fine.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tom...@gmail.com'); wrote:
Float the sidebar and the main content div. clear them so the footer
remains under those two columns.
On Thursday, July 2, 2015, J.C. Berry jcharlesbe...@gmail.com
-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
it change.
Philip Taylor
+1
Best,
Karl
Agreed. Or have the image crop.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d
-- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
-- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css
__
Working ok for me in latest Chrome, FF and Safari (all Mac) . Do you have a
link to your version on a server somewhere?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic
/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
, I
wonder?
Tim
--
This *seems* to work for me in FF:
.quadrant .feedbox #facebook div div div div{
width:100%!important;
}
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought I'd made some progress on this, by setting the dimensions directly
in the iframe (as I seem to have done on holidaymull.co.uk). I can make it a
bit wider, but I still cannot get it to fill the space available
Sorry. I don't understand your question.
On Sunday, August 16, 2015, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
I know; but do what retina image do for retina display.
Tom Livingston wrote:
Yep. Media queries.
On Sunday, August 16, 2015, Crest Christopher crestchristop
?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
David, your procedure is one extra image I'll have to create :-( I'll
already have an array of images one more set may cause insanity
-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css
[css-d@lists.css-discuss.org javascript:;]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior
been at least 3 years old, often 5.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
(width:100%) its parent li or center (margin:0
auto;) in its parent li?
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
Can't post a link right now, but given the following:
nav{
ul{
width: 81.17021%;
max-width: 940px;
margin: 0 auto
Because 100% couldn't be calculated because the parent was a percentage?
'100% of what' kind of thing?
On Saturday, August 8, 2015, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
On Aug 8, 2015, at 01:13, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
OK, well after some more poking
Perfectly. Thanks. Makes sense. And I'll take close as a personal
accomplishment no matter how far it really was. :-).
On Saturday, August 8, 2015, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
On Aug 8, 2015, at 22:36, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
Because 100
-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org javascript:;]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior
combination will be used in a new device that
comes
out tomorrow?
--
Cordially,
David
__
Agreed.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
On a related note, I thought it was still preferred to have the
cell-spacing attribute on a table. Is this not the case? Is that a
(legacy) browser support thing?
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Without looking too long, the one table that shows what you
this time, which has a (base?)
style of 0.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
max-width at desired widths and not
adjust them for landscape. So a phone landscape user eiuld still see the
portrait width.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
ww.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-di
http://viewportsizes.com/?filter=iPhone
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Crest Christopher
<crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is the iPhone 5c & 5s actual display width, at;
>
> 320px = good
> 319px = good
> 318px = good
> 317px = good
> 316px = *b
al devices, make adjustments
and run it again.
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
> Other than Opera Mini, you cannot run any other rendering engine on an
> iOS device other than the installed Webkit.
>
> My suggestion is to not build the page so it is dependent on pixel
ts is up to you. Deliver un-styled or
minimally styled content (just text?), make your layout work below
320, whatever you want.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
t;
Can't help you there. If you are referring to Mobilizer, then try the
free trial on Browserstack and see if you get the same results.
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
> http://viewportsizes.com/?filter=iPhone
>
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Med
Try a different list as this question isn't CSS-related.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Crest Christopher
<crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How do I make directories which are located on the server, as a project in
> Brackets ?
>
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End
e-mail client is incapable of displaying even the most basic parts of
> the Unicode repertoire correctly.
>
>
>
I only saw superscripted numbers as well, and I have my doubts that ios9.x
gmail client can't display unicode...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Log
On Sunday, October 11, 2015, Philip Taylor <p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> > I only saw superscripted numbers as well, and I have my doubts that
> > ios9.x gmail client can't display unicode...
>
> Saw only superscripted numbers in
On Sunday, October 11, 2015, Philip Taylor <p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> > For what it's worth, I usually use entities and have yet to hear of any
> > issues.
> >
> > This: not: '
> >
> > Though, I am no Unicode
On Sunday, October 11, 2015, Philip Taylor <p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
> > > I only saw superscripted numbers as well, and I have my doubts that
> > > ios9.x gmail client can't display unicode...
> >
> >
the very characters that Jeff was trying to
communicate.
Philip Taylor"
> From: Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> Date: Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 12:37 PM
> To: "p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk <javascript:;>" <p.tay...@rhul.ac.u
;> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
>> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
>> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.
If one pixel is causing such big issues, you may have bigger issues.
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015, Crest Christopher <crestchristop...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I should have designed at 319px width, not 320px width, arghh !
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
> Other than viewport
scuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom L
browserstack.com has mobile devices.
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015, Crest Christopher <crestchristop...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I mean; to preview the changes, to verify the changes are done correctly,
> not doing it blind folded !
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
cuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media
above and/or below?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
n styling,
your solution would be to use images that are large enough to hold up to
the widths needed between breakpoints.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogi
dth varies here based on your preferred
max width.
Optimize your images.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-
the purpose of the title
attribute. In fact, IIRC, the tool tip showing in IE is actually wrong
and shouldn't be happening anyway.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 |
"font.eot?#iefix") format("embedded-opentype"),
url("font.woff") format("woff"),
url("font.ttf") format("truetype"),
url("font.svg#fontcustom") format("svg");
font-weight: normal;
font-style: no
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Angela French <afre...@sbctc.edu> wrote:
>
>> That didn’t work. When I look at in IE developer tool (F12) it is
>> showing a strikethrough on
cuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Angela French <afre...@sbctc.edu> wrote:
> That didn’t work. When I look at in IE developer tool (F12) it is showing
> a strikethrough on that style. I don’t understand why though.
>
>
>
Would you have a link?
--
Tom Livingston | Senio
iscuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livings
off');
>> }
>> (I usually insert that near the top of my stylesheets, but it can go any
>> place)
>>
>> Philippe
>> --
>> Philippe Wittenbergh
>> http://l-c-n.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
="https://dpbfm6h358sh7.cloudfront.net/images/6117472/269629053.jpg;
> alt="Arduino
> Mega" style="max-width: 100%; "> Arduino Mega
> ₦8K
>
On the example page, in current Chrome Mac, I see the same alignment. The
₦7 000.00 and ₦5 000.00 text in both box
Yes
On Sunday, September 20, 2015, Crest Christopher <crestchristop...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> In terms of background images order ?
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> The order you have them in the CSS controls their stack order.
>
> On Sunday, September 20, 2015, Crest Ch
x2 image to
> what the x1 image is; or literally using the x2 graphic ?
>
> You will need to place the same dimensions of the 1x image on the 2x
> image. In other words, you need to scale it down in the mark up or CSS.
>
> ?
>
>
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
>
&g
of the original graphic or does
> it use the scaled, x2 graphic ?
>
> --
> .(-. Christopher .-).
>
>
> __
>
You will need to place the same dimensions of the 1x image on the 2x image.
In other words, you need to scale it
ki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.4
-
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
>>> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
>>> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
>>> List pol
?
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> Yes
>
> On Sunday, September 20, 2015, Crest Christopher <
> crestchristop...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','crestchristop...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> In terms of background images order ?
>>
>> Tom L
https://css-tricks.com/stacking-order-of-multiple-backgrounds/
On Sunday, September 20, 2015, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Z-index won't help unless you are putting each image in its own container.
> Z-index won't effect a background image itself.
>
> On Su
Did you read the info at the link I sent?
On Sunday, September 20, 2015, Crest Christopher <crestchristop...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I have multiple background images for a div, I want one of those
> background images to overlap the other.
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
ging the order of
> the background-images are no longer visible ?
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> Did you read the info at the link I sent?
>
>
If you are using the full background shorthand as shown at the CSS-tricks
link or our other email thread, you should have just reordered
at I have in place as
> a pseudo thus far;
>
> background-image: ,,
> background-position:,,
> I've tried the short hand, that being; 50% 50%, 0% 45%,0% 65%. Image_a &
> Image_b don't even appear, it's as if they are gone !
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
>
>
vs, each with its own image.
You can then use opacity on each div separately.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss
tinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End De
e
> anymore.)
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org <javascript:;>]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- htt
I'll jump back in here and say a big thank you to Mr. Meyer for all
that he has done thus far. Both with this list and in general.
Also, a big thank you to "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" for offering to pick up
the list. I have learned a lot here and hope it stays around...one way
or another.
__
I've used WD-L only a few times (not counting while css-d was down). I
don't think the responses are on par with css-d. I *get* answers, but,
like stackoverflow, "just use Bootstrap" isn't a good answer to me.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front
_
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org <javascript:;>]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org --
>From normalize.css:
sup,
sub{
font-size:75%;
line-height:0;
position:relative;
vertical-align:baseline;
}
sup{
top:-.5em;
}
sub{
bottom:-.25em;
}
Adjust as needed.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.
consider a fourth option of just keeping it up.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
y second main sheet was just all the same
imports as the first main sheet, minus the MQs. I would compile the two
main sheets simultaneously and deliver the MQ-less sheet to <= IE8. Since
we have *finally* kicked IE8 to the curb here, I may need to rethink my
method.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Fron
rge {
> color: blue;
> }
> }
>
The second article in my OP is about doing this. Pretty neat.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
ia (min-width: 767px) {
.selector {
color: blue;
}
}
My question is, is either of these methods more efficient/performant than
the other? My preferred method seems easier to keep organized (both in my
head and file-wise) but is it slower/less efficient?
TIA
--
Tom Livingsto
ew minutes
for some css-related questions?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
where I work, I am now wondering
if I should change my method and if there are any significant efficiencies
with working MQs in with the rest of my styles in a single scss file.
Thoughts?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
simplistic, but technically would work
provided you don't mind hover effects not working if you narrowed your
browser window enough. I'd rather not add script just for this issue.
Am I missing another simple solution?
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:07 PM, J.C. Berry <jcharlesbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks everyone, I should clarify: I have a main menu that is located at
>> the top of the viewport as a hamburger,
ecommend a good media queries tutorial/refresher that is
> both online and free?
>
> Reese.
>
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Media_Queries/Using_media_queries
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.45
e con't (and others can
chime in) off-list... unless this comes back around to CSS-only
dropdowns handling the above-mentioned issues. :)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Crest Christopher
<crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey everyone, is there a JS Mailing list that anyone is familiar with that
> is active ?
>
> Thanks
>
webdesign-l will handle JS questions I'm sure
http://www.webdesign-l.com/
--
To
On Monday, February 1, 2016, D'Arcy J.M. Cain <da...@vybenetworks.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:07:15 -0500
> Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > NAV UL LI:hover > UL {
> > > display: block;
> > > }
> >
List,
Anyone have a resource for handling site navigation with submenu
dropdowns, either CSS-only or otherwise, and accounts for touch?
Off-list replies, if necessary is, is appreciated to avoid
non-relevant noise for this list.
Thanks!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media
rs
> Design Drumm
> http://designdrumm.com
>
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2016, at 9:04 AM, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > I use both imageoptim and JPEGmini. Combined they do a good job.
> >
> > Tom Livingston | Senior F
ailman/listinfo/css-d
> >> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> >> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> >> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
> >
> > _
t; display:block;
> }
>
> Each Li is as;
>
> Li {
> display: inline-block;
> list-style-type:none;
>
>
>
A link is better as there may be other things effecting it. the
list-style-type should go on the ul. Display block on the ul is
unnecessary, unless you are over riding som
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.o
his to another list as it isn't css related.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://
Oh boy. Getting late. Sorry. ...
>
> .child{margin-left;0;}
> .child + .child{margin-left:x;}
>
> --
>
> Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
> ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
>
>
> #663399
>
>
--
Tom
Sorry. I guess to be more clear it should be:
.child{margin-left;}
.child + .child{margin-left:x;}
On Wednesday, January 20, 2016, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I use
> .child + .child{margin-left:x;}
>
>
> --
>
> Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Dev
The new Foundation is supposedly more lightweight than
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css
Oops...
The new Foundation is supposedly more lightweight than previous versions.
>
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
gt; Cheers,
> Micky
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org <javascript:;>]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http:/
ove to the left right away as the viewport
> gets narrower? Eventually it moves, but "portfolio" is cut off..I don't
> ssee what's at work here..thank you for any clues!
>
#header-meat is width 100% but is next to #header-red which is 3rem wide.
Tom Livingston | Senio
__
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supp
901 - 1000 of 1154 matches
Mail list logo
