Thank you all for your replies, again.:) I needed some time to test and
think a little...
1)
If we apply overflow property here, will this property
be inherited to descendants even without being declared
on them as inherit ?
see
Hello all,
It appears that MS has hacked in bidirection (somewhat improved over
IE7) by the use of *hasLayout*.
http://css-class.com/test/bugs/ie/ie8-haslayout-bidi.htm
Will they ever cease to make us wonder.
--
Alan http://css-class.com/
Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. -
It appears that MS has hacked in bidirection (somewhat improved over
IE7) by the use of *hasLayout*.
http://css-class.com/test/bugs/ie/ie8-haslayout-bidi.htm
Hi Alan,
In what build?
The first examples look good to me in IE8 (8.0.7600.16385), but using IE8
via IE tester I do see the issues
2010/3/7 Benoit Favreault b...@provokat.ca
we need to remove the overflow:hidden; declarations, may I presume that,
on
this case, this is not the proper hasLayout trigger to sue?
In your opinion, what effective hasLayout trigger can be used here?
On floats, display : inline is a good
It appears that MS has hacked in bidirection (somewhat improved over
IE7) by the use of *hasLayout*.
http://css-class.com/test/bugs/ie/ie8-haslayout-bidi.htm
Hi Alan,
In what build?
The first examples look good to me in IE8 (8.0.7600.16385), but using
IE8
via IE tester I do see
2010/3/7 Benoit Favreault b...@provokat.ca
we need to remove the overflow:hidden; declarations, may I presume
that,
on
this case, this is not the proper hasLayout trigger to sue?
In your opinion, what effective hasLayout trigger can be used here?
On floats, display : inline is a
Michael Stevens said:
My point was that, stricly semantically speaking (real semantics not web
semantics), most tags are used to change the way a browser presents text to
the reader. That is PRESENTATTIONAL by definition.
By you and in your head, yes, that's possible. But the joke is on you.
Alan Gresley blurted out:
The built-in defaults ARE CSS. It's the CSS the browsermakers decided
to have builtin. Technically, this is the case with Firefox anyway.
No, you are both wrong in opposite ways. The user agent defaults are
just style sheets and an important part in the cascade.
na...@thesmudge.com said:
I'm currently using one based on a template from http://www.joomlart.com
called ja_rochea. I moved around, eliminated, and added divs, and redid
most of the css, so it's not much like the original. But at least it
wasn't based on tables, if that's what you mean.
Well, I
Gabriele Romanato wrote:
Please read the latest two posts on IE7 on my blog and tell me if I
stumbled on something that's well-documented or not.
Can you please provide a URL that demonstrates the issue in the simplest
possible context?
Can you make up a static test?
It depends on what
Thanks everyone for your suggestions. It turns out I'm going to write my
own publishing engine instead for this assignment, so no Joomla this time.
/MB
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
At 9:56 PM +0100 3/7/10, MB wrote:
Thanks everyone for your suggestions. It turns out I'm going to write my
own publishing engine instead for this assignment, so no Joomla this time.
/MB
That's what I do.
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com
I recently acquired a copy of /Transcending CSS: The Fine Art of Web
Design/ by Andy Clarke (New Riders, 2007: ISBN 0-321-41097-1).
Mr Clarke is pushing CSS3 in this book, though he notes that (at the
time the book was written) support for CSS3 was spotty at best even for
the Mac (his preferred
I recently acquired a copy of /Transcending CSS: The Fine Art of Web
Design/ by Andy Clarke (New Riders, 2007: ISBN 0-321-41097-1).
Mr Clarke is pushing CSS3 in this book, though he notes that (at the
time the book was written) support for CSS3 was spotty at best even for
the Mac (his
On Mar 8, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Jeff Zeitlin wrote:
Mr Clarke is pushing CSS3 in this book, though he notes that (at the
time the book was written) support for CSS3 was spotty at best even for
the Mac (his preferred platform).
Note that CSS3 as a unit doesn't exist. 'CSS3' is a collection of
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 15:49:43 -0800, Thierry Koblentz
thierry.koble...@gmail.com wrote:
[Quoting me in ]
Question the first: Is this a widely-accepted philosophy in the
web-design community, and is it being widely adopted - and should it
be?
I think this is the right approach, but note that
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:11:25 +0900, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com
wrote:
On Mar 8, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Jeff Zeitlin wrote:
Mr Clarke is pushing CSS3 in this book, though he notes that (at the
time the book was written) support for CSS3 was spotty at best even for
the Mac (his preferred
Plus, I don't think the vast majority of website owners are going to
permit the charges for the kind of time this would take, so while it
would be worthwhile to try on one's own site, it's probably not best
to effect this across all your sites in progress.
Theresa
On Mar 7, 2010, at 4:40
On this file [1] there are 5 images at the very bottom of the left
column #one.
In addition to the fact that they blink, which is going to put me in a
locked-ward momentarily, there is an html and/or css error that escapes me.
There should be 3 images in left column set flush left, and 2
Theresa Mesa wrote:
Plus, I don't think the vast majority of website owners are going to
permit the charges for the kind of time this would take, so while it
would be worthwhile to try on one's own site, it's probably not best
to effect this across all your sites in progress.
Theresa
Freelance Traveller wrote:
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 15:49:43 -0800, Thierry Koblentz
thierry.koble...@gmail.com wrote:
[Quoting me in ]
Question the first: Is this a widely-accepted philosophy in the
web-design community, and is it being widely adopted - and should it
be?
I think this is
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:38 AM, David Laakso
da...@chelseacreekstudio.com wrote:
On this file [1] there are 5 images at the very bottom of the left
column #one.
In addition to the fact that they blink, which is going to put me in a
locked-ward momentarily, there is an html and/or css error
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Alan Gresley a...@css-class.com wrote:
It appears that MS has hacked in bidirection (somewhat improved over
IE7) by the use of *hasLayout*.
http://css-class.com/test/bugs/ie/ie8-haslayout-bidi.htm
Yes, I see the problem, very interesting!
I just would say
23 matches
Mail list logo
