2015-08-18 23:41 GMT+02:00 Frank Wille :
> Indeed... there seems to be a problem. No media selected?
If a more recent phy driver doesn't fix it, I also found special
handling for IP1000 in FreeBSD's stge_miibus_readreg():
if (reg == STGE_PhyCtrl) {
/* XXX allow ip1000phy read STGE_PhyCtrl reg
2015-08-18 20:30 GMT+02:00 Frank Wille :
> What's wrong with stge(4)?
Compare our driver to the FreeBSD one, derived from us. It seems
FreeBSD's heavily improved in the meantime, but the changes were never
re-imported.
I try to summarise: We have no HW VLAN tagging, no jumbo frames (?),
the discus
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:32:40PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 06:16:48PM +, Michael van Elst wrote:
> > pr...@cam.ac.uk (Patrick Welche) writes:
> >
> > >I've been running a Sun Aug 9 2015 7.99.20/amd64 kernel with /home on
> > >cgd. I just rebooted with one built j
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 06:16:48PM +, Michael van Elst wrote:
> pr...@cam.ac.uk (Patrick Welche) writes:
>
> >I've been running a Sun Aug 9 2015 7.99.20/amd64 kernel with /home on
> >cgd. I just rebooted with one built just now with up to date source, and
> >fsck complains:
>
> >** /dev/rcgd0
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:03:55 +0100 (BST)
Robert Swindells wrote:
> There are some fixes in later versions of the OpenBSD driver that might
> help. Do you want a copy of the version I got to build ?
Yes, please.
> What does ifconfig(8) report for the PHY settings ?
Indeed... there seems to be
Patrick Welche wrote:
> I've been running a Sun Aug 9 2015 7.99.20/amd64 kernel with /home on
> cgd. I just rebooted with one built just now with up to date source, and
> fsck complains:
>
> ** /dev/rcgd0a
> BAD SUPER BLOCK: CAN'T FIND SUPERBLOCK
> /dev/rcgd0a: CANNOT FIGURE OUT SECTORS PER CYLIND
Frank Wille wrote:
>I compiled a recent generic sandpoint kernel with "patch-ipgphy-20100606"
>applied, to test it on my G600. It works, but the result is diappointing.
>The read-performance dropped dramatically and the write-performance doesn't
>increase either.
There are some fixes in later ver
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:13:17 +0200
Felix Deichmann wrote:
> 2015-08-18 14:35 GMT+02:00 Robert Swindells :
> > I have got it to build, starting from the latest version from OpenBSD,
> > are you able to test it ?
>
> Almost, I will get hardware until next week (and also plan to look
> into the der
pr...@cam.ac.uk (Patrick Welche) writes:
>I've been running a Sun Aug 9 2015 7.99.20/amd64 kernel with /home on
>cgd. I just rebooted with one built just now with up to date source, and
>fsck complains:
>** /dev/rcgd0a
>BAD SUPER BLOCK: CAN'T FIND SUPERBLOCK
Any more details about it? In partic
I've been running a Sun Aug 9 2015 7.99.20/amd64 kernel with /home on
cgd. I just rebooted with one built just now with up to date source, and
fsck complains:
** /dev/rcgd0a
BAD SUPER BLOCK: CAN'T FIND SUPERBLOCK
/dev/rcgd0a: CANNOT FIGURE OUT SECTORS PER CYLINDER
or after another try:
** /dev/r
Updating src tree:
P src/distrib/sets/lists/base/mi
P src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/mi
P src/distrib/sets/lists/debug/mi
P src/distrib/sets/lists/man/mi
U src/distrib/sets/lists/xcomp/md.evbarm
P src/distrib/sets/lists/xdebug/md.evbarm
P src/distrib/sets/lists/xdebug/md.evbarm.armeb
P src/external/g
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386
build failure.
The failure occurred on babylon5.NetBSD.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host,
using sources from CVS date 2015.08.18.12.01.16.
An extract from the build.sh output follows:
--- progress.o ---
--- dependall-usr.sbin ---
2015-08-18 14:35 GMT+02:00 Robert Swindells :
> I have got it to build, starting from the latest version from OpenBSD,
> are you able to test it ?
Almost, I will get hardware until next week (and also plan to look
into the derelict stge(4) if nobody with more experience is willing
to).
/sandpoint'
Felix Deichmann wrote:
>There is an open kern/42314, providing support for IC Plus
>IP1000A/IP1001 10/100/1000 PHY (from OpenBSD ipgphy).
>This would also improve NetBSD/sandpoint's DSM-G600 and CH3WNAS boxes
>with on-board IC1000A I guess, apart from even rarer PCI cards or few
>ABIT mainboards w
There is an open kern/42314, providing support for IC Plus
IP1000A/IP1001 10/100/1000 PHY (from OpenBSD ipgphy).
This would also improve NetBSD/sandpoint's DSM-G600 and CH3WNAS boxes
with on-board IC1000A I guess, apart from even rarer PCI cards or few
ABIT mainboards with this chip...
Any reason
Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 08:56:43 schrieben Sie:
> > is sufficient to let 'named' successfully bind to the IP address of the
> > "bge1" interface.
>
> Sounds like a named bug to me then.
hmm,
i use the "internal" version of bind as the pkgsrc variants without any hassle
- over their correlat
16 matches
Mail list logo
