At Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:56:59 +0200, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:
Subject: Re: GCC 10 available for testing etc. in -current.
>
> Same for me; I've never had trouble with CVS trees and they always just work
> and update fine.
>
> Hg on the otherhand I had to delete and recheckout my
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 04:39:45PM +1200, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
> Someone moved the bookmark called "@" in a way that Mercurial wasn't willing
> to blindly propagate into my local, central copy of the Mercurial src
> repository. This could easily have been done by part of the CVS to Mercurial
>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 04:41:32AM -, Michael van Elst wrote:
> ll...@must-have-coffee.gen.nz (Lloyd Parkes) writes:
>
> >On 17/04/21 6:30 pm, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
> >> I am using the Mercurial repository at https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src
> >> for fetching the source code because it's nice and
ll...@must-have-coffee.gen.nz (Lloyd Parkes) writes:
>On 17/04/21 6:30 pm, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
>> I am using the Mercurial repository at https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src
>> for fetching the source code because it's nice and quick
>I've been running CVS for more than two hours now, and it has
On 19/04/21 10:21 am, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
On 17/04/21 6:30 pm, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
I am using the Mercurial repository at https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src
for fetching the source code because it's nice and quick
So I'm now downloading the source code through CVS instead of
Mercurial because
> On 17/04/21 6:30 pm, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
> > I am using the Mercurial repository at https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src for
> > fetching the source code because it's nice and quick
> So I'm now downloading the source code through CVS instead of Mercurial
> because nobody else seems to be having the
On 17/04/21 6:30 pm, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
I am using the Mercurial repository at https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src
for fetching the source code because it's nice and quick
So I'm now downloading the source code through CVS instead of Mercurial
because nobody else seems to be having the same
> > - build.sh with no -u (update), and set -V HAVE-GCC=10 as a
> >option. this ensures that everything is actually rebuilt
> >with the new compiler.
>
> I'm guessing that should be "-V HAVE_GCC=10", but even so I just can't
yup!
> get this to build. I always get the message "cc:
On 15/04/21 2:19 pm, matthew green wrote:
the steps are fairly simple:
- update -currnet srcs
- build.sh with no -u (update), and set -V HAVE-GCC=10 as a
option. this ensures that everything is actually rebuilt
with the new compiler.
I'm guessing that should be "-V HAVE_GCC=10", but
hi folks.
(please reply privately to this spams-many-lists message, and
i will keep src/external/gpl3/gcc/README.gcc10 updated with
the latest status.)
i've just commited the final parts that make most platforms build
(and many run) with GCC 10 as the system compiler.
i've tested these
10 matches
Mail list logo
