On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
(Please keep me on the cc: when replying, otherwise we get 24-hour
lags such as this waiting for me to check list mail again)
OK.
... I'd keep the new ALIAS=evbearm* and remove the old ALIAS=evbarm*
lines, not provide both.
This ^^^ is actually why I
Would it be a problem for you if the alias names were changed?
--apb (Alan Barrett)
Not at all- I'll just regenerate my scripts. I was concerned that the
aliases would be removed period because technically they're redundant. The
aliases however, make generating my scripts easier.
On 7/25/14, 12:28 AM, Alan Barrett wrote:
I don't care which of the two you keep, but I think it's ugly to have
two aliases that mean the same thing.
After thinking about it some more, I've adopted your original
suggestion. Here's what I want to commit, probably tomorrow.
Index:
(Please keep me on the cc: when replying, otherwise we get 24-hour lags
such as this waiting for me to check list mail again)
On 7/23/14, 12:10 PM, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
Attached is the proposed diff to build.sh with the changes, including
hpcarm -
Accidentally forgot to Cc: the mailing list... whoops!
-Original Message-
From: William D. Jones
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 10:55 PM
To: Jeff Rizzo
Subject: Re: ARM ABI changes/combinations (was Re: Preparation for creating
netbsd-7 branch)
That said, if people don't care about
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Robert Swindells wrote:
I would prefer hpcarm to switch to MACHINE_ARCH=earmv4
Currently, build.sh would reject that as invalid. It knows the
following MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH settings for hpcarm:
MACHINE=hpcarm MACHINE_ARCH=armDEFAULT
MACHINE=hpcarm
On 7/22/14, 2:28 PM, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
So, what I am proposing:
- acorn26, acorn32, epoc32 remain MACHINE_ARCH=arm
- cats, netwinder, shark switch to MACHINE_ARCH=earmv4 (rename oabi
equiv to ocats, onetwinder, oshark)
- hpcarm, iyonix, zaurus switch to MACHINE_ARCH=earm(which is
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
Attached is the proposed diff to build.sh with the changes, including
hpcarm - MACHINE_ARCH=earmv4 .
This patch introduces many cases in which the same
MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH pair is listed under more than one ALIAS. I
don't see the point of that.
On 7/21/14, 4:28 AM, Nick Hudson wrote:
IMO, non-earm ABI builds should be dropped in favour of earm and a
subset of evbarm earm variants should be made available.
This seems reasonable, and I am also going to suggest that the defaults
change on those ports which are switching to EABI.
Jeff Rizzo wrote:
On 7/21/14, 4:28 AM, Nick Hudson wrote:
IMO, non-earm ABI builds should be dropped in favour of earm and a
subset of evbarm earm variants should be made available.
This seems reasonable, and I am also going to suggest that the defaults
change on those ports which are
Jeff Rizzo wrote:
On 7/22/14, 2:45 PM, Robert Swindells wrote:
I would prefer hpcarm to switch to MACHINE_ARCH=earmv4
Robert Swindells
noted. (may have been a transcription error on my part)
No, you didn't make an error transcribing it.
The current definitions in build.sh are:
11 matches
Mail list logo
