> Content being the same doesn't mean users get to or want to see it in
> the same way across the board, and that is often the reason why users
> learn about browser
Subject: Re: [css-d] site-check please, major ie6 issues
> Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
>> http://www.bildas.fatpawdesign.com/index.html
>
> Probably too much 'hasLayout' for IE6' liking already :-)
>
> IE6 seems to have serious stacking-problems, and there's too many
> 'stacking-correctors' in ther
I have made the relevant changes as suggested ...
Could I have a site check and cross browser test.
Is it possible to overcome the following css validation error?
/* ie6 positioning defect causes 1px error when parent has odd height */
221 Lexical error at line 221, column 60. Encountered: "%"
Thanks Georg. I did check that, and set my width to "auto" (it was 100%)
and it didn't make any difference.
In summary, I have a "shell" div, which contains a header, menu, and content
div. In the print style sheet, I set the menu and header to "none". I was
focusing my print efforts on the c
On Dec 1, 2007, at 11:56 PM, Jan Christian Anker wrote:
> http://www.putti.no
>
> Now, clean cache, cookies, etc and open the page in
> FF 2.0.0.10 or FF 2.0.0.11. You will notice that
> the menu is not displaying properly (main menu line
> above display area, only partly visible).
Happens, yes
At 02:07 AM 12/1/2007, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
>No typo, but rather a reaction to the "lowest common denominator"
>design-approach I responded to. I rarely ever see sites the way they are
>designed - "stable" or not. I don't expect them to, and the mentioned
>approach doesn't help one bit on the end-
Here is something interesting (Operating System is
Win XP 2002 Svp 2):
First open http://www.putti.no in IE 7.0, you should
see a page that displays OK.
Now, clean cache, cookies, etc and open the page in
FF 2.0.0.10 or FF 2.0.0.11. You will notice that
the menu is not displaying properly (main
Marje Cannon wrote:
> For some reason, the values within the form fields are too high in FF, but
> not IE... does anyone have a clue why this is happening.
>
> http://www.webdesignsarasota.com/contact.php
>
> The stylesheet is located here
>
> http://www.webdesignsarasota.com/styles-webdesignsar
21 matches
Mail list logo