On Mon, 8 Aug 2016, Rod Widdowson wrote:
> What's the story with the projects\vcXXX tree. I think that it is less
> capable> than the command line, but we are trying to move our projects that
> way
It was always going to be work in progress, however, my initial aim was to add
support for
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> I was prompted by a recent PR [1] to once again revisit this idea: I want to
> remove the nmake build files for Windows (all the files named
> Makefile.vc[number]). I want to have windows users wanting to build curl on
> the command line to use the
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> > I also appreciate this is a little subjective but I would have thought
> > adding support for NTLM with mbedTLS is also a new functionality -
> > previously NTLM wasn't supported with mbedTLS so I wouldn't class that as a
> > bug fix.
>
> That's
On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 01:00 +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Thanks a lot for your contribution. Sorry for the slight delay in responding
> to this patch.
And apologies for the further delay in responding; I didn't see it for
a week
Daniel Stenberg in gmane.comp.web.curl.library (Mon, 8 Aug 2016 16:18:53
+0200 (CEST)):
>I was prompted by a recent PR [1] to once again revisit this idea: I want to
>remove the nmake build files for Windows (all the files named
>Makefile.vc[number]). I want to have windows users wanting to
+1 from me (as the source of the problem).
What's the story with the projects\vcXXX tree. I think that it is less capable
than the command line, but we are trying to move our projects that way with,
"msbuild foo.sln /p:Debug|Release /platform=x64" being left available to
command line users...
Hey,
I was prompted by a recent PR [1] to once again revisit this idea: I want to
remove the nmake build files for Windows (all the files named
Makefile.vc[number]). I want to have windows users wanting to build curl on
the command line to use the setup in the winbuild/ directory.
This in
