On 11/11/10 9:41 PM, Steve Caramia wrote:
I built this nav system with the help of an article from the good
peeps at A List Apart (no javascript!). Since the whole thing is
CSS-driven, is there a way to make the submenus flush right to the nav
bar instead of flush left?
Keith Purtell wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but does this mean leading is not normally applied
to replaced elements, or that applying leading to the replaced element
(in this case an img) would be correct procedure and avoid the need for
the padding technique I used?
Eric Meyer addresses this
As I went to bed the solution came to me.
CSS:
#nav li.off ul#port, #nav li.on ul#port {
position: absolute;
left: -60px;
height: 30px;
}
#nav li.off ul#about, #nav li.on ul#about {
position: absolute;
left: 70px;
height: 30px;
}
xhtml:
Hi Steve,
http://www.caramiadesign.com/md/
The page looks good on a wide screen, but, as David mentioned, your
.container div (the one containing the nav) is pushing the page width out to
the right -- by about 380+px past your design, hence the horizontal scroll
bar.
When I look at it in a
Where did you get that picture of the cochlea?
Don't know. Got it from the client.
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Under 'Some Popular Woods' at bottom left, there's a nested unordered
list. I don't see why it's not showing up.
body.materials-finishes ul.photobar li ul {
margin: 0 0 1em 1em;
color: #373737;
list-style-type: disc;
}
body.materials-finishes ul.photobar li ul li {
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://datagnostics.com/test/vertical.html
I've got superscript text that needs to be all over the page -- it's
part of the company name.
At this point I'd raise the question whether the superscript text could be
written using superscript characters such as ². If it
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Steve Caramia
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 1:52 PM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Horizontal drop-down menu placement
Where did you get that
Thanks for pointing this out. I deleted the container class around the
navigation.
And David, I don't want to move it to the left. Trying to keep to my
client's design. (same with the font)
http://www.caramiadesign.com/md/
On 11/10/10 5:09 PM, Keith Purtell wrote:
I'm using this CSS ...
a[href^=http://]:after {
content: (online at: attr(href));
}
...to handle links to external sites when a visitor prints one of my
pages. However, I occasionally refer to related pages within my own
site/file directory.
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
In IE, the superscript mucks up the borders and margins -- it's as
though the element block goes up and never comes back down when I
close the superscript.
zoom is a CSS fix for the original test case, using sup is a different
story.
--
Regards,
Thierry
On 11/12/10 2:09 PM, Steve Caramia wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. I deleted the container class around the
navigation.
And David, I don't want to move it to the left. Trying to keep to my
client's design. (same with the font)
Cross your fingers and hope that none of client's users
Hi all,
I am working on a simple site that has columns and lines to divide the
columns. Perfect for faux columns as the columns aren't equal depth.
Anyway, when I put the background image in my page-wrap div, it
shows up fine. When I put it in the background of the content div
(because I
I am working on a simple site that has columns and lines to divide the
columns. Perfect for faux columns as the columns aren't equal depth.
Anyway, when I put the background image in my page-wrap div, it
shows up fine. When I put it in the background of the content div
(because I want the
Ar 12/11/10 21:24, ysgrifennodd Michael Beaudoin :
Hi all,
I am working on a simple site that has columns and lines to divide the
columns. Perfect for faux columns as the columns aren't equal depth.
Anyway, when I put the background image in my page-wrap div, it
shows up fine. When I put it
On 11/12/10 1:33 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I am working on a simple site that has columns and lines to divide
the columns. Perfect for faux columns as the columns aren't equal
depth.
Anyway, when I put the background image in my page-wrap div, it
shows up fine. When I put it in the background
In the CSS box model, are background images understood to occupy the
same height and width as the outer edge of the border area?
thank you
John
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
Ar 12/11/10 22:53, ysgrifennodd John :
In the CSS box model, are background images understood to occupy the
same height and width as the outer edge of the border area?
thank you
John
Border inner edge, isn't it? I.e. content + padding. Could be wrong,
though.
Cheers
Peter
--
In the CSS box model, are background images understood to occupy the
same height and width as the outer edge of the border area?
I believe it is the border box (content + padding + border)
--
Regards,
Thierry
www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-css.org | @thierrykoblentz
Ar 12/11/10 23:10, ysgrifennodd Thierry Koblentz :
In the CSS box model, are background images understood to occupy the
same height and width as the outer edge of the border area?
I believe it is the border box (content + padding + border)
--
Regards,
Thierry
www.tjkdesign.com |
Ar 12/11/10 23:21, ysgrifennodd Peter Bradley :
I'm going to have to play now to see if a border overlays a background
image or /vice versa/. Just as I was thinking about calling it a day
for today!
Yup. If you have a background colour and a dotted or dashed border, you
can see the
Hi David,
I think that Michael is talking about the background-image on
div#content. It does not show because the three columns it contains are
floats. Any containing floats method on div#content will make the
background-image show up:
Your post made me take a closer look at that page and it
On 11/12/10 8:02 PM, John wrote:
David;
A brief question if you have time..you helped me with this code the
other day. Why does #bar need top: 0; left:0?
left: 0 I get, but isn't top: 0 at the top of the very page itself?
why can't that black bar have the same code, except for the
On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
In the CSS box model, are background images understood to occupy the
same height and width as the outer edge of the border area?
I believe it is the border box (content + padding + border)
No, the default is the padding-box:
In the CSS box model, are background images understood to occupy
the
same height and width as the outer edge of the border area?
I believe it is the border box (content + padding + border)
No, the default is the padding-box:
Thanks Philippe,
In my mind we're talking background, not
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
In the CSS box model, are background images understood to occupy
the
same height and width as the outer edge of the border area?
I believe it is the border box (content + padding + border)
No, the default is the padding-box:
Thanks Philippe,
In my mind we're
David Laakso wrote:
On 11/12/10 8:02 PM, John wrote:
David;
A brief question if you have time..you helped me with this code the
other day. Why does #bar need top: 0; left:0?
left: 0 I get, but isn't top: 0 at the top of the very page itself?
why can't that black bar have the same code,
27 matches
Mail list logo
