[CTRL] We Bombed Chinese Embassy on Purpose

2001-04-11 Thread Bill Richer

-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

We Bombed Chinese Embassy on Purpose 
John LeBoutillier
Tuesday, April 10, 2001 
One of my best friends, who lives in D.C., told me something yesterday 
extremely relevant to the ongoing China Spy Plane Standoff. Not long ago he 
ran into a CIA man who privately told him:
Two years ago, during the Kosovo 'police action', we purposively bombed the 
Chinese Embassy in Belgrade!

It seems that the CIA had good intelligence that the Chinese Embassy was 
helping Milosovic's Serbian forces so we decided to 'take out the embassy.'

Of course publicly we have said all along that it was a 'mistake' – that we 
were operating from an "old, outdated CIA map."

And, after many Beijing demonstrations against our embassy there, President 
Clinton did offer the all-important-to-the-Chinese 'apology'. Ironic, eh? We 
justifiably bomb their embassy because they are helping our enemy in trying 
to kill Americans and we apologize for it. (Clinton loved to say he was 
"sorry." I guess he had much in his life to apologize for.)

But in this case they demand an apology for something they did.

Looking back on the Kosovo operation, it is another example of why the United 
States of America should not engage in any combat operation without a formal 
declaration of war. Such a declaration – and the congressional debates 
leading up to it – prepare the public for the human cost of the war.

If that had happened before we sent planes, copters and troops into combat, 
then we would not have had to lie to the American people!

If we had good intelligence that Beijing was helping the butcher Milosovic, 
then that intel should have been shared with the American people.

We, the people who send the bodies and the money, have a right to know – in a 
legitimate and legally declared war – who is trying to kill our troops.

If, in the face of that, Red China wants to side with our enemy, then we had 
every right to hit their embassy.

Diplomatic immunity be damned!

It is a violation of such immunity to use it as cover to aid a party in a 
legally declared war.

So we were entirely justified in taking out their embassy.

The only mistake we made was not telling the American people and the world 
the truth about just how evil and complicitous Beijing really is.

Now we have yet another opportunity to stand up to the Butchers of Beijing 
and cut them down to size – before they become so militarily strong that we 
cannot.




*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, 
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use 
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational 
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
ÝÝÝÚrchives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A
o subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send 
email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] We Bombed Chinese Embassy on Purpose

2001-04-11 Thread Michael Pugliese

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.sfbg.com/News/35/28/28pc.html
4. Did the U.S. deliberately bomb the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade?

On May 7, 1999, U.S. planes bombed the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade.
President Clinton called the bombing "a tragic mistake," the result of
faulty maps provided by U.S. intelligence services.

That was good enough for the American media, but it wasn't good enough for
their overseas counterparts. Working together, reporters from the London
Observer and Copenhagen's Politiken found U.S. and NATO government and
military sources who told a different story. One official at the National
Imagery and Mapping Agency, perhaps piqued at the assertion that his agency
had botched its job, called the faulty-map story "a damned lie."

In fact, according to these high-ranking sources, NATO deliberately targeted
the Chinese Embassy, which was serving as a rebroadcast station for the
Yugoslav army.

After the Observer broke the story, the Associated Press wire service picked
it up, but few major papers ran it. The Washington Post gave it 90 words in
an international news briefs section, under the headline, "NATO Denies Story
on Embassy Bombing." The New York Times didn't mention it at all. When the
press watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting asked the Times why
it ignored the story, the paper's foreign editor described the Observer's
piece as "not terribly well-sourced, by our standards at least."

"It sounds like the Times might be holding out for a named official source,"
FAIR's Seth Ackerman told In These Times, "which is a standard of evidence
that the Times likes to apply in cases where they would rather not report
the story at all."

Seth Ackerman, In These Times, 6/26/00; Joel Bleifuss, In These Times,
12/12/99; Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting staff report, 2/9/00; Yoichi
Shimatsu, Pacific News Service, 10/20/99.

Foreign coverage: the Observer (U.K.), Politiken (Denmark), Glasgow Herald
(Scotland), the Scotsman (Scotland), South China Morning Post, the Times
(U.K.).

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om