CS: Legal-Range Safety Certification

2000-10-09 Thread Derek Bernard
From: "Derek Bernard", [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do the MoD have juristiction over ranges on Jersey? That's a bit odd. And presumably you can't get lottery funding there either. On the Isle of Man the police do range approvals. Steve. Offficially the MoD only have

CS: Legal-Range Safety Certification

2000-10-08 Thread Derek Bernard
From: "Derek Bernard", [EMAIL PROTECTED] "JSP 403 is only concerned with the building of ranges to the correct spec, to give the best possible degree of safety to both the shooters and members of the public. The Technical Advisory Section (TAS), School of Infantry, Warminster, are the people

CS: Legal-Range Safety Certification

2000-09-29 Thread SHJIG
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would like to try and clear the ground somewhat, with regard to range certification. There appears to be a fair bit of scaremongering going on, and it is of no benefit to anyone. Pam 21 is the manual for range conduct and practice, it has no bearing on range

CS: Legal-Range Safety Certification

2000-09-28 Thread Alex Hamilton
From: "Alex Hamilton", [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have heard from a reliable source that the new requirement is in the pipeline requiring all ranges to have 600 yds danger area behind the butts, or where this is not possible a 100 foot wall. The really sinister implication is that where a

CS: Legal-Range Safety Certification

2000-09-28 Thread Jeremy
From: Jeremy Peter Howells, [EMAIL PROTECTED] This sounds suspiciously like Joint Services Proposal 202 (JSP 202). The new military specification for a no danger area range. I do not have the full requirements but it does not affect current range safety certificates only new builds and

CS: Legal-Range Safety Certification

2000-09-27 Thread Alex Hamilton
From: "Alex Hamilton", [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have heard from a reliable source that the new requirement is in the pipeline requiring all ranges to have 600 yds danger area behind the butts, or where this is not possible a 100 foot wall. The really sinister implication is that where a