-Caveat Lector-
Yeah but you should know even from reading "acceptable" media sources, that we
all have to muck around EVERYWHERE to find the truth. So in principle I don't
see too much difference in reading the writings of a communist crackpot, or
reading the latest National Review. Caveat
-Caveat Lector-
Kris is right... Larouche is no saint but he does have a lot of very good
information from time to time. I'll bet even Clinton will tell the truth
occasionally if it meets his immediate needs. Larouche's EIR magazine
(Executive Intelligence Review) did an outstanding analysis
insanity there
is a kernel of truth. I suppose it depends on how much junk and nonsense
you want to muck around in to find that truth. Just my 2 cents worth.
Hilary
--
From: Lyn McCloskey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Treason in America
Date: Friday, April
-Caveat Lector-
Lyn McCloskey wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
Kris is right... Larouche is no saint but he does have a lot of very good
information from time to time. I'll bet even Clinton will tell the truth
occasionally if it meets his immediate needs. Larouche's EIR magazine
(Executive
-Caveat Lector-
I would like to add something here; years ago at Silver Springs MD I met
this couple friends of my sister. They lived on a huge estate, and he
was the Captain over Andrews AFBsome years later, my sisters and I
wanted to go to Russiamy brother-in-law said no, but he then
