Bob Rosenberg wrote:
Which responds with a blanket NO ignoring the possibility that
there may be layouts that can be done via Tables but is impossible to
create via CSS.
That possibility doesn't exist.
The only thing that may bother us a bit at times, is legacy browsers
that don't support
At 10:33 PM -0400 8/1/09, Bob Rosenberg wrote:
Except for the fact that in some cases CSS is (currently?) incapable
of creating the same layout as can be created with a Table (Maybe
CSS3 will be able to once it gets rolled out in a few years).
That's news to me.
I've been wandering around for
Tedd post toasted:
I've been wandering around for years using css
to solve every styling problem I've run into
and have never found one I couldn't solve.
It does take some creativity and ingenuity to create some of the complex
layouts with CSS... but that is what listservs like this one
At 3:41 PM + 8/2/09, Conyers, Dwayne wrote:
Tedd post toasted:
I've been wandering around for years using css
to solve every styling problem I've run into
and have never found one I couldn't solve.
It does take some creativity and ingenuity to create some of the
complex layouts with
I'm using an unordered list to display the footer information for this page:
http://preview.sonjara.com/omep/new/template_rtl.htm
(see http://preview.sonjara.com/omep/new/template.htm for the English,
whose padding works fine).
The links with the trouble are the text links at the bottom, just
Bob Rosenberg wrote:
At 19:36 +0100 on 08/01/2009, MEM wrote about Re: [css-d] the old
'tables vs. divs':
I was studying the CSS and the page structure and I noticed that
the designer used a series of table cels to create that design.
Not only will the page not validate but I wondered what
Anne E. Shroeder wrote:
I'm using an unordered list to display the footer information for this page:
http://preview.sonjara.com/omep/new/template_rtl.htm
Anne
Not tested. Try:
#footer ul { border: 1px solid red;
margin: 0 auto; -- :: delete
margin: 0; -- :: add
