-Caveat Lector-
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/27/99 12:53:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also the major drug companies have a large financial incentives to discover
expensive, patentable cures above natural inexpensive cures.
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 9/28/99 8:35:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bulletproof ignorance... complete safety from scarey facts.
Ignorance??? From a guy that can't correctly spell "scary" I'm not too put
off...
The burden of proof Goob, is on those making
alf Of Ric Carter
Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 9:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Homeopathy -the second curve
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will never understand homeopathy and many other New Science
technologies if you think in the conv
-Caveat Lector-
Just a quick word here Dave,
I used to work for a year in a healthfood store. I know where they make
a profit, hypochonriacs. You wouldn't believe how many different things
a person will buy in the quest to feel good. I know there may be not
much money in homeopathy etc but
, September 27, 1999 6:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Homeopathy -the second curve
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 9/27/99 9:46:34 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You have to PROVE them wrong. You cannot ASSUME them to be wrong.
Actually...the onus
-Caveat Lector-
You will never understand homeopathy and many other New Science technologies
if you think in the conventional framework.
You have to posit another dimension..we call it 4-space
Within conventional thinking homeopathy CANNOT WORK for several reasons
especially Avogadros
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will never understand homeopathy and many other New Science
technologies if you think in the conventional framework.
Ah, so we have to stop demanding that they be demonstrably effective?
You have to posit another
-Caveat Lector-
l, Of course they have to be demonstrable..You have inserted your
assumption into my statement..
Again study the MEMORY OF WATER by Michel Schiiff and the work of Jacques
Benveniste. at INSERM, in Paris. At last count there were 500 confirming
experiments
Schiff is the
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Homeopathy -the second curve
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will never understand homeopathy and many other New Science
technologies if you think in the conventional framework.
Ah, so we have to stop demanding
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 9/27/99 9:46:34 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You have to PROVE them wrong. You cannot ASSUME them to be wrong.
Actually...the onus is on those making wild and silly
claims"Extraordinary claims
require extraordinary
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 9/27/99 12:53:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also the major drug companies have a large financial incentives to discover
expensive, patentable cures above natural inexpensive cures.
Having said all that i'd trust normal alipathic
11 matches
Mail list logo
