Re: [CTRL] Constitutional gun control

1999-06-04 Thread Stopforth, Jamie

 -Caveat Lector-

  Wow, that's a philosophy to live by.  If it ain't us it's darn right okay
then ain't it... "Yuh wanna draw Pilgrim?"

Jamie


 And, thanks to Clinton's blood banks - how many Canadians have become
 infected with AIDS? 


 Colleen...one must ask...who really cares
 They ain't US!!!
  Bill.

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Constitutional gun control

1999-06-03 Thread E Mael

 -Caveat Lector-

[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lloyd Miller) writes about "constitutional
rights involving gun control". As you know, the Bilderbergers are
reputedly
in session in Portugal. They, the CFR, the Tri lateralists and the
International bankers ( including our "Federal Reserve"  banking system)
have
zero interest in perpetuating individual countries constitutional rights.
Their "NEW WORLD ORDER" intends government and manipulation of all
peoples of
the world for their profit and purposes regardless of any national
constitutional statutes.

Consider the United States constitutional rights that have been removed,
ignored or diluted using the excuse of "drug law enforcement".


i have recently determined that the great war is between the internet and
the great beast; prolly the 666 one. these two forces are out to do each,
the other, in. the bildyourburgers have been having more meetings lately.
no doubt they are strategic planning meetings. as the battle heats up,
their options and contingencies have to be explored and implimented. as
the heat goes up they have to stay close to the front. but by that, their
invisible hands are becoming more visible. they are losing the night, that
is the field in which their treasonous acts are most effective. we are
coming upon very interesting times indeed.
stay tuned boys and girls.

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Constitutional gun control

1999-06-03 Thread Colleen Jones

 -Caveat Lector-

All I want is them to leave our cows alone. Anthrax - Mad Cow Disease -
I can do without the Bilderberger Hambergers too.

But England, in the west they had to shoot their cattle when anthrax
hit; in England, mad cows.the cows must be destroyed.

But, today there are companies using cattle parts, from the pineal glad,
etc., for other purposes in experiments.

Cattle mutilitations in the USA?   Which is worse, the cattle dying from
anthrax and mad cow disease, or from vicious experiments blamed on
Ufo's.

Why suddenly now, do they want our troops to be immunized from Anthrax;
and why do our troops refuse.like some of these othr vaccines, who
has polluted what.

And, thanks to Clinton's blood banks - how many Canadians have become
infected with AIDS?  In Canada, there is a civil war brewing, that will
only equate to 76

Lates - anyone living or visiting England is not to give blood
transfusionsbecause of maybe eating the mad cows..

If this stuffis all true - there are a few public officials who should
be tried for more than just bad judgment and stupidity; manslaughter, or
murder, if this was done knowingly.

But then, look at our blood banks once headed by Elizabeth Doledid
they evr buy any from Arkansas?

Colleen

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Constitutional gun control

1999-06-03 Thread William Shannon

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 6/3/99 12:27:10 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 And, thanks to Clinton's blood banks - how many Canadians have become
 infected with AIDS? 


 Colleen...one must ask...who really cares
 They ain't US!!!
  Bill.

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Constitutional gun control

1999-06-02 Thread Lloyd Miller

 -Caveat Lector-

No!  The Amendment says, in effect:   _Because_ a well regulated militia is
necessary, _then_ the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed!
The arms involved should be those normally used by soldiers in WAR!  Assault
rifles, if not 50 Caliber Machine guns, should be legal!

THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGEDit doesn't matter
whythat is what the Bill of Rights says!  No licensing, no registration,
no prohibition of carrying concealed weapons!The Founding Fathers were
all gun nuts!  The first thing the British tried to do in Boston was seize
supplies of powder and ball!  The Founding Fathers knew that liberty must be
defended on occasion by just violence!

Citizens who misuse guns should be punished severely.  Using a gun in a
crime of any kind is threatened murder and should result in the death
penalty or life in prison.


-Original Message-
From: Dr. Ken Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 2:48 PM
Subject: RE: Constitutional gun control


One friend wrote:

Ken,

But the 2nd Amendment gives a specific "well-regulated" purpose for bearing
arms, right?  It does not use the word individual.  Also, the Supreme
Court, or so I have been told, has never interpreted the 2nd amendment to
apply on the level of the individual.


Well, sir, we can accept the definitions of our enemies, or we can use the
definitions of our Founders.  "Well-regulated" means "well trained and
well-equipped," not "well-limited."  "People" means "individuals."  It does
not refer to some group of people.  The Federalist Papers make it clear
that the Second Amendment applies to the right of each individual to be
equipped with arms so that each state might have a "well-regulated"
militia.  If gun ownership were a state right, they would have said "the
right of the states to keep and bear arms."  In the Tenth Amendment, both
"states" and "people" are used, indicating they are separate, and "people"
cannot mean "states."  The Fourth Amendment says, "The right of the people
to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated."  Do you think
that the "people" in the Fourth Amendment are different from the "people"
in the Second?

One of the purposes of the Constitution is to protect you and me, "the
people" from usurpations of power by the government.  The Supreme Court
Justices are appointed by the President and ratified by the Senate.  Are
they on the side of the government or the people?  What makes you think
they would not be motivated to interpret the Constitution in favor of
government and against the rights of the people?  Where does the
Constitution say it is whatever the Supreme Court says it is?  If the
people are willing to surrender their Holy Constitution to the whims of the
Supreme Court, they no longer deserve its protections and they will lose
them.

I once wrote a petition on which we got over 20,000 signatures, asking my
Congressman to use his constitutional powers ("with such exceptions, and
under such regulations as the Congress shall make." -- Article III, Section
2) to restrict the Supreme Court's power to review state abortion laws.  He
said he could not restrain the Supreme Court because they had the power to
interpret the constitutionality of anything Congress did.  That important
check and balance held by Congress over the Supreme Court has been lost due
to our traditional enthronment of the Supreme Court.  Actually, the
Constitution gave no such sweeping powers to the Supreme Court.  They stole
that power in Marbury vs Madison in 1803.  I am just trying to challenge
that 200-year-old myth.  I may stand alone, but I am right.

Ken

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Constitutional gun control

1999-06-02 Thread Jim Norman

 -Caveat Lector-

Lloyd Miller wrote:

  -Caveat Lector-

 No!  The Amendment says, in effect:   _Because_ a well regulated militia is
 necessary, _then_ the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed!
 The arms involved should be those normally used by soldiers in WAR!  Assault
 rifles, if not 50 Caliber Machine guns, should be legal!

 THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGEDit doesn't matter
 whythat is what the Bill of Rights says!  No licensing, no registration,
 no prohibition of carrying concealed weapons!The Founding Fathers were
 all gun nuts!  The first thing the British tried to do in Boston was seize
 supplies of powder and ball!  The Founding Fathers knew that liberty must be
 defended on occasion by just violence!

 Citizens who misuse guns should be punished severely.  Using a gun in a
 crime of any kind is threatened murder and should result in the death
 penalty or life in prison.

 -Original Message-
 From: Dr. Ken Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 2:48 PM
 Subject: RE: Constitutional gun control

 One friend wrote:

 Ken,
 
 But the 2nd Amendment gives a specific "well-regulated" purpose for bearing
 arms, right?  It does not use the word individual.  Also, the Supreme
 Court, or so I have been told, has never interpreted the 2nd amendment to
 apply on the level of the individual.

And rightly so, since the amendment does not speak to the individual, but to
congress.  9 of the first 10 amendments were written to prevent congress from
passing laws infringing those rights.  When the Supreme court ruled some years ago
that the second amendment conferred no new rights for the citizens, it was
correct!  The rights preceded those amendments.
Jim

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om