Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
-Caveat Lector- SCIO-LTD wrote: > > -Caveat Lector- > > - Original Message - > From: nurev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, June 11, 1999 3:20 AM > Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal. > > > -Cavea

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-15 Thread Anonymous
-Caveat Lector- - Original Message - From: Eagle 1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > By the way, what use are you planning to make of the information you > collect from these surveys, 'books' ? (Just curious). It can't be as nefarious as compiling a "hit list" of those who answer incorrectly, s

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-15 Thread Anonymous
s to why I believe one way or another. By the way, what use are you planning to make of the information you collect from these surveys, 'books' ? (Just curious). eagle 1 - Original Message - From: books <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-15 Thread Anonymous
Volume Discounts in any form, or their equivalent, are hereby declared unconstitutional. -Original Message- From: SCIO-LTD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, June 15, 1999 5:01 PM Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal. &

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-15 Thread Anonymous
-Caveat Lector- - Original Message - From: nurev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 11, 1999 3:20 AM Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal. > -Caveat Lector- > > SCIO-LTD wrote: > > > > -Caveat Lector- > >

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-14 Thread Anonymous
-Caveat Lector- Nuerve and Joshua2 - what am I going to do with you boysthat was not what Jesus said, humping daschounds he said it would be easier for a Rockefeller to go through the eye of the needle, than a rich man to get into heavensomething like that. Can't I leave you two al

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-14 Thread Anonymous
-Caveat Lector- SCIO-LTD wrote: > > -Caveat Lector- > > Let me address some of your false conclusions as follows nurev: (and let's > dispense with the puerile value judgements, "You get a little self serving > here don't you buddy?" ) I don't think I care to dispense with my value judgments,

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-10 Thread M.A. Johnson
-Caveat Lector- William Hugh Tunstall wrote: Much of the R and D in high tech industries is funded by the taxpayers... We have NASA, NSA, Livermore, MIT, the mammoth defense contractors.. Silicon Valley has had its share of government subsidies.. MJ: Then it is

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-10 Thread M.A. Johnson
-Caveat Lector- SCIO-LTD wrote: The subsidies are often indirect through the granting of minor or major monopolies, (for a good example see the history of AT&T, and the monopoly they had for well over a half a century).The government often has a dual use/dual purpose

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-10 Thread nurev
-Caveat Lector- SCIO-LTD wrote: > > -Caveat Lector- > > This piece alone deserves posting: > > nurev wrote to SCIO-LTD: > [The internet has promise in several areas, none of > which are necessary for sustaining life.] > > Think again. I read the piece. I see no reason to change my statement. B

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-10 Thread SCIO-LTD
-Caveat Lector- This piece alone deserves posting: nurev wrote to SCIO-LTD: [The internet has promise in several areas, none of which are necessary for sustaining life.] Think again. Digital Society Internet Whacks $2 Billion Off Merrill Lynch by Clay Shirky THE INTERNET HAPPENED to Merri

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-10 Thread SCIO-LTD
C Hearon Founder & CEO SCIO-LTD http://www.scio-ltd.net http://www.scio-ltd.com http://www.scio-ltd.org - Original Message - From: nurev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 12:13 AM Subject: Re: [CTRL

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-10 Thread SCIO-LTD
www.scio-ltd.org - Original Message - From: M.A. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 7:53 PM Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal. > -Caveat Lector- > > SCIO-LTD wrote: > The subsidies ar

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-10 Thread nurev
-Caveat Lector- "M.A. Johnson" wrote: > > -Caveat Lector- > > William Hugh Tunstall wrote: > Much of the R and D in high tech industries is funded > by the taxpayers... We have NASA, NSA, Livermore, MIT, > the mammoth defense contractors.. Silicon Valley > has had its shar

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-10 Thread nurev
-Caveat Lector- "M.A. Johnson" wrote: > > -Caveat Lector- > > SCIO-LTD wrote: > The subsidies are often indirect through the granting of > minor or major monopolies, (for a good example see the > history of AT&T, and the monopoly they had for well over > a half a century).Th

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-09 Thread nurev
-Caveat Lector- SCIO-LTD wrote: > > -Caveat Lector- > > As a technology professional with over tens years Internet experience, I can > testify to William Hugh Tunstall comments. The subsidies are often > indirect through the granting of minor or major monopolies, (for a good > example see th

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-09 Thread M.A. Johnson
-Caveat Lector- SCIO-LTD wrote: The subsidies are often indirect through the granting of minor or major monopolies, (for a good example see the history of AT&T, and the monopoly they had for well over a half a century).The government often has a dual use/dual purpose agen

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-09 Thread Anonymous
-Caveat Lector- William Hugh Tunstall wrote: Much of the R and D in high tech industries is funded by the taxpayers... We have NASA, NSA, Livermore, MIT, the mammoth defense contractors.. Silicon Valley has had its share of government subsidies.. MJ: Then it is NOT capital

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-09 Thread SCIO-LTD
ltd.com http://www.scio-ltd.org - Original Message - From: William Hugh Tunstall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 3:14 PM Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal. > -Caveat Lector- > > Much of t

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-09 Thread William Hugh Tunstall
-Caveat Lector- Much of the R and D in high tech industries is funded by the taxpayers... We have NASA, NSA, Livermore, MIT, the mammoth defense contractors.. Silicon Valley has had its share of government subsidies.. So the argument that market forces (capitalism) are responsible for hig

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-07 Thread M.A. Johnson
-Caveat Lector- Nurev: No matter what changes and inovations Capitalism goes through, there always remains the deadly constants. 1- Private ownership of large amounts of capital ALWAYS causes concentration of wealth into few hands. With that ALWAYS comes control and expl

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-06 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 6/6/99 8:58:28 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << 6/6/99 No matter what changes and inovations Capitalism goes through, there always remains the deadly constants. 1- Private ownership of large amounts of capital ALWAYS causes concent

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-06 Thread nurev
-Caveat Lector- 6/6/99 No matter what changes and inovations Capitalism goes through, there always remains the deadly constants. 1- Private ownership of large amounts of capital ALWAYS causes concentration of wealth into few hands. With that ALWAYS comes control and exploitation of society. 2