On 23.05.2020 02:08, matthew sporleder wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 5:57 PM Greg A. Woods wrote:
>>
>> At Thu, 21 May 2020 15:11:41 -0400, Andrew Cagney
>> wrote:
>> Subject: Re: github.com/NetBSD/src 5 days old?
>>>
>>> The details are all found
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 5:57 PM Greg A. Woods wrote:
>
> At Thu, 21 May 2020 15:11:41 -0400, Andrew Cagney
> wrote:
> Subject: Re: github.com/NetBSD/src 5 days old?
> >
> > The details are all found here:
> > https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-repository/2020/02/1
At Thu, 21 May 2020 15:11:41 -0400, Andrew Cagney
wrote:
Subject: Re: github.com/NetBSD/src 5 days old?
>
> The details are all found here:
> https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-repository/2020/02/17/msg000685.html
That just says what might happen (and what could/should happen at the
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 23:25, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>
> At Mon, 27 Apr 2020 21:32:11 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Subject: Re: github.com/NetBSD/src 5 days old?
> >
> > This is an old discussion. If you are interested in this, read the
> > archives of the t
On 18/05/2020 14:03, matthew sporleder wrote:
If you want small and fast you can use shallow clone and, although you
get the entire tree's bundle, it is small and fast.
You can then use --sparse to build a "sparse" (kernel only or
whatever) limited checkout (aka working dir) -- (new git
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 8:08 PM Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 09:23, Hauke Fath
> wrote:
>>
>> [re-directing to tech-repository, which was created precisely to keep
>> debates like this one off the other lists...]
>>
>> On Thu, 14 May 2020 14:47:02 +0200, Jens Rehsack
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 09:23, Hauke Fath
wrote:
> [re-directing to tech-repository, which was created precisely to keep
> debates like this one off the other lists...]
>
> On Thu, 14 May 2020 14:47:02 +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> > I doubt that you'll find a modern solution running fine on any
I would be very happy if a decision would be taken in a timely manner. I prefer
git over mercurial, but any of them is better than cvs.
> Am 14.05.2020 um 17:27 schrieb Martin Husemann :
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:16:31PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>> I.e. the final repo DAG should
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:16:31PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> I.e. the final repo DAG should contain all submitted commits, and all
> that history should be visible to those who look for it (just as is the
> case with merges from github "pull requests").
This is the case in our setup. In the
At Wed, 13 May 2020 22:11:20 -0400, John Franklin wrote:
Subject: Re: ongoing git vs hg (was: github.com/NetBSD/src 5 days old?)
>
> Put another way, it’s nothing more than “please consider the changes
> in branch jqcoder/foo for inclusion in your project.” Any DVCS that
> can han
On May 14, 2020, at 09:07, Hauke Fath wrote:
>
> [re-directing to tech-repository, which was created precisely to keep
> debates like this one off the other lists...]
My apologies. I’ll continue this thread on tech-repository.
jf
--
John Franklin
frank...@elfie.org
[re-directing to tech-repository, which was created precisely to keep
debates like this one off the other lists...]
On Thu, 14 May 2020 14:47:02 +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> I doubt that you'll find a modern solution running fine on any 4M computer.
> Network filesystems, cross compilers etc.
On May 14, 2020, at 09:26, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:11:14PM -0400, John Franklin wrote:
>> There are scalability issues with Mercurial, too. I cloned NetBSD src
>> on a 1GB RAM, 1GB swap, 4 CPU VM (Debian Buster) using git from the
>> GitHub project and from
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:11:14PM -0400, John Franklin wrote:
> There are scalability issues with Mercurial, too. I cloned NetBSD src
> on a 1GB RAM, 1GB swap, 4 CPU VM (Debian Buster) using git from the
> GitHub project and from anonhg.netbsd.org.
You are comparing Apples and Oranges. The
> Am 14.05.2020 um 04:52 schrieb matthew sporleder :
>
>
>
>> On May 13, 2020, at 10:11 PM, John Franklin wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2020, at 21:28, bch wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought the plan to move to HG hasn't been finalised yet, am I missing
>>> something? Plus, why HG and not Fossil, if
> On May 13, 2020, at 10:11 PM, John Franklin wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 2020, at 21:28, bch wrote:
>>
>> I thought the plan to move to HG hasn't been finalised yet, am I missing
>> something? Plus, why HG and not Fossil, if the end-result consumption is
>> via Git anyways?
>>
>> Last I
On May 13, 2020, at 17:56, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>
> At Wed, 13 May 2020 21:30:29 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Subject: Re: ongoing git vs hg (was: github.com/NetBSD/src 5 days old?)
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:21:50PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>>>
On Apr 30, 2020, at 21:28, bch wrote:
>
> I thought the plan to move to HG hasn't been finalised yet, am I missing
> something? Plus, why HG and not Fossil, if the end-result consumption is via
> Git anyways?
>
> Last I heard fossil had scaling issues due to the large number of artifacts
>
At Wed, 13 May 2020 21:30:29 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Subject: Re: ongoing git vs hg (was: github.com/NetBSD/src 5 days old?)
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:21:50PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > At Wed, 13 May 2020 14:14:16 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >
> &g
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:21:50PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> At Wed, 13 May 2020 14:14:16 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> > I have no idea what the OP is talking about. Mercurial doesn't have pull
> > requests, neither does git BTW. So this is about some specific web UI or
> > review
At Wed, 13 May 2020 14:14:16 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Subject: Re: ongoing git vs hg (was: github.com/NetBSD/src 5 days old?)
>
> The staging area is a general point of contention, even in the git
> world. Interactive commits (commit -i) and incrementally amending
> changes
At Wed, 13 May 2020 07:53:28 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Subject: Re: ongoing git vs hg (was: github.com/NetBSD/src 5 days old?)
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 08:55:05PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > For one, Mercurial has no staging area. That removes one level of
> >
> Am 13.05.2020 um 05:55 schrieb Greg A. Woods :
>
> At Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:50:55 +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> Subject: Re: github.com/NetBSD/src 5 days old?
>>
>> As a reminder, hg/git offer far better interoperability (than CVS).
>> Much of my own NetBSD work
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 08:55:05PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> For one, Mercurial has no staging area. That removes one level of
> the three-level hierarchy from my toolset. It’s hard to identify
> exactly when in my workflow this causes issues, but I’ve started to
> notice it.
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 08:55:05PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> For one, Mercurial has no staging area. That removes one level of
> the three-level hierarchy from my toolset. It’s hard to identify
> exactly when in my workflow this causes issues, but I’ve started to
> notice it.
At Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:50:55 +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
Subject: Re: github.com/NetBSD/src 5 days old?
>
> As a reminder, hg/git offer far better interoperability (than CVS).
> Much of my own NetBSD work is done on Git, and even if I don't stop
> doing this, I would be happier if
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 17:44 Constantine A. Murenin
wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 12:20, wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:30:48PM +1000, Paul Ripke wrote:
>> > I switched away from cvsup a while back, but I now see that github
>> > NetBSD/src mirror is now 5 days old. Known issue?
>>
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 04:09:38AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Mercurial has a problem which may be resolved in a future release, if it
> hasn't already: dependency on the deprecated Python 2.7.
The information you read is outdated.
The pkgsrc package already builds hg against python 3.7.
from "Constantine A. Murenin" :
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 12:20, wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:30:48PM +1000, Paul Ripke wrote:
> > > I switched away from cvsup a while back, but I now see that github
> > > NetBSD/src mirror is now 5 days old. Known issue?
> > Yes, I believe joerg and
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 12:20, wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:30:48PM +1000, Paul Ripke wrote:
> > I switched away from cvsup a while back, but I now see that github
> > NetBSD/src mirror is now 5 days old. Known issue?
>
> Yes, I believe joerg and spz are changing the conversion from
>
> Am 28.04.2020 um 10:50 schrieb m...@netbsd.org :
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 08:30:43AM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 28.04.2020 um 08:29 schrieb Andreas Gustafsson :
>>>
>>> m...@netbsd.org wrote:
Yes, I believe joerg and spz are changing the conversion from
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 08:30:43AM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
>
>
> > Am 28.04.2020 um 08:29 schrieb Andreas Gustafsson :
> >
> > m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> >> Yes, I believe joerg and spz are changing the conversion from
> >> cvs->??->git to hg->git, to match what will be done once we stop using
> Am 28.04.2020 um 08:29 schrieb Andreas Gustafsson :
>
> m...@netbsd.org wrote:
>> Yes, I believe joerg and spz are changing the conversion from
>> cvs->??->git to hg->git, to match what will be done once we stop using
>> CVS.
>
> Has there been a formal decision choosing hg over git?
I am
m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> Yes, I believe joerg and spz are changing the conversion from
> cvs->??->git to hg->git, to match what will be done once we stop using
> CVS.
Has there been a formal decision choosing hg over git?
--
Andreas Gustafsson, g...@gson.org
> This is an old discussion. If you are interested in this, read the
> archives of the tech-repository mailing list.
> https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-repository/tindex.html
> Short version: we're migrating to hg, it goes slowly, but progress is made.
> Cheers,
> Thomas (Klausner)
That URL
At Mon, 27 Apr 2020 21:32:11 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Subject: Re: github.com/NetBSD/src 5 days old?
>
> This is an old discussion. If you are interested in this, read the
> archives of the tech-repository mailing list.
>
> https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-repository/tinde
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 07:24:30PM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > > Then what will be the primary way to track NetBSD src and pkgsrc trees?
>
> > > Now it's CVS, mirrored to git. What will replace CVS, will it be git,
> > > hg, or something else, and will it be in the base system, or will it
> > Then what will be the primary way to track NetBSD src and pkgsrc trees?
> > Now it's CVS, mirrored to git. What will replace CVS, will it be git, hg,
> > or something else, and will it be in the base system, or will it have to be
> > built or pkg_add'ed from pkgsrc?
> > Is it a matter
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:26:38PM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:30:48PM +1000, Paul Ripke wrote:
> > I switched away from cvsup a while back, but I now see that github
> > NetBSD/src mirror is now 5 days old. Known issue?
>
> m...@netbsd.org responded:
>
> > Yes, I
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 05:19:48PM +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:30:48PM +1000, Paul Ripke wrote:
> > I switched away from cvsup a while back, but I now see that github
> > NetBSD/src mirror is now 5 days old. Known issue?
>
> Yes, I believe joerg and spz are changing
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:30:48PM +1000, Paul Ripke wrote:
> I switched away from cvsup a while back, but I now see that github
> NetBSD/src mirror is now 5 days old. Known issue?
m...@netbsd.org responded:
> Yes, I believe joerg and spz are changing the conversion from
> cvs->??->git to
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:30:48PM +1000, Paul Ripke wrote:
> I switched away from cvsup a while back, but I now see that github
> NetBSD/src mirror is now 5 days old. Known issue?
Yes, I believe joerg and spz are changing the conversion from
cvs->??->git to hg->git, to match what will be done
I switched away from cvsup a while back, but I now see that github
NetBSD/src mirror is now 5 days old. Known issue?
Thanks,
--
Paul Ripke
"Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds
discuss people."
-- Disputed: Often attributed to Eleanor Roosevelt. 1948.
43 matches
Mail list logo
