-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
discuss.org] On Behalf Of Alan Gresley
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 7:50 AM
To: Mark Richards
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8 (was: IE8 is better but still slightly
broken)
-Original Message-
Why are you suggesting in the first place to pollute your
source with different conditional comments on every single
page of a site. That seems like to much work and maintenance
for me. Is that what you do?
Well, the pages of the sites I work on are generated
Mark Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why are you suggesting in the first place to pollute your
source with different conditional comments on every single
page of a site. That seems like to much work and maintenance
for me. Is that what you do?
Well, the pages of the sites I work on are
-Original Message-
From: Alan Gresley
Conditional Comments can be problematic to maintained and some
beginners
will start adding them to every page. Sometimes if it's not a
true CCS rendering issue at all but just incorrect
understanding of CSS or invalid CSS and markup.
I don't
Mark Richards wrote:
I'm curious as to why you're targeting various IEs with hacks when
conditional comments let you do the same thing? Especially if the hacks
are used to import external sheets in the first place, it seems to me
it's easier to just use CCs to load browser-specific fix-up
I'm curious as to why you're targeting various IEs with hacks when
conditional comments let you do the same thing? Especially if the hacks
are used to import external sheets in the first place, it seems to me
it's easier to just use CCs to load browser-specific fix-up sheets in
the first place.
