--- Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
Hi Markus,
I am using these distributions in my propriatory software:
Your proprietary software will need to have a GPL license if it uses any
library compiled with Cygwin1.dll dependencies. Your proprietary
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:39:18AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
Chris,
Did we ever get meta packages enabled in Cygwin setup that are essentially
file-less packages (e.g. XFree86 Minimum Install, XFree86 Standard Install,
etc.) that depend on other packages?
Yep, as Robert indicated, this has been
Gerrit P. Haase writes:
I don't think that there is missing s.th, I can bunzip it without
error and then untar it without error, just getting this error from
tar when using tar xjf tei...tar.bz2
I repackaged it and it is the same then... probably a bug in tar?
It is only the one
Christopher Faylor writes:
Can you point me to a place in the cygwin package documentation which
indicates that p4-1 is a valid version number? It isn't as far as
my understanding is concerned and I'd lke to rectify that. I don't
see any way to unambiguously parse something like that.
Corinna Vinschen writes:
Package? Persion? Ok, ok...
In OpenSSH-3.2p1 it means portable to delimit from the plain
OpenBSD version, perhaps here it's something similar...
The TEI homepage says about an older version of the DTD:
The TEI's Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and
Charles Wilson wrote:
1) move gettext from the contrib directory to the latest directory --
and see if anybody barfs.
I did this. It's been many moons and many point releases (and a major
release) since the last time we moved a package directory (ncurses, I
think) from contrib to
I'm shooting for the end of the week.
Earnie.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
We really need a new w32api release soon.
Are there any plans to release one? The last release seems to have been
in December of 2001 and there have been many changes since then.
cgf
Hallo Christopher,
Could it be that setup cannot handle the version string p4-1? This
should be legal as far as I understand the Cygwin package
documentation, but then I might have misunderstood something. Should I
change the version string or should the setup maintainers look at
their parser
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
It is still dubious for me.
Setup was able to fetch it from the server during 'Download only' with
version number '1'. But when doing an install from local directory it
wasn't offered anymore in the chooser.
IIRC Setup is able to install packages even if there is
Hi,
Markus wrote:
I fixed the path error in the tei-xml package. Could you please update
the package in your repository.
I've updated the version on http://www.toomanysecrets.net/~foster/cygwin/
Blue skies,
Jon
--
The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at
the ground and
Okay, it's been a week -- and nobody seems to have noticed. That's
promising. So, I'll go out on a limb here, and predict that cgf's
massive reorg of the sourceware/cygwin dir structure won't
upset setup
(no pun intended).
Urrgh.
However, it may upset people who are anal
about
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:05:19AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
But those are social problems, not technical ones.
And ones I have little sympathy for. Setup is a technical tool, not a
social one. It's not aimed at being the best downloader, only the best
installer. Mirroring that handles
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:10 AM
The only thing I can think of to do is to get rid of
latest/contrib and move to something else, like 'release',
with all of the current directories located
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:53:28AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:10 AM
The only thing I can think of to do is to get rid of
latest/contrib and move to something else, like
Well it shouldn't. There is definitely something wrong with setup and
downloads at the moment, but I haven't tracked it down yet.
What about the this page intentionally left blank report? Is that
on your list?
My patch of ~ a week ago puts that one out of our misery permanently.
--
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:16:32PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Well it shouldn't. There is definitely something wrong with setup and
downloads at the moment, but I haven't tracked it down yet.
What about the this page intentionally left blank report? Is that on
your list?
My patch of ~ a
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Yep, as Robert indicated, this has been possible for a while.
For Cygwin/XFree86, what I'd like to do is have you all come up with
a few .tar.bz2 files which install into a /usr/X11R6,
/etc/X11, etc.
I repackaged the current .tgz files as .tar.bz2 files. I
-Original Message-
From: Ian Burrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:49 AM
Is it possible to have multiple packages in a subdirectory and
setup.hint file? Or does each package needs its own directory?
Each package needs it's own directory.
For a
-Original Message-
From: Ian Burrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:57 AM
That is a list of subdirectories. But it won't work since the each
package needs its own subdirectory. A better hiearchy would use the
components from the package names.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:56:36PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
I'm not clear not the hierarchy there - that reads like a list to me.
You've got two clauses you can independently use to make a hierarchy and
package dependencies - category:(i.e. the devel tarball belongs in
Ian Burrell wrote:
That is a list of subdirectories. But it won't work since the each
package needs its own subdirectory. A better hiearchy would use the
components from the package names. Hopefully, multiple levels of
subdirectories will work.
Yep. Subdirs work fine. For instance,
Robert Collins wrote:
They were simple changes to the script I wrote to repackage the
distributed archives. I'll try to write proper setup.hint
files for all
the packages.
Cool.
I'm unclear about how the -src packages (are/should be) handled, since
there are a great many binary
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:22:30PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Now, this works, and upset/setup are happy (every binary package has a
src package) but it is hackish, ugly, and a pain to maintain. Is
there a better solution? (Or can we discard the psuedo-src packages
without repurcussion?
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:16:32PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Well it shouldn't. There is definitely something wrong with setup and
downloads at the moment, but I haven't tracked it down yet.
What about the this page intentionally left blank report? Is that on
your list?
My
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:05:19AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
But those are social problems, not technical ones.
And ones I have little sympathy for. Setup is a technical tool, not a
social one. It's not aimed at being the best downloader, only the best
installer.
Could you maybe put it back and just randomly display it? I kind of
like the whimsy of such a thing.
Whaddaya think's going in the big white box?
Some part of this:
http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/logo-ideas/mclean-20020221-0940.png
maybe?
I like the cygwin C part.
cgf
Could you maybe put it back and just randomly display it? I kind of
like the whimsy of such a thing.
Whaddaya think's going in the big white box?
Some part of this:
http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/logo-ideas/mclean-20020221-0940.png
maybe?
I like the cygwin C part.
cgf
Ooh,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:31:17PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
The only thing I can think of to do is to get rid of latest/contrib and
move to something else, like 'release', with all of the current
directories located underneath.
You mean like:
cygwin/latest/zlib
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:40:06PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Ooh, that's kinda cool. The C kinda looks like a staple though, maybe a
little less pointiness.
Do you want to edit it? I doubt that the author (artist?) would mind.
Maybe rounding the corners would help.
cgf
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:40:06PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Ooh, that's kinda cool. The C kinda looks like a staple though, maybe a
little less pointiness.
Do you want to edit it? I doubt that the author (artist?) would mind.
Maybe rounding the corners would help.
Well, I do
Is the script for building setup.ini files from a directory hierarchy
available anywhere? I want to setup a test install directory with the
full hierarchy and setup.hint files.
Also, I ran into a problem with the xfree-fonts-100dpi and
xfree-fonts-75dpi packages. With a hand-generated
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:43:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
If it is upset I'll be upset.
It should be acceptable to have bin without source.
If it causes a problem, I'll fix it.
That's great. (I'm not planning on needlessly changing my packages, but
perhaps the next time they must be
Robert Collins wrote:
2) update bzip2 to the latest release -- which involves the grand
library split thing (bzip2 - bzip2 + libbz2_0).
However, the name
libbz2_0 is incompatible with the old setup, and even
'cygcheck -c'
gets confused prior to the cygwin-1.3.8 release.
But I didn't
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:53:17PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Once that box is deployed we should have some excess capacity for things
like rsync and maybe we can even allow downloads from
sources.redhat.com again.
But I thought the problem with sourceware has been (a) processing load
AND (b)
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:01:30PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Okay -- I'll upload it once I get home. (Especially as Chris is
advocating that the xfree folks use '_' in the names of their font
packages, as a NONseparator --- it's that '_' which causes the
incompatibility with the old
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:44 AM
I also have a friend who's working on and off on a web based
install, fwiw.
Is this to supplant/work with setup.exe, or is it unrelated? I'd look at
wrapping
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:13:33PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I also have a friend who's working on and off on a web based
install, fwiw.
Is this to supplant/work with setup.exe, or is it unrelated?
It's unrelated. It was an exercise in
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:13 PM
That won't help setup.ini-less installs much but, er...
... who cares?
Lol,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:19 PM
I don't think it's that big a deal to require cygwin packages
to follow
a parseable naming scheme; ours is pretty lenient...when it
fails, it's
not a terrible
Oooo, NOW I get it. I didn't understand that verpat: was a new
field in setup.hint, PARSED by upset. It's perfectly clear in hindsight.
Nevermind my earlier comments. Time for some sleep.
--Chuck
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:24:18PM -0400, Charles Wilson
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:42:04PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Oooo, NOW I get it. I didn't understand that verpat: was a new
field in setup.hint, PARSED by upset. It's perfectly clear in hindsight.
That's probably because, on rereading, my description didn't make that
clear.
Nevermind
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Name? Do you mean version? If you put a version in setup.hint it
is currently ignored.
The name from the @ line and the version header could be used to
override the parsing of file names into name and version.
- Ian
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:50:04PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Name? Do you mean version? If you put a version in setup.hint it is
currently ignored.
The name from the line and the version header could be used to
override the parsing of file names into name and
I finished making some xfree packages. They are distributed binary
archives repackaged as cygwin packages. I made a package directory that
can be used with setup.exe from a local directory and over the network.
I changed my mind about the division of the packages I proposed. I got
rid of the
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:40:46PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote:
I finished making some xfree packages. They are distributed binary
archives repackaged as cygwin packages. I made a package directory that
can be used with setup.exe from a local directory and over the network.
I changed my mind
-Original Message-
From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 3:11 PM
I hope that clarifies things.
This may actually be documented in the Porting Layer
Definition, but I don't remember for sure.
Yes it is sortof - some frameworks have defined
Dear Harold,
thank you for the reply. xdpyinfo shows that both named extensions are
present. Is there some possibility to trace where is the problem (some
debug mode for Xfree or so ?)
David
David,
Cygwin/XFree86 doesn't have OpenGL, it has Mesa.
You can run 'xdpyinfo' in
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:43:13PM +0200, David Komanek wrote:
Dear Harold,
thank you for the reply. xdpyinfo shows that both named extensions are
present. Is there some possibility to trace where is the problem (some
debug mode for Xfree or so ?)
David,
There is a sample program called
Dear Alan,
thanks for your comments/advices. I tried glxgears and it works. The gears
are not rotating fluent enough on my 800MHz pentium, but I don't expect
this is related to my problem.
I am able to start xterm, swmgr, toolchest connecting to SGI 6.5.14 box
which probably use classical X11
dgl error (protocol): remote machine not DGL capable - meda:10.0
dgl error (default init): default dglopen(meda:10.0,4) returned -13
Cygwin/XFree86 doesn't have the DGL extension. If you do an 'xdpyinfo'
on your SGI box, you'll probably see it.
Eh, I thought, DGL is SGI name for
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:47:58AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
2) I'm working on, I suspect it's a coordinate translation thing. I get
lovely background stipple but not (AFAICT solid fills).
Rob,
Take a look at wingc.c and set miTranslate to 0 (FALSE).
Alan.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:47:58AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Creating a single combined clipping region using CombineRgn will allow
you to move the for (iX= ..)loop from within the while (nbox--) loop,
thus saving multiple selectClipRgn+deleteObject + bitblt calls, which
may make the
I've made serious progress, but I'm having trouble with two things.
1) The mouse - I'm not getting any WM_MOUSEMOVE messages to the app
windows. Anyone seen this before?
2) I've broken fillspans for DRAWABLE_WINDOWs. I can fix it by drawing
into the root window hdc always,
but that's defeating
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:47:58AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Creating a single combined clipping region using CombineRgn will allow
you to move the for (iX= ..)loop from within the while (nbox--) loop,
thus saving multiple selectClipRgn+deleteObject + bitblt calls, which
may make the
David,
Just as a sanity check, you have run non OpenGL applications from your SGI
machine using Cygwin/XFree86, right? I mean, it wouldn't make much sense to
jump right into debugging complex applications if an xterm doesn't work
correctly.
Just let us know that you have in fact done this.
HTMLPREBODY BGCOLOR=#00FONT COLOR=#00 SIZE=3
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
IT'S COMING!!!
GET READY TO LOOSE WEIGHT
ANABOLIC WEIGHT LOSS
IN LESS THAN 10 DAYS OASIS WILL LAUNCH A NEW ROCKET !
THE WORLD'S FIRST ANABOLIC WEIGHT LOSS SYSTEM!
· A double blind, placebo controlled,
HTMLPREBODY BGCOLOR=#00FONT COLOR=#00 SIZE=3
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
IT'S COMING!!!
GET READY TO LOOSE WEIGHT
ANABOLIC WEIGHT LOSS
IN LESS THAN 10 DAYS OASIS WILL LAUNCH A NEW ROCKET !
THE WORLD'S FIRST ANABOLIC WEIGHT LOSS SYSTEM!
· A double blind, placebo controlled,
Hi all
I am using my CDE form a Solaris box on my local PC by ruining
xfree86 this is what I type
#xwin -noreset -screen 0 1152 864 -query server ip -from my pc
ip
And the fonts that I get are bold.
How do I change the font size, bold, not bold, different font etc.
Please help
Thanks in
HTMLPREBODY BGCOLOR=#00FONT COLOR=#00 SIZE=3
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
IT'S COMING!!!
GET READY TO LOOSE WEIGHT
ANABOLIC WEIGHT LOSS
IN LESS THAN 10 DAYS OASIS WILL LAUNCH A NEW ROCKET !
THE WORLD'S FIRST ANABOLIC WEIGHT LOSS SYSTEM!
· A double blind, placebo controlled,
HTMLPREBODY BGCOLOR=#00FONT COLOR=#00 SIZE=3
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
IT'S COMING!!!
GET READY TO LOOSE WEIGHT
ANABOLIC WEIGHT LOSS
IN LESS THAN 10 DAYS OASIS WILL LAUNCH A NEW ROCKET !
THE WORLD'S FIRST ANABOLIC WEIGHT LOSS SYSTEM!
· A double blind, placebo controlled,
All -
I have succesfully installed cygwin/xfree and when attempting to use XWin
with XDM for solaris even using the -fp tcp/box:7100, I get a creen that is
grey with a X as the cursor. Can anyone help on what I am doing wrong? I
have attached 2 snapshots
David S. Lee
Manager, Technical
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Yep, as Robert indicated, this has been possible for a while.
For Cygwin/XFree86, what I'd like to do is have you all come up with
a few .tar.bz2 files which install into a /usr/X11R6,
/etc/X11, etc.
I repackaged the current .tgz files as .tar.bz2 files. I
-Original Message-
From: Ian Burrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:49 AM
Is it possible to have multiple packages in a subdirectory and
setup.hint file? Or does each package needs its own directory?
Each package needs it's own directory.
For a
Robert Collins wrote:
I'm not clear not the hierarchy there - that reads like a list to me.
You've got two clauses you can independently use to make a hierarchy and
package dependencies - category:(i.e. the devel tarball belongs in
XFree86 and in Devel) and requires: (i.e. the server
-Original Message-
From: Ian Burrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:57 AM
That is a list of subdirectories. But it won't work since the each
package needs its own subdirectory. A better hiearchy would use the
components from the package names.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:56:36PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
I'm not clear not the hierarchy there - that reads like a list to me.
You've got two clauses you can independently use to make a hierarchy and
package dependencies - category:(i.e. the devel tarball belongs in
Robert Collins wrote:
They were simple changes to the script I wrote to repackage the
distributed archives. I'll try to write proper setup.hint
files for all
the packages.
Cool.
I'm unclear about how the -src packages (are/should be) handled, since
there are a great many binary
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:43:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
If it is upset I'll be upset.
It should be acceptable to have bin without source.
If it causes a problem, I'll fix it.
That's great. (I'm not planning on needlessly changing my packages, but
perhaps the next time they must be
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 06:34:29PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote:
Is the script for building setup.ini files from a directory hierarchy
available anywhere? I want to setup a test install directory with the
full hierarchy and setup.hint files.
Also, I ran into a problem with the xfree-fonts-100dpi
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:23 AM
Now, this works, and upset/setup are happy (every binary
package has a
src package) but it is hackish, ugly, and a pain to maintain. Is
there a better solution? (Or
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Yes, a -75dpi part of a tar file will look like a version number.
Can you use an underscore instead?
I could use an underscore. I got it to work by changing it to dpi75.
Shouldn't the name in the setup.ini file override that version number
parsing?
- Ian
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:19 PM
I don't think it's that big a deal to require cygwin packages
to follow
a parseable naming scheme; ours is pretty lenient...when it
fails, it's
not a terrible
Alan,
this may be of use to you: It's the region optimisation I mentioned
before. It seems a little faster to me, which indicates that some
(most?) of the calls have mulitple clip regions.
There's a little extra stuff for the rootless mode in win.h, but it
won't hurt to have that committed -
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:10:15PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Yes, a -75dpi part of a tar file will look like a version number.
Can you use an underscore instead?
I could use an underscore. I got it to work by changing it to dpi75.
Shouldn't the name in the setup.ini
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Name? Do you mean version? If you put a version in setup.hint it
is currently ignored.
The name from the @ line and the version header could be used to
override the parsing of file names into name and version.
- Ian
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:50:04PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Name? Do you mean version? If you put a version in setup.hint it is
currently ignored.
The name from the line and the version header could be used to
override the parsing of file names into name and
I finished making some xfree packages. They are distributed binary
archives repackaged as cygwin packages. I made a package directory that
can be used with setup.exe from a local directory and over the network.
I changed my mind about the division of the packages I proposed. I got
rid of the
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 5:14
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: ip.h
tcp.h
I think I understand now.
Previously I thought I only needed to provide the Log
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:07:25AM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 5:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ip.h tcp.h
I think I understand now.
Sorry. I misunderstood what Corinna told me. Thanks for fixing it for me.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 7:43 PM
To: Mark Bradshaw
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: patch: strptime
Sorry for disturbing you guys. But for the sake of saving all newbies from
my troubles, should we state clearly the requirements of ChangeLog? To say
the truth, I am still a little puzzled. The GNU ChangeLog Standards page
quoted on http://cygwin.com/contrib.html does not use any indentation at
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:15:16AM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote:
Sorry for disturbing you guys. But for the sake of saving all newbies
from my troubles, should we state clearly the requirements of
ChangeLog? To say the truth, I am still a little puzzled. The GNU
ChangeLog Standards page quoted on
I am absolutely certain about the correctness of the facts you mentioned. You are the authority here. However:
- Telling people to model is not enough. You yourself predicted my failure. Why not a better document? -- Of course, my statement is invalid if only one newbie (I) made mistakes. I
--- Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
Hi Markus,
I am using these distributions in my propriatory software:
Your proprietary software will need to have a GPL license if it uses any
library compiled with Cygwin1.dll dependencies. Your proprietary
--- Stanislav Sinyagin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, these are few Perl scripts that we use internally, and the documentation
written in DocBook XML. It's no way a software for sale, nor a package which
could be useful to anyone else, because it's really domain-specific.
Forgot to
Hi, I'm using cygwin 1.3.10 on Win95. When I ftp to
remote server, the user name prompt is bypassed and
I'm immediately prompted for password. This also
happens when I use GPG. I'm prompted to enter my
password confirmation without the prompt for the
password for the first time.
Hi,
OK. Better go to strace and cygcheck -s -r -v output. Perhaps it's
just a missing 'ntsec' setting in your CYGWIN environment variable?
No it's there ...
---
$ cygcheck -s -c -v | grep ntsec
CYGWIN = `tty ntsec'
---
A
review of pertinent areas of the User's Guide might prove
Hi all,
Using setup.exe, what files (if any) are generated during the installation
that are placed outside of the cygwin directory tree? Are these files used
by future invocations of setup.exe to find out information about the
current install?
The reason I ask is that a few of the other guys
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:08:03PM -0400, Ivan Dobrianov wrote:
Ok, I posted this question more than a year ago ... and the problem is
still present in the latest Cygwin builds:
tar xpvf myArchive.tar
will not restore read-only permissions, i.e. files with r-- perms will
If you're
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:02:50AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
Hey'all!
We're just getting ready for a new GNU Inetutils release, and I'm
trying my best to make sure that we run correctly on Cygwin. I can't
tell who's the maintainer of the package so that I can let (him/her)
know when the
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 03:09:43PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
We're just getting ready for a new GNU Inetutils release, and I'm
trying my best to make sure that we run correctly on Cygwin. I
can't tell who's the maintainer of the package so that I can let
(him/her) know when the
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Watford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Setup configuration files specific to an installation.
Hi all,
Using setup.exe, what files (if any) are generated during the
At 07:53 AM 4/9/2002, Ulrich Voss wrote:
Hi,
OK. Better go to strace and cygcheck -s -r -v output. Perhaps it's
just a missing 'ntsec' setting in your CYGWIN environment variable?
No it's there ...
---
$ cygcheck -s -c -v | grep ntsec
CYGWIN = `tty ntsec'
---
OK, what about my
Hello Dennis,
Tuesday, April 09, 2002, 6:52:37 AM, you wrote:
DM messages at all. In fact, if I ask to use gcc to link, it will even delete
DM the -o file if it already exists. I'm forced into using gcc to compile
DM only, then ld to link.
DM Any ideas about what could be causing this?
Just
In /src/tcl/tests on the CVS server there are two files, one named
iOUtil.test and the other ioUtil.tests. Notice the difference in the
capitalisation of the O. Although these two files can exist with separate
directory entries under case-insensitive file systems (most Unices), because
Windows
At 12:37 PM 4/9/2002, Chris January wrote:
In /src/tcl/tests on the CVS server there are two files, one named
iOUtil.test and the other ioUtil.tests. Notice the difference in the
capitalisation of the O. Although these two files can exist with separate
directory entries under case-insensitive
Hi,
I am running gcc-3.0.2 testsuite on latest cygwin (on my windows 2000
box). Most of my tests are running fine, but for few test directories, I
am not able to run any test and I am getting following error message. I
tried to look for it on web and could only understand that it has some
I've been trying to compile the latest cygwin, but I couldn't. I even tried
using the CVS version, but it didn't work too.
These is the error messages. Any clues ?
Best Regards,
Steve Howe
---
howe@ANGLA ~/cygwin-1.3.10-1/winsup/cygwin
$ make
g++ -c -gstabs+ -O2 -MMD
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 03:54:13PM -0300, Steve Howe wrote:
I've been trying to compile the latest cygwin, but I couldn't. I even tried
using the CVS version, but it didn't work too.
These is the error messages. Any clues ?
Search the mailing list archives.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info:
HTMLPREBODY BGCOLOR=#00FONT COLOR=#00 SIZE=3
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
IT'S COMING!!!
GET READY TO LOOSE WEIGHT
ANABOLIC WEIGHT LOSS
IN LESS THAN 10 DAYS OASIS WILL LAUNCH A NEW ROCKET !
THE WORLD'S FIRST ANABOLIC WEIGHT LOSS SYSTEM!
· A double blind, placebo controlled,
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
