at to release 2.1. We would love to use CXF provide we are able to get a
stable release for 2.1 at the earliest.
Srinivas
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/CXF-2.1-Release-Date-tp16826273p16834739.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:
http://www.nabble.com/CXF-2.1-Release-Date-tp16826273p16826273.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If things go well with the TCK's and stuff tonight, I'll be doing the
build tomorrow. Then the vote for a few days
Dan
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, smodekurti wrote:
Hi there,
I belong to the enterprise architecture team of a large retail
corporation. We are in the process of adopting a
Dan,
Thank you very much for the quick response. What could be a possible date
for official release after tomorrow's build, provided no road blocks.
Srinivas
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If things go well with the TCK's and stuff tonight, I'll be doing
I would say Monday. It's normally 72 hours for the vote, but that
places it on the weekend. My honey do list is already too long for
the weekend so I probably won't get to do the uploads and syncs and
stuff till Monday.
Dan
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Vasu Modekurti wrote:
Dan,
Thank you
Sounds good for us. Thank you
Srinivas
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say Monday. It's normally 72 hours for the vote, but that
places it on the weekend. My honey do list is already too long for
the weekend so I probably won't get to do the
On Tuesday 01 April 2008, Vincenzo Vitale wrote:
Hi,
was the 2.1 released postponed?
Quick update about that.
There are currently two JAX-WS TCK failures with the 2.1 codebase.
However, they are bugs in the TCK and we have started the challenge
process, but we have not yet received an