On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:29:13PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:05:24PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 02:09:28PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:58:13PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote:
The library component of Haddock is
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 01:23:42PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:29:13PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:05:24PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 02:09:28PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:58:13PM +0200,
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 02:09:28PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:58:13PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote:
The library component of Haddock is still not build with GHC. Would it
be sane to build/include the library component of Haddock with GHC, so
that there is only one
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:05:24PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 02:09:28PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:58:13PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote:
The library component of Haddock is still not build with GHC. Would it
be sane to build/include the
On 21/09/2012 11:46, Simon Hengel wrote:
TL;DR We have a regression in Haddock. It does not hyperlink ()
anymore. Any idea what could have introduced that?
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 02:38:11PM +0200, David Waern wrote:
2012/8/28 Simon Hengel s...@typeful.net:
I guess (c) was an intended
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 02:38:11PM +0200, David Waern wrote:
Hi Simon,
2012/8/28 Simon Hengel s...@typeful.net:
The following issues still persist:
(e) The library component does not build anymore, due to a refactoring
of Main.hs, which was done in:
commit
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 02:38:11PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 21/09/2012 11:46, Simon Hengel wrote:
TL;DR We have a regression in Haddock. It does not hyperlink ()
anymore. Any idea what could have introduced that?
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 02:38:11PM +0200, David Waern wrote:
2012/8/28
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:58:13PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote:
The library component of Haddock is still not build with GHC. Would it
be sane to build/include the library component of Haddock with GHC, so
that there is only one build flavor of Haddock?
I suspect the current setup predates
Hi Simon,
2012/8/28 Simon Hengel s...@typeful.net:
The following issues still persist:
(e) The library component does not build anymore, due to a refactoring
of Main.hs, which was done in:
commit 315338287ea84b525da7d8fa8252cc9ec99597bb
Author: Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li
On 28/08/2012 21:30, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Simon Hengel s...@typeful.net wrote:
Hi,
we have several issues on Haddock's ghc-7.6 branch. I fixed some of
those, but some still persist.
Isolated, none of those issues are a big deal. But combined they are.
Is
Hi,
we have several issues on Haddock's ghc-7.6 branch. I fixed some of
those, but some still persist.
Isolated, none of those issues are a big deal. But combined they are.
Is there a way we can prevent situations like this in the future? Would
it work to establish the convention that if you
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Simon Hengel s...@typeful.net wrote:
Hi,
we have several issues on Haddock's ghc-7.6 branch. I fixed some of
those, but some still persist.
Isolated, none of those issues are a big deal. But combined they are.
Is there a way we can prevent situations like
12 matches
Mail list logo
