Private Donation for you; contact your benefactor with your donation code
VND/2015 [mariae.schaeffl...@aol.com] for claim
DISCLAIMER:
The information contained in this email may be subject to public disclosure
under the NHS Code of Openness or the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Unless
the
Hi!
While playing with npf I noticed that some (fragmented) ipv6 packets
would not be passed.
Tracking it down (a bit) i've found that simply activating npf without any rule
ntpctl start
'blocks' a
ping6 -s 2048 testhost
which worked w/o npf aktivated flawlessly.
BTW: ipv4 fragmented pack
isn't npf a bit young to be named in the same breath as ipfilter and
pf ? I'm not criticizing, but it seems a bit early to use it as an
argument for nixing pf. Happy to be persuaded I'm incorrect...
-bch
On 1/16/15, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Is there still much point in keeping pf(4) in NetBSD n
Is there still much point in keeping pf(4) in NetBSD now that we have
npf(4) (and also ipfilter(4))?
The last time it was updated was, according to the CHANGES files, in
2008, to the version coming with OpenBSD 4.2.
Thomas
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Manuel Bouyer
wrote:
> Hello,
> today I've done a network install of netbsd-7/i386 (over http) and it was
> not straitforward. In the http menu, I selected the right server and path,
> then choose "configure network". Here things did start to go wrong:
> - I choos
Hello Christos,
Christos Zoulas writes:
> Or we can just define IFM_UNKNOWN and use it.
Done. I have added it to if_alcreg.h. According to that
the max subtype can be 31. I have chosen this value (that does not
conflict with the ones defined in ... If someday there
will be more subtype the "31" u
Hello tech-net@, current-users@ and Jared[0],
my new laptop has an Atheros AR8171 PCIe Gigabit Ethernet card that ATM
is not supported in NetBSD.
Some months ago alc(4) driver in FreeBSD was modified in order to
support the 816x devices too.
I have tried to port the changes from FreeBSD to NetBSD a
