On Mon, 6 Aug 2018, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
- implement the missing pieces of the API:
I've pushed a first PR of the URL API work to make sure all tests and builds
are happy:
https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/2842
I've listed outstanding work in there.
The API works pretty good already
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018, Radu Hociung wrote:
We got a fresh new HTTP pipelining bug submitted today [1]
I am the submitter of that bug, and now that I understand it better have
revised the issue report. It is NOT a pipelining bug, but a plumbing bug.
Right, quite ironic I think that it wasn't a
On 30/06/2018 5:16 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> We got a fresh new HTTP pipelining bug submitted today [1]. We already
> have other pipelining bugs listed in the KNOWN_BUGS document [2].
I am the submitter of that bug, and now that I understand it better, I
have revised the issue report. It is
Hi All,
I have 2 questions:
1. I intend to write an application to get content over HTTP2 over
multiple-streams (multiplexed) over one connection. With the command
line tool [1] i could get content over single stream.
I found this snippet [2] that helped me write this [3]. But I need to
Hello,
I am trying to create a PHP script to upload a single file to the WebDAV
interface on a Nextcloud instance. The code I have so far is:
$curl = curl_init();
curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_URL, $NextcloudHost .
'/remote.php/webdav/files/' . $NextcloudUser . '/' . $calName);
Daniel wrote...
Ok, so I installed Win 10 on Virtualbox 5.2.16 on my machine and I can
confirm Jan's findings; in NAT mode the ideal backlog stays flat at 64
KB, and the patch provides no benefits.
Once I switched to "Bridged adapter", I got normal results (as in,
similar to what other people
2018-08-05 10:01 GMT+02:00 Andy Pont :
> VirtualBox 5.0.16 was released in March 2016 and so it two years out of date
> and is unsupported by Oracle. The current version is 5.2.16. If possible
> you should try upgrading and seeing if you get the same results.
Ok, so I installed Win 10 on
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
Good or bad? What would your application need and would this work for that?
I've written some initial code for this API [1] now. As I proceed further, I
intend to remove the wiki page as I suspect there will be a lot of details
that have changed
