myLC--- via curl-library wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018, Richard Gray wrote:
> I'm confused about what it is you are trying to do with
> the list of addresses?
...
If you have a list of IPs/hostnames, this is necessary to
identify duplicate entries (public VPNs or proxies, for
instance).
OK,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:17:08AM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> Aha... well even if this is so, the effects of this will at least be
> mitigated by the fact that libcurl will still canonicalize them even if it
> wouldn't be perfect.
>
> I mean a user who wants to compare two URLs should make
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library wrote:
Thanks for the stats. It indicates that my choice for 320 KB in the iOS app
(using sftp) is quite good.
I would like us to...
1. Change to alloc-on-demand for this buffer. It is used for a few non-upload
things, but it only needs to
myLC--- wrote:
Prioritization (which IPs libcurl should favor) might become
an issue then.
"should favour" how? Based on what; that IPv6 is better/speedier
than IPv4, or some addresses based on Geo-location is best?
libcurl knows zero about this. It would be cool if it did though.
In fact
Daniel Stenberg via curl-library (Tue, 14 Aug 2018 12:02:46 +0200
(CEST)):
> Size Seconds Improvement
>
> 16 KB2.522-
> 64 KB1.281x 1.97
> 128 KB 1.095x 2.30
> 256 KB 0.938x 2.69
> 512 KB 0.860x 2.93
Thanks for the stats. It indicates that my choice
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library wrote:
I did not test if there is a difference on *nix. Did you?
Here are the results my tests run just now.
Using Linux kernel 4.17. Upload 4GB over plain HTTP to Apache 2.4.34 on
localhost - so really 0 RTT.
I ran "time curl -sT 4GB
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018, Richard Gray wrote:
> I'm confused about what it is you are trying to do with
> the list of addresses?
...
If you have a list of IPs/hostnames, this is necessary to
identify duplicate entries (public VPNs or proxies, for
instance).
> It's not clear to me why you are
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018, Dan Fandrich via curl-library wrote:
I'm not sure I see the difference between these two approaches. Can you
show them with some example URLs?
For example, + and ! are reserved characters in RFC 3986 but unreserved in
RFC 2326 (RTSP), so a generic canonicalization might
Daniel Stenberg via curl-library (Tue, 14 Aug 2018 09:39:21 +0200
(CEST)):
>I think its time we run some tests in an orderly fashion with different upload
>buffer sizes and collect some numbers...
I did not test if there is a difference on *nix. Did you? Anyway, I
agree with the fact that some
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
my tests indicated that increasing this value also influenced the FTP upload
speeds. From 10 to 5 seconds on XP in Daniel Jelinski's testcurl uploads.
And down to less than a second on Win 7 and Win 10.
Right. So yes, there's certainly a valid reason
10 matches
Mail list logo
