-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 7/11/01 6:40:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Several years ago I went out checked on three camps in my area. They
didn't
> exist. >>
The old perloined letter trick. Yes, this would be good way of doing it.
However, it is just as easy to take an open field
-Caveat Lector-
On 11 Jul 01, at 18:39, tenebroust wrote:
> I believe you. My point in what I posted was to say that such camps may in fact
>exist BUT that anything people see is not going
> to be such camps in actuality. The camps if they exist would not be observable and
>would not be in a
-Caveat Lector-
I believe you. My point in what I posted was to say that such camps may in fact exist
BUT that anything people see is not going to be such camps in actuality. The camps if
they exist would not be observable and would not be in any area where they could be
scrutinized. Such a
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 7/10/01 8:47:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Though I don't doubt they exist somewhere in some capacity. >>
Several years ago I went out checked on three camps in my area. They didn't
exist.
http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
=
-Caveat Lector-
I really fail to see why these camps are still making their way around the conspiracy
culture. It seems to me that something of that magnitude would be kept strictly
covert and would not expect to see any evidence of them. When you see something it
probably is something else.
-Caveat Lector-
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=USCMike1%40aol.com
www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&[EMAIL PROTECTED]&btnG=Google+S
earch
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Dubious Reports of U.S. Concentration Camps
Newsgroups: misc.activism.militia
(
