Re: CURL Keberos, how to build or download DLL?

2020-04-19 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Christian Schmitz via curl-library in gmane.comp.web.curl.library (Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:33:33 +0200): >I looked into the pre-built CURL DLLs for Windows. >But those I found on the website are all without Keberos. >The download website doesn't list the features enabled for each build. The curl by

Re: Looking for a HTTP test server which doesn't send Content-Length

2019-10-22 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Andreas Falkenhahn via curl-library in gmane.comp.web.curl.library (Sat, 19 Oct 2019 18:40:49 +0200): >Please excuse this slightly off-topic question but I think this is the best >place to ask about it ;) > >So unfortunately, my old test case HTTP server which sent HTTP responses >without >the

Re: [RELEASE] curl 7.66.0

2019-09-11 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Hi Christoph and Daniel, Christoph M. Becker (Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:20:36 +0200): >On 11.09.2019 at 13:36, Daniel Stenberg via curl-library wrote: > >> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019, Daniel Stenberg via curl-library wrote: >> Usng the winbuid system I am running into the error that nmake cannot

Re: [RELEASE] curl 7.66.0

2019-09-11 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Stenberg (Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:00:54 +0200 (CEST)): > o curl_version_info: offer quic (and h3) library info [38] > o see docs/KNOWN_BUGS (https://curl.haxx.se/docs/knownbugs.html) Usng the winbuid system I am running into the error that nmake cannot find vquic\ngtcp2.obj. I tried a lot of

Re: winbuild: Add MultiSSL support

2019-04-12 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library in gmane.comp.web.curl.library (Fri, 12 Apr 2019 23:07:42 +0200): >PR will follow soon. I just wanted to check here first. PR: https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/3772 >Daniel Stenberg via curl-library in gmane.comp.web.curl.library (Fri, 12 >Apr 2019 22:39

Re: winbuild: Add MultiSSL support

2019-04-12 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Stenberg via curl-library in gmane.comp.web.curl.library (Fri, 12 Apr 2019 22:39:37 +0200 (CEST)): >On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library wrote: > >> makefile.m32 and ./configure (when cross-compiling on *nix for Windows) >> already support MultiSSL. How

winbuild: Add MultiSSL support

2019-04-12 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
makefile.m32 and ./configure (when cross-compiling on *nix for Windows) already support MultiSSL. However the makefiles in /winbuild still prohibit it. It requires a small adjustment to enable it there too: https://github.com/Jan-E/cURL-winlibs/commit/3997fc006b3a3650f4b9bdb5b1f508ced04d00fb See

Re: Using Windows certificate store when compiling with openssl

2018-09-07 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Thomas Glanzmann via curl-library (Fri, 7 Sep 2018 12:57:24 +0200): >Hello Jan, > >> x64 builds with OpenSSL just use the Windows certificate store. That >> applies even to cross-compiled x64 builds. Try it yourself >> https://phpdev.toolsforresearch.com/curl-mingw32-7.61.1.zip > >I tried, but

Re: Using Windows certificate store when compiling with openssl

2018-09-07 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Stenberg via curl-library (Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:30:11 +0200 (CEST)): >I think it would be great to offer ability that to OpenSSL users on Windows. It is already there in x64 builds of curl with OpenSSL! -- Jan --- Unsubscribe:

Re: Using Windows certificate store when compiling with openssl

2018-09-07 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Juan Isoza via curl-library (Fri, 7 Sep 2018 08:57:48 +0200): >But curl build for windows with openssl need a --insecure parameters or a >custom certificate file. x64 builds with OpenSSL just use the Windows certificate store. That applies even to cross-compiled x64 builds. Try it yourself

Re: libssh2 optimization [was: Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?]

2018-09-02 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library (Sun, 26 Aug 2018 16:03:16 +0200): >Daniel Jelinski via curl-library (Sun, 26 Aug 2018 09:09:58 +0200): >>added 100ms: original 310kB/sec, patched 9900kB/sec > >Impressive results! Do you have a compiled version somewhere? I tried to build my own wit

Re: libssh2 optimization [was: Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?]

2018-08-30 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library (Sun, 26 Aug 2018 16:28:47 +0200): >Daniel Jelinski via curl-library (Sun, 26 Aug 2018 09:09:58 +0200): >>The patched version is CPU-bound on lower latencies; when the latency >>goes higher, SSH window becomes the limiting factor. I read that HPN

Re: libssh2 optimization [was: Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?]

2018-08-26 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Jelinski via curl-library (Sun, 26 Aug 2018 09:09:58 +0200): >The patched version is CPU-bound on lower latencies; when the latency >goes higher, SSH window becomes the limiting factor. I read that HPN >SSH should do better on high latency links, didn't try it out. A lot of PR's for

Re: libssh2 optimization [was: Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?]

2018-08-26 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Jelinski via curl-library (Sun, 26 Aug 2018 09:09:58 +0200): >added 100ms: original 310kB/sec, patched 9900kB/sec Impressive results! >The patched version is CPU-bound on lower latencies; when the latency >goes higher, SSH window becomes the limiting factor. I read that HPN >SSH should do

Re: libssh2 optimization [was: Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?]

2018-08-25 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Jelinski via curl-library (Sun, 26 Aug 2018 01:07:14 +0200): >sob., 11 sie 2018 o 01:05 Daniel Stenberg napisa?(a): >> It would require that libssh2 provides such an API, which it currently >> doesn't >> (and I don't know anyone working on it). > >Sent a PR to libssh2 for that:

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-18 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library (Wed, 15 Aug 2018 22:51:34 +0200): >Network connection: about 200 Mbits/s up, 200ms latency (speedtest.net) >Test file: 178 MB mp4 >Protocol: sftp > >iPad app 32 KB libssh2 buffer: 2147 seconds >iPad app 320 KB libssh2 buffer: 737 seconds >File

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-15 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Stenberg via curl-library (Tue, 14 Aug 2018 09:39:21 +0200 (CEST)): >I think its time we run some tests in an orderly fashion with different upload >buffer sizes and collect some numbers... Feedback on some informal upload tests from Phoenix, Arizona to Amsterdam, NL. High speed

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-14 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Stenberg via curl-library (Tue, 14 Aug 2018 12:02:46 +0200 (CEST)): > Size Seconds Improvement > > 16 KB2.522- > 64 KB1.281x 1.97 > 128 KB 1.095x 2.30 > 256 KB 0.938x 2.69 > 512 KB 0.860x 2.93 Thanks for the stats. It indicates that my choice

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-14 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Stenberg via curl-library (Tue, 14 Aug 2018 09:39:21 +0200 (CEST)): >I think its time we run some tests in an orderly fashion with different upload >buffer sizes and collect some numbers... I did not test if there is a difference on *nix. Did you? Anyway, I agree with the fact that some

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-13 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Stenberg via curl-library (Mon, 13 Aug 2018 23:37:56 +0200 (CEST)): >On Mon, 13 Aug 2018, Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library wrote: > >> Daniel Stenberg (Thu, 9 Aug 2018 16:55:38 +0200 (CEST)): >> -#define UPLOAD_BUFSIZE CURL_MAX_WRITE_SIZE >> +#define UPLOAD_BUFSIZE

Re: Windows and CA certificates

2018-08-13 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Jelinski via curl-library (Tue, 7 Aug 2018 23:11:25 +0200): >I recently started using HTTPS functionality with libcurl + openSSL; I >noticed that by default this combo does not use Windows certificates, >but instead wants to load them from CA bundle. I happened to notice that recent X64

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-13 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Stenberg (Thu, 9 Aug 2018 16:55:38 +0200 (CEST)): -#define UPLOAD_BUFSIZE CURL_MAX_WRITE_SIZE +#define UPLOAD_BUFSIZE (512*1024) @Daniel Stenberg: is there a reason that is stopping you from changing this in curl? -- Jan ---

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-12 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Stenberg via curl-library (Thu, 9 Aug 2018 16:55:38 +0200 (CEST)): >-#define UPLOAD_BUFSIZE CURL_MAX_WRITE_SIZE >+#define UPLOAD_BUFSIZE (512*1024) This extra patch also had major speed improvements for Daniel Jelinski's testcurl.bat. I have now included a fully static

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-11 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Jelinski via curl-library (Fri, 10 Aug 2018 22:59:22 +0200): >Ok, so let's put Linux to a test. Reality check from a CentOS 6 machine % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current Dload Upload Total SpentLeft

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-10 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library (Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:25:51 +0200): >running curl-mingw64 sftp > % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current > Dload Upload Total SpentLeft Speed >100 274M0 0 100 274M

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-10 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library (Fri, 10 Aug 2018 03:29:21 +0200): >Gisle Vanem via curl-library (Thu, 9 Aug 2018 18:31:12 +0200): >>Jan Ehrhardt wrote: >> >>>> Wow dude! 2 times faster than FileZilla now. >>>> >>>> Time decreased from 33.153s

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-09 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Gisle Vanem via curl-library (Thu, 9 Aug 2018 18:31:12 +0200): >Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > >>> Wow dude! 2 times faster than FileZilla now. >>> >>> Time decreased from 33.153s to 6.4 sec (same random 10 MByte file). >>> Versus approx. 5.3 sec for curl/FTP. >> >> Using SFTP? > >Yes: >curl.exe -k -#

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-09 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Gisle Vanem via curl-library (Thu, 9 Aug 2018 17:48:49 +0200): >Daniel Stenberg wrote: > >>  /* The upload buffer size, should not be smaller than CURL_MAX_WRITE_SIZE, >> as >>     it needs to hold a full buffer as could be sent in a write callback */ >> -#define UPLOAD_BUFSIZE

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-09 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Stenberg via curl-library (Thu, 9 Aug 2018 16:55:38 +0200 (CEST)): >On Thu, 9 Aug 2018, Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library wrote: > >> curl plain ftp patched 41 seconds >> curl patched sftp 1925 seconds > >Oh what a sad number there... =( > >A quick lit

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-09 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Gisle Vanem via curl-library (Thu, 9 Aug 2018 13:51:50 +0200): >Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > >>> 33.153s vs 5.4s for a 10 MByte file. >> >> Did you time how long Filezilla takes for the same action? Filezilla >> squeezes quite a lot over sftp-connections... > >11.4 sec!! snip >I must be using the wrong

Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?

2018-08-09 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Gisle Vanem via curl-library (Thu, 9 Aug 2018 01:42:18 +0200): >Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > >> I ended up with a Windows port of lftp, launched from a bash script. Curl >> sftp >> did resume, but was terribly slow. > >I also just tested with 'curl sftp//:' with the latest libssh2 >and the new