On Sun, 2 Oct 20111 21:56 Daniel Stenberg dan...@haxx.se wrote:
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Marcin Adamski wrote:
I don't have any quick and easy way to drop my interface since I run the
test on a single machine. What if I shut down the TFTP server in the midst
of the transfer, would that
My fault.
I think this should do it:
diff --git a/lib/share.c b/lib/share.c
index a3eae16..78da890 100644
--- a/lib/share.c
+++ b/lib/share.c
@@ -186,11 +186,13 @@ curl_share_cleanup(CURLSH *sh)
if(share-cookies)
Curl_cookie_cleanup(share-cookies);
if(share-sslsession) {
+#ifdef
I'm wondering what are consequences of late curl_multi_perform call. I guess
that it may cause some timeouts to occur later than it should i.e. we set
CURLOPT_TIMEOUT for 60s, but whole operation lasted 62s. But are there any
significant consequences for ongoing transfer? Say we are downloading
Thanks for your answers I will check those.
Why is curl_multi_perform() a bigger problem than calling
curl_easy_perform() ?
Because (unless I'm doing something wrong or misunderstood)
curl_easy_perform is synchronous and will call the write callback each time
the server sends notification,
Marcin Adamski wrote:
I'm wondering what are consequences of late curl_multi_perform call. I guess
that it may cause some timeouts to occur later than it should i.e. we set
CURLOPT_TIMEOUT for 60s, but whole operation lasted 62s. But are there any
significant consequences for ongoing
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Marcin Adamski wrote:
I'm wondering what are consequences of late curl_multi_perform call. I guess
that it may cause some timeouts to occur later than it should i.e. we set
CURLOPT_TIMEOUT for 60s, but whole operation lasted 62s. But are there any
significant consequences
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Rich Gray wrote:
Before version 7.20.0: If you receive CURLM_CALL_MULTI_PERFORM, this
basically means that you should call curl_multi_perform again, before you
select() on more actions.
I'm trying to figure out what this really means.
If you use a recent libcurl I
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Rich Gray wrote:
Before version 7.20.0: If you receive CURLM_CALL_MULTI_PERFORM, this
basically means that you should call curl_multi_perform again, before
you select() on more actions.
I'm trying to figure out what this really means.
If you use a
See attached patch, fixing an issue when running a configure with
-Werror -Wall and the current libcurl.m4.
the fix simply introduces 'to use' x;
Dominique
From 0a8361df11617fe0a59687b00f020a8e9f15e83f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dominique Leuenberger dims...@opensuse.org
Date: Mon, 3 Oct
Thanks! Thinking further, is there enough information available to
recognize
the connection as not being dirty in this case and actually leave it
open?
It appears that closing the connection in case when no data was sent out is
somewhat pessimistic and wastes a perfectly good
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón wrote:
My fault.
I think this should do it:
Thanks!
But I took a larger scope and removed the sslsession completely from the
struct when SSL isn't used and while doing that, I did the same for the
cookies and I added a new return code for the
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
See attached patch, fixing an issue when running a configure with -Werror
-Wall and the current libcurl.m4.
the fix simply introduces 'to use' x;
Thanks a lot, pushed!
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Steve Holme wrote:
I see there is also the potential for another leak when from is
successfully allocated but size fails. I have attached a small patch to
fix this issue as well.
Thanks, pushed!
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011, Steve Holme wrote:
Please find attached three patches which ultimately add NTLM authorisation
support to SMTP. This carries on the work I was involved with during July
and August but unfortunately ran out of time on to complete for the v7.22.0
release.
Thanks a lot! I've
Hi Daniel,
Please find attached three patches which ultimately add NTLM
authorisation support to SMTP. This carries on the work I was involved
with during July and August but unfortunately ran out of time on to
complete for the v7.22.0 release.
Thanks a lot! I've pushed your
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
But I took a larger scope and removed the sslsession completely from
the struct when SSL isn't used and while doing that, I did the same
for the cookies and I added a new return code for the share interface
when trying to share
16 matches
Mail list logo