-Caveat Lector-
Jim Norman wrote:
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Scott Brown wrote:
>
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > nurev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > -Caveat Lector-
> > >
> > > Scott Brown wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -Caveat Lector-
> > > >
> > > > Robert Tatman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
-Caveat Lector-
nurev wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Jim Norman wrote:
> >
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > Ric Carter wrote:
> >
> > > -Caveat Lector-
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: nurev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Scott Brown wrote:
> > > > > Robert Tatman <[EMAIL PROTECTED
-Caveat Lector-
Jim Norman wrote:
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Ric Carter wrote:
>
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: nurev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Scott Brown wrote:
> > > > Robert Tatman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > At the risk of being massivel
-Caveat Lector-
[snip]
Tyranny was the sole reason the 2nd Amendment came about, idiot...
June
You go girl...!
Jim
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soapboxing! These are
-Caveat Lector-
Scott Brown wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> nurev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > Scott Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > -Caveat Lector-
> > >
> > > Robert Tatman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > -Caveat Lector-
> > > >
> > > > At the risk of being massively fl
-Caveat Lector-
YnrChyldzWyld wrote:
>
> I think there should be laws ENCOURAGING people to buy guns and
> carry them with them everywhere...if MORE people had guns, the crooks and
> creeps would then have reason to pause and wonder if their intended
> victims just might shoot back, instead of b
-Caveat Lector-
>Other arguments involve the use of personal firearms to ward off
>domestic tyranny. But if a tyrant controls the most powerful
>military force on Earth, will personal firearms matter? Really?
>Again, the 2nd Amendment makes no provision for fighting tyranny,
>so such arguments
-Caveat Lector-
On Tue, 4 May 1999, Ric Carter wrote:
>As stated, the "right to bear arms" is about STATE security, not
>individual self-protection.
Bull. Read the rest of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, AND the
Declaration of Independence...
In colonial America, individuals were the on
-Caveat Lector-
On Tue, 4 May 1999, nurev wrote:
>Disgusting or not you'll have to deal with it. Many of us are sick and
>tired of your mantra. We would like to get guns out of daily life and
>see what happens.
The Constitution is too precious to muck around with just to 'see what
happpens'
-Caveat Lector-
nurev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Scott Brown wrote:
> >
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > Robert Tatman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > -Caveat Lector-
> > >
> > > At the risk of being massively flamed, I am compelled by a sense of
> > > intellectual honesty t
-Caveat Lector-
nurev wrote:
>
> We would like to get guns out of daily life and see
> what happens.
> If the death rate drops ( which it will ) then that's the way it will
> stay.
I recently got the following e-mail suggesting that your assertion that
the death rate would drop is incorrect. H
-Caveat Lector-
Ric Carter wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> - Original Message -
> From: nurev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Scott Brown wrote:
> > > Robert Tatman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > At the risk of being massively flamed, I am compelled by a sense of
> > > > intellectual
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: nurev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Scott Brown wrote:
> > Robert Tatman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > At the risk of being massively flamed, I am compelled by a sense of
> > > intellectual honesty to propose that the time has come to repeal th
-Caveat Lector-
Scott Brown wrote:
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Robert Tatman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > At the risk of being massively flamed, I am compelled by a sense of
> > intellectual honesty to propose that the time has come to repeal the Second
> > Amendment to t
-Caveat Lector-
Robert Tatman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> At the risk of being massively flamed, I am compelled by a sense of
> intellectual honesty to propose that the time has come to repeal the Second
> Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
>
> What is at issue is not some
15 matches
Mail list logo
