On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:28:02AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
[...]
> If things don't work for you, please file a PR with a description of your
> setup and how it fails, so we can fix it.
I have had some troubles with GPT setup I migrate my -current to
separate GPT partitions and wedges but b
In article <20140908120242.1123c17f...@rebar.astron.com>,
Christos Zoulas wrote:
>On Sep 8, 12:47pm, a...@absd.org (David Brownlee) wrote:
>-- Subject: Re: Wedges & sysinst (Was: Wedges enabled on -current)
>
>| Its been three weeks since wedges mbr and disklabels was
On Sep 14, 3:37pm, p...@vps1.whooppee.com (Paul Goyette) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Wedges enabled on -current
| On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Christos Zoulas wrote:
|
| > Hi,
| >
| > Now that we have branched 7, I am planning to enable full wedge support
| > ...
|
| Just out of curiousity, h
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Hi,
Now that we have branched 7, I am planning to enable full wedge support
...
Just out of curiousity, how does this affect raidframe? And auto-detect
of existing raid sets? (And more especially, booting from the raidset!)
My main server machi
Date:Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:12:32 +0100
From:Justin Cormack
Message-ID:
| There are some gpt options, in partition manager you can switch from
| MBR to GPT.
I know (from reading the sources) that it is supposed to be there (and
I think "switch from mbr" should wor
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 08:25:24AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
>> I cannot get any mention of gpt partitioning to appear anywhere - using
>> an amd64 xen domU install kernel 7.99.1 (from a day or two ago).
>
> It checks wether some binaries a
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 08:25:24AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> I cannot get any mention of gpt partitioning to appear anywhere - using
> an amd64 xen domU install kernel 7.99.1 (from a day or two ago).
It checks wether some binaries are available in $PATH and hides menus
(for gpt, lvm, cgd, ...) si
Date:Sat, 23 Aug 2014 14:15:14 +0200
From:Martin Husemann
Message-ID: <20140823121514.gc21...@mail.duskware.de>
| Sysinst allows creating gpt partitions already,
I had never seen any sign of that, but I knew that could have been
just from a lack of observation (exp
On Sep 8, 12:47pm, a...@absd.org (David Brownlee) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Wedges & sysinst (Was: Wedges enabled on -current)
| Its been three weeks since wedges mbr and disklabels was enabled in
| current, breaking sysinst installs.
|
| If people do not have time to look at updating sysinst r
agr...@poofygoof.com ("Aaron J. Grier") writes:
>> The major issue with this is that while it creates a full set of links
>> at startup, devpubd doesn't see later changes to the partitioning,
>> just device attach/detach events like the wedge autodiscover code.
>kernel not propagating partition e
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 09:21:28AM +, Michael van Elst wrote:
> agr...@poofygoof.com ("Aaron J. Grier") writes:
>
> >generate links to devices (or wedges as the case may be) in
> >/dev/disk/by-* at boot time, and mount with those.
>
> I can offer:
[...]
> That's the script /libexec/devpubd-ho
agr...@poofygoof.com ("Aaron J. Grier") writes:
>generate links to devices (or wedges as the case may be) in
>/dev/disk/by-* at boot time, and mount with those.
I can offer:
12676 2 drwxr-xr-x3 root wheel 512
Aug 24 12:43 /dev/wedges/
12104 0 lrw
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 07:54:48AM +, Michael van Elst wrote:
> agr...@poofygoof.com ("Aaron J. Grier") writes:
>
> >On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:28:02AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> >> If things work fine for you, you should eventually edit your fstab and
> >> modify your entries to be of th
agr...@poofygoof.com ("Aaron J. Grier") writes:
>On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:28:02AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> If things work fine for you, you should eventually edit your fstab and
>> modify your entries to be of the form NAME= instead of
>> hard-coded devices (yes, for the traditional part
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:28:02AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> If things work fine for you, you should eventually edit your fstab and
> modify your entries to be of the form NAME= instead of
> hard-coded devices (yes, for the traditional partition schemes these
> are the names of the devices...
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 06:20:39AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> I suspect that (instead of enabling auto wedge detection on existing labels
> as the next step forward - ie: undoing what was recently done) sysinst be
> updated (for i386 and amd64 at least) to offer GPT instead of disklabel
> installs
On Aug 23, 6:20am, k...@munnari.oz.au (Robert Elz) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Wedges & sysinst (Was: Wedges enabled on -current)
| I had been meaning to ask that too, but with a slightly different emphasis.
|
| I suspect that (instead of enabling auto wedge detection on existing labels
| as
Date:Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:00:52 +0100
From:David Brownlee
Message-ID:
| Is there a plan to update sysinst?
I had been meaning to ask that too, but with a slightly different emphasis.
I suspect that (instead of enabling auto wedge detection on existing labels
as t
On 18 August 2014 07:28, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that we have branched 7, I am planning to enable full wedge support for
> kernels that used wedges before. What this means is that disks with mbr and
> bsd labels will now create dkN devices for each partition in found. This
> should be
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|wedgelist="$(dkctl "$disk" listwedges)"
|if [ $? = 0 ]; then
You mean -eq here i presume.
It makes no difference. -eq is a numeric test, and = is a string test.
"0" compares equal to "0" either way. Since the shall has the values as
strin
Alan Barrett wrote:
|On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Thomas Klausner wrote:
|>I have scripts that mount images via vnd + cgd. So far I have been
|>using fixed numbers for the vnd and cgd devices I use, making sure I
|>don't use them for other purposes.
|>
|>Now this doesn't work any longer, because as
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Thomas Klausner wrote:
I have scripts that mount images via vnd + cgd. So far I have been
using fixed numbers for the vnd and cgd devices I use, making sure I
don't use them for other purposes.
Now this doesn't work any longer, because as soon as vnd is created, a
dk device
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:28:02AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Now that we have branched 7, I am planning to enable full wedge support for
> kernels that used wedges before. What this means is that disks with mbr and
> bsd labels will now create dkN devices for each partition in found. This
> s
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 05:50:38PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
>
> (where in the example "sb2k5Root" is the disklabel name of sd0)
This seems likely to cause problems, because on systems with many
identical disks, the label names previously could be non-unique; and
on most people's systems, pro
Date:Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:"Thomas Mueller"
Message-ID: <959079.28761...@smtp115.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
| Also, NAME does not work with mount_msdos as in
| mount_msdos NAME=WD2G02 /media/zip0 # does not work, but
| mount -t msdos NAME=WD2G
> Now that we have branched 7, I am planning to enable full wedge support for
> kernels that used wedges before. What this means is that disks with mbr and
> bsd labels will now create dkN devices for each partition in found. This
> should be generally transparent, because fstab offers backwards co
On Aug 18, 7:03pm, w...@netbsd.org (Thomas Klausner) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Wedges enabled on -current
| On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:54:00PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > In article <20140818155038.gq3...@mail.duskware.de>,
| > Martin Husemann wrote:
| > >On Mon, Aug 18,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:54:00PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20140818155038.gq3...@mail.duskware.de>,
> Martin Husemann wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 08:41:35AM -0700, Brian Buhrow wrote:
> >>Hello. Could you provide an example of what you expect an /etc/fstab
> >> file
In article <20140818155038.gq3...@mail.duskware.de>,
Martin Husemann wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 08:41:35AM -0700, Brian Buhrow wrote:
>> Hello. Could you provide an example of what you expect an /etc/fstab
>> file entry to look like before and after your suggested edits?
>
>before it w
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 08:41:35AM -0700, Brian Buhrow wrote:
> Hello. Could you provide an example of what you expect an /etc/fstab
> file entry to look like before and after your suggested edits?
before it would use sd0a and sd0b (or wd*), after:
NAME=sb2k5Root/a/ ffs r
Hello. Could you provide an example of what you expect an /etc/fstab
file entry to look like before and after your suggested edits?
-thanks
-Brian
On Aug 18, 2:28am, Christos Zoulas wrote:
} Subject: Wedges enabled on -current
} Hi,
}
} Now that we have branched 7, I am planning to
Hi,
Now that we have branched 7, I am planning to enable full wedge support for
kernels that used wedges before. What this means is that disks with mbr and
bsd labels will now create dkN devices for each partition in found. This
should be generally transparent, because fstab offers backwards compa
32 matches
Mail list logo
