Den 14.02.2014 17:46, skrev da...@higgsy.com:
http://problem1.higgsy.com/index4.html
My problem is I am trying to get the next image “Any Make, Any
Model” and the remaining text block below it, to flow up and sit between
the floated elements.
If you clean up the source-code (valid HTML
Greetings to all,
I know this is highly subjective question, but am curious as to what
people think about this issue. Allow me to put forth a few questions,
and you can pick all of any of them. When the WHATWG describes the I
element as a span of text in an alternate voice or mood, and the B
Interesting question. Much as I personally dislike them, web-app editors
like tinyMCE and FCK rely on tags like b and i and font
color=whatever
I don't see why those programs couldn't be re-written to use span
style=label:value;. But it would cause some developers to jump around
quickly.
On
I agree with Colin...I don't like them either.
But, they do remain in HTML5
http://html5doctor.com/i-b-em-strong-element/
Eric
On February 15, 2014 at 5:47 PM Ezequiel Garzón garzon.luc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Greetings to all,
I know this is highly subjective question, but am curious as to
Don't forget that while W3C may (or may not) decide that B and I are no
longer appropriate to keep in the standards, user-agents that maintain
compatibility with older standards will continue to work. The
elimination of a tag will be a slow process, if it can ever be
completed at all; all that
On 2/15/14, 4:40 PM, Eric wrote:
I agree with Colin...I don't like them either. But, they do remain in HTML5
http://html5doctor.com/i-b-em-strong-element/
Eric
On February 15, 2014 at 5:47 PM Ezequiel Garzón garzon.luc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Greetings to all,
I know this is highly subjective
Le 16 févr. 2014 à 07:47, Ezequiel Garzón garzon.luc...@gmail.com a écrit :
I know this is highly subjective question, but am curious as to what
people think about this issue. Allow me to put forth a few questions,
and you can pick all of any of them. When the WHATWG describes the I
element
The way I read the documentation (which could be incorrectly), there is no
reason for them to be deprecated as they (i, b, em, strong, etc.)
all serve their own semantic purpose. Side note: thank you for bringing up
this question, as I don't think I would have read the documentation on
these
I'll also add, this may be better suited for wha...@lists.whatwg.org
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Ezequiel Garzón garzon.luc...@gmail.comwrote:
Greetings to all,
I know this is highly subjective question, but am curious as to what
people think about this issue. Allow me to put forth a
