On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:31:41PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> I've tried to get my terminal+tmux to display true colors today using
> the latest terminfo as imported to NetBSD.
I debugged this a bit further. It works fine if I just use two
entries, but as soon as a third in the style of
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024, RVP wrote:
(xterm-direct analyzed this way also only reports
xterm-direct|xterm with direct-color indexing,
...
colors#0x7fff, cols#80, it#8, lines#24, pairs#0x7fff,
...
)
Same bug, I think: if any num. capability has a value >0x7fff
(INT16_MAX), then that
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024, Martin Husemann wrote:
This is fallout from usr.bin/tic.c:
--
revision 1.33
date: 2020-03-27 16:11:57 +0100; author: christos; state: Exp; lines: +21
-17; commitid: 2Q6C4aNTDvrFf32C;
As described in tech-userlevel:
- Store new format entries
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 03:13:42PM +, RVP wrote:
> This looks like a bug in NetBSD. Minimal reproducer:
>
> ```
> $ cat tit
> tit|TermInfo Test,
> # if the second number is >32767, it disappears!
> use=num, use=max,
> # putting the bigger one first makes "promotion" happen.
> #
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, Thomas Klausner wrote:
infocmp kitty+setal
kitty+setal|set underline colors (nonstandard),
Compare that to terminfo.src:
kitty+setal|set underline colors (nonstandard),
setal=\E[58:2::%p1%{65536}%/%d:%p1%{256}%/%{255}%&%d:%p1
%{255}%&%dm,
Seems like
