> On Nov 2, 2014, at 2:29 AM, Martin Husemann wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 02:23:58AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
>> (64-bit ARM). This means that it will be boot code for several
>> types of systems, and it will be the first quasi-MI bootcode. As
>> such, there is no existing obvious plac
From: "John Nemeth"
> As some people know, I've been working on adding UEFI support
to NetBSD.
Great! I was planning to look at ARMv8, but there are two blockers:
- clang changes pending (Joerg S. maintains it),
- UEFI that I know is done for FreeBSD.
Basic support for FreeB
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 02:23:58AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
> (64-bit ARM). This means that it will be boot code for several
> types of systems, and it will be the first quasi-MI bootcode. As
> such, there is no existing obvious place for where to put it. Let
> the bikeshedding begin...
I woul
As some people know, I've been working on adding UEFI support
to NetBSD. The work on gpt(8) was only the first portion. I have
other stuff that I will probably want to commit soon. This raises
the question of where to commit it. UEFI is found on the following
types of systems: ia64
