Donna Casey wrote:
Alex Foley wrote:
I'd sure like a confirmation from someone that overflow: auto is the way
to go... I've been clearfix-ing up until about 12:03 pm today.
Zoe's excellent (free) article explains much of this:
http://communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?cid=6BC9D
Yehuda Katz wrote:
Essentially, I created a set of CSS Formatting guidelines designed to get
designers to create readable CSS that other designers could quickly get up
to speed on.
The spec is available in PDF form at
http://www.yehudakatz.com/CSSf-1-5-1-Spec.pdf.
The purpose of the CSSf
Sure it is. Adding clearing elements, and the ensuing additional CSS (or
extra clearing markup), makes code less readable for, in most cases, no good
reason. Since overflow: hidden or overflow: auto does the trick, the whole
issue of clearing floats becomes essentially a non-issue, and saves
Tom Livingston wrote:
Sure it is. Adding clearing elements, and the ensuing additional CSS (or
extra clearing markup), makes code less readable for, in most cases, no good
reason. Since overflow: hidden or overflow: auto does the trick, the whole
issue of clearing floats becomes essentially a
I'd sure like a confirmation from someone that overflow: auto is the way
to go... I've been clearfix-ing up until about 12:03 pm today.
Alex Foley
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
Hold on.
Adding overflow:auto; on a container will clear any and all floats
inside said
Alex Foley wrote:
I'd sure like a confirmation from someone that overflow: auto is the way
to go... I've been clearfix-ing up until about 12:03 pm today.
Here we go:
http://dev.l-c-n.com/IEW/containing-float-overflow.php
It's not as consistent as clear-fixing but in general using
On 7/17/06, Yehuda Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure it is. Adding clearing elements, and the ensuing additional CSS (or
extra clearing markup), makes code less readable for, in most cases, no good
reason. Since overflow: hidden or overflow: auto does the trick, the whole
issue of clearing
snip
i personally would rather not have scrollbars appear or things
disappear on elements with width or height. I prefer using option #2
in the wiki (http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=ClearingSpace),
which doesn't add additional markup, either
snip
I'm with CJ on this one, though I don't
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Yehuda Katz wrote:
Since overflow: hidden or overflow: auto does
the trick, the whole issue of clearing floats becomes essentially a
non-issue, and saves extra markup.
I use such design-methods quite
often, and the overflow-property doesn't cut it across
K. What is it I don't understand? :)
lr
You understand it correctly, actually.
--
Marc Luzietti
Flagship Project
Bayview Financial, L.P.
(305) 341-5624
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2006-07-16, Yehuda Katz wrote:
Essentially, I created a set of CSS Formatting guidelines designed to
get designers to create readable CSS that other designers could
quickly get up to speed on.
The spec is available in PDF form at
http://www.yehudakatz.com/CSSf-1-5-1-Spec.pdf.
So, the overflow-property is a useful solution for containing floats in
some cases, but not in others.
regards
Georg
Good to know,
Does a floated element within a container that has overflow : hidden ;
applied respect the padding of the container? In particular the bottom
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:17 AM, Robert O'Rourke wrote:
So, the overflow-property is a useful solution for containing
floats in
some cases, but not in others.
regards
Georg
Good to know,
Does a floated element within a container that has overflow : hidden ;
applied respect the
Hi guys,
Michael Geary of the jQuery list suggested I continue a discussion I started
there on this list related to CSS.
Essentially, I created a set of CSS Formatting guidelines designed to get
designers to create readable CSS that other designers could quickly get up
to speed on.
The spec is
Hey everyone,
Well, after 3 hours of unsuccessful tries I am coming back to you guys
in hopes that this problem can be solved.
My CSS code is losing all of it's formatting when viewed in a browser. I
am writing the code in Dreamweaver 8 and it is perfectly styled just
like I want it. However,
I went in to DW8 and under the Preferences you can set the
CODE FORMAT
properties.
Hi Cory
This is pretty far off-topic for this list and would probably be better
discussed in a Dreamweaver forum (see
http://www.macromedia.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/index.cfm?forumid=12).
Having said
Jim Nannery wrote:
Cory wrote:
I'm sorry, I think you guys are misunderstanding what I am saying. I am
not talking about how the layout looks in the browser, I am talking
about when you right click and view the source code, THAT is what is all
messed up. In particular the CSS. In DW8, the CSS is
david wrote:
No, the problem is that DW (and it's WYSI-not-really-what-you-get
competitors) is lying to you. The only way to really test and make sure
your pages are working right is checking it in a browser. Remember,
people don't browse websites using Dreamweaver! ;-)
I'm sorry, I
Hey everyone, I having a problem with my CSS formatting when viewed in a
browser compared to how I have it layed out in Dreamweaver 8. In DW8, it
is layed out perfectly and I can read everything just fine. When you
view the CSS code in the browser however, it is all over the place and
it loses
It's probably not the browser. Dreamweaver often times doesn't show
css layouts correctly.
If you have a link to your site that would probably help.
On Jan 20, 2006, at 1:33 PM, Cory Perry wrote:
Hey everyone, I having a problem with my CSS formatting when viewed
in a
browser compared
Cory Perry wrote:
Hey everyone, I having a problem with my CSS formatting when viewed in a
browser compared to how I have it layed out in Dreamweaver 8. In DW8, it
is layed out perfectly and I can read everything just fine. When you
view the CSS code in the browser however, it is all over
21 matches
Mail list logo
