Re: [ctwm] ctwm-3.8b? ctwm-3.9?

"Matthew D. Fuller" asked: [AS] > > Unfortunately monontone has a terrible bug: unlike wget, it loses > > all information about when the files were created, so I don't know > > how old this system is. > [MDF] > I'm not really sure what you mean by this. Apologies. It was not really relevant to c

Re: [ctwm] ctwm-3.8b? ctwm-3.9?

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 02:15:04PM +0100 I heard the voice of Aaron Sloman, and lo! it spake thus: > > Unfortunately monontone has a terrible bug: unlike wget, it loses > all information about when the files were created, so I don't know > how old this system is. I'm not really sure what you mean

Re: [ctwm] ctwm-3.8b? ctwm-3.9?

> However, no amount of searching with google led to any other > information about "ctwm (3.9devel)" and where to get it. > > I concluded it must be something specific to Debian, which I don't > use, so gave up. The newest package in Debian is 3.7, so I ended up building ctwm from the newest sour

Re: [ctwm] ctwm-3.8b? ctwm-3.9?

Thanks for this: > > Where is that? Google gives no information about a repository with > > anything later than 3.8a. Neither does the cwtm page, as far as I > > can tell. > > It's not very loud about announcing itself, but it's there. > > OK. I

Re: [ctwm] ctwm-3.8b? ctwm-3.9?

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:22:58AM +0100 I heard the voice of Aaron Sloman, and lo! it spake thus: > > That implies that something like the code required for full screen > flash is in recent versions of fvwm. I don't know if it would be > straightforward for a C programmer (which I am not!) to por

Re: [ctwm] ctwm-3.8b? ctwm-3.9?

"Matthew D. Fuller" wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:11:03PM +0100 I heard the voice of > Dave, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > Anyone got any pointers on what is causing flash to get annoyed with > > ctwm in this way? > > I s'pose the most likely thing is that it's trying to ask the WM some >