Completely agree that the participants must own what they contribute to the
CVE list.
That ownership/attribution should be clearly visible on the (new) CVE.org
site.
Consumers of a poorly written (vague, unactionable) CVE entry should talk
to the CNA and not blame the CVE Program or MITRE.
This is
el.com
> Keybase: katienoble
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Landfield, Kent (Enterprise)
> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2021 10:19 AM
> To: Gazlay, Jay ; Manion, Art ;
> Chandan B.N. ; CVE Editorial Board
> Discussion
> Subject: Re: public reference requirement
>
>
+1.
I suggest forwarding the slides and recording from last week's workshop (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPpnfqmAdsQ) prior to the meeting.
Thank you,
Chandan
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 8:52 AM Kris Britton wrote:
> Sorry for the delayed response.I believe that I can support (as AWG
> Ch