Hi list,
I'm packaging mysql-4.0.17 (without server) for dependency to various
packages that I'll support, ie. mod_auth_mysql for the mysql based
HTTP basic authentication for Apache and the new PHP module.
Now I get into a question:
According how maintainers do, it seems that libraries, header
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi list,
I'm packaging mysql-4.0.17 (without server) for dependency to various
packages that I'll support, ie. mod_auth_mysql for the mysql based
HTTP basic authentication for Apache and the new PHP module.
Now I get into a question:
According how maintainers do, it seems that
Daniel Reed schrieb:
Package: joe 2.9.8-1 [2003-11-11]
Description: Fast and simple editor which emulates 5 other editors
Proposer: Jari Aalto
Proposal: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/joe/joe-2.9.8-1.tar.bz2
Daniel Reed wrote:
Package: ploticus 2.11-1 [2003-09-15]
Description: Command line driven tool to generates various plots and graphs
Proposer: Jari Aalto
Proposal: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00165.html
Daniel Reed schrieb:
ITP: tetrix [2003-09-10]
Description: ESR's curses-based version of Tetris
Proposer: Andrew B. Clegg
ITP: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00115.html
Status: ITP posted. Attained required 3 votes.
HOLD-UPS: No package, nothing to review!
Reini Urban wrote:
ITP: xemacs [2003-12-12]
Description: A powerful, highly customizable open source text editor
and application development system
Proposer: Dr. Volker Zell
ITP: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-12/msg00165.txt
Also: xemacs-sumo [XEmacs standard
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 11:39:43PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
This is great. Thanks for making a quick release to get this in. I
have repackaged the distcc package for Cygwin for this new release. Our
platform-specific patch now contains only our Cygwin README file and our
setup file;
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 11:39:43PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
This is great. Thanks for making a quick release to get this in. I
have repackaged the distcc package for Cygwin for this new release. Our
platform-specific patch now contains only our Cygwin README
Martin,
Martin Pool wrote:
distcc 2.12 is out. Thankyou to everyone who contributed patches,
suggestions, bug or success reports.
The changes in this release are not enormously exciting. If none of
the items below apply to you, there is no urgent need to upgrade.
distcc-2.12 Figgy Pudding
Some users have been reporting that they cannot get an XDMCP login
screen on a remote *nix box from their Windows XP machines.
I was unable to figure out what was going on here until I enabled the
Windows Internet Connection Firewall (ICF) for my notebook when I was
out of town. Upon
I'm going out on a limb here, as my experience with xfree86 is extremely
limited. Perhaps there is an option to achieve what I'm suggesting here.
Oh well! :-)
xwinclip is clobbering the clipboard when I work w/e.g. OpenOffice:
- If I copy and paste a spreadsheet cell while xwinclip is running,
yvind,
yvind Harboe wrote:
I'm going out on a limb here, as my experience with xfree86 is extremely
limited. Perhaps there is an option to achieve what I'm suggesting here.
Oh well! :-)
xwinclip is clobbering the clipboard when I work w/e.g. OpenOffice:
- If I copy and paste a spreadsheet cell
Sorry for the wrong info.
In my previous mail quoted below, all comment out
must be uncomment.
Additionally I made sure the following appears in
/opt/kde3/share/config/Xaccess and /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess:
# The nicest way to run the chooser is to just ask it to broadcast
# requests to
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of that patch.
The CVS log message says:
fixes for _XtInherit on cygwin.
The
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of that patch.
The CVS log message says:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of that patch.
The CVS
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Your commit didn't mention this either.
Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were
attributed to Ralf Habacker:
tsk, tsk: the actual commit on the code change bears only your name.
A casual reader of that commit (and of this
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Your commit didn't mention this either.
Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were
attributed to Ralf Habacker:
tsk, tsk: the actual commit on the code change bears only your name.
A casual reader of that
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
XFree86 should be taking care not to steal credit for our patches by
committing them without proper attribution.
your standards are inconsistent: your committing the change rather than
offering commit access to someone who solved a problem that
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
XFree86 should be taking care not to steal credit for our patches by
committing them without proper attribution.
your standards are inconsistent: your committing the change rather than
offering commit access to someone who
Do any developers need books? I've got enough money for one or two
books in the fund. If you have contributed at least one patch before
and you need a book on X, Win32 API, compilers, build tools, or
something else related to Cygwin/X development, then I can help you out
in getting the books
Do you actually do anything useful? Or do you just steal other people's
code and then act annoying (and childish) when someone calls you on it?
Argh. That was supposed to go to our good friend Thomas Dickey.
Somebody in Pittsburgh, PA stop by and slap me.
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Brian E. Gallew wrote:
Do you actually do anything useful? Or do you just steal other people's
code and then act annoying (and childish) when someone calls you on it?
You can see for yourself what he does:
http://invisible-island.net/
ftp://invisible-island.net/
Thomas,
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Your commit didn't mention this either.
Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were
attributed to Ralf Habacker:
tsk, tsk: the actual
On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 11:32, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
XFree86 should be taking care not to steal credit for our patches by
committing them without proper attribution.
your standards are inconsistent: your committing the change rather than
Thomas, as a casual observer of your behavior in respect to Harold, your last name
would describe you better if it were shortened to Dick.
Here is a Quote from Mr. Dickeys webpage where he is whining about not getting credit
for patches he wrote:
This is a collection of some of the patches
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the
ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author.
well that's polite enough.
unlike Harold.
no problem.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
No, that is not good enough. You should amend your change log entry to
attribute the patch to Ralf and you should apologize to the X community
at large for being so sloppy with attributing credit.
yes, you're right. now I'll have to scrutinize
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Put Ralf's name in the change log!!!
you first.
Ralf's name is already in our change log, but our change log is not in CVS.
I guess I need to show you that you actively took credit for the patch
again:
The
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the
ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author.
well that's polite enough.
unlike Harold.
I have not been rude in this discussion.
I have repeatedly asked you to
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:02:20PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf Habacker's patch and
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
No, that is not good enough. You should amend your change log entry to
attribute the patch to Ralf and you should apologize to the X community
at large for being so sloppy with attributing credit.
yes, you're right.
Thanks.
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:02:20PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Thomas,
If you did get this code directly from Cygwin/X's tree then I'd of
expected at least the credit to be apportioned to Harold at the very
least, rather than putting your name against it. Ralf's name could have
been corrected later, with a
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the
ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author.
well that's polite enough.
unlike Harold.
I have not been
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Thomas,
If you did get this code directly from Cygwin/X's tree then I'd of
expected at least the credit to be apportioned to Harold at the very
least, rather than putting your name against it. Ralf's name could have
been corrected
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the
ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author.
well that's polite enough.
unlike Harold.
I
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
I see only minor inconsitency on his part, that the original commit of
that code didn't attribute it to its author in the CVS logs, while at
least some other commits do note authors of patches. However, he didn't
explicitly take credit for it, like you
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
[snip]
announcement of new packages with those changes reflects the author
correctly. I don't see Harold Hunt asking for his name to be on the
patch in any way, only the patch's author's name (the members of the
Cygwin/X community in
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
been corrected later, with a follow email from Harold.
It's a simple change to put that right in the CHANGELOG. So I'll do that.
I had that on my next set of commits.
Then why not say so earlier?
There was no point in doing so.
--
Thomas
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
a lot of words.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
been corrected later, with a follow email from Harold.
It's a simple change to put that right in the CHANGELOG. So I'll do that.
I had that on my next set of commits.
Then why not say so earlier?
There was no point in doing
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
a lot of words.
The modus operandi of Thomas Dickey:
1) Stick head in sand
2) ???
Harold
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Sure there was: you would not have exposed yourself as a hypocrite by
doing exactly that which you denounce on your home page (pointed out by
Daniel Armburst). You lambast those egotistical plagiarists that
yes, I can imagine that you admire them.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 05:34:46PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Sure there was: you would not have exposed yourself as a hypocrite by
doing exactly that which you denounce on your home page (pointed out by
Daniel Armburst). You lambast those egotistical
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote:
I've seen your postings before, and have no use for your opinions.
(that seems to be a common trait of Harold's friends - I don't have to
address each one of them).
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:25:52PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of
Wow, your still so pissed off about being wrong, now you are attacking all of Harold's
friends. Boy, you're a big powerful man. Let me bow before you.
#1. I do not know Harold. All I know about him is what I have learned by following
this list for about a year.
#2. I don't know you. All I
I didn't follow all of the discussion and I am not a friend of Harold,
but I would be happy to become his friend in the future. Harold seems to
be a really nice guy spending his free time on the Cygwin X development.
Dickey seems to be a really dick as somebody already noted, or a really
dangerous
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Alec Mihailovs wrote:
I didn't follow all of the discussion and I am not a friend
of Harold, but I would be happy to become his friend in the
future. Harold seems to be a really nice guy spending his
free time on the Cygwin X development.
Agreed.
Dickey seems to be a
Our screenshots page has been completely updated:
http://xfree86.cygwin.com/screenshots/
Nine old screenshots have been removed.
Nine new screenshots have been added, showing off new features such as
the exit confirmation and the tray icon menu.
Merry Christmas!
Harold
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-23 16:26:31
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog Makefile.in acconfig.h bsdlib.cc
config.h.in configure configure.in cygtls.h
cygwin.din
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-23 16:43:46
Added files:
winsup/cygwin : cygtls.cc
Log message:
add missing file
Patches:
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-23 22:24:38
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog fork.cc
Log message:
* fork.cc (fork_child): After a pthread/fork, ensure that impure pointer stuff
which resides in parent
CVSROOT:/cvs/uberbaum
Module name:winsup
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-24 04:37:20
Modified files:
testsuite : ChangeLog
testsuite/winsup.api/pthread: rwlock7.c
Log message:
* winsup.api/pthread/rwlock7.c (main): Don't assume that
Hello,
I'm encountering a problem while trying to install Cygwin on a Window XP box
from a local directory of packages. Several times during the setup
procedure, Windows pops up an error message informing me that the Windows
find.exe utility has encountered a problem and needs to be closed.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 04:04:11PM -0700, Blair P. Houghton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In the meantime I realized that 5.8.2 is newer than I
thought it was. Maybe I *am* the first to try to build
it on cygwin. Nah. Someone out there has seen this
before.
Works for me. Please give output
I am still not able to build Cygwin from the latest CVS sources...
But anyway, that's only a part of the problem. My boss wants to be sure
there is no malicious code in the Cygwin distribution I use.
So he's telling me to rebuild it from scratch from the CVS sources.
His logic is that since we can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shankar Unni wrote:
| It's not unexpected or incorrect, but may be suboptimal.
|
| The Java runtime insists that InetAddress.getLocalHost() return your
| true IP address, not 127.0.0.1. Unfortunately, in a dialup setup with
| automatic connection, such
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 11:57:59AM +0100, Gabriel SOUBIES wrote:
I am still not able to build Cygwin from the latest CVS sources...
But anyway, that's only a part of the problem. My boss wants to be sure
there is no malicious code in the Cygwin distribution I use.
So he's telling me to rebuild it
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:22:10PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 02:31:40PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
At least here rxvt dies after started. cmd.exe works. Latest
Cygwin packages on XP Professional SP1 + all updates.
As luck would have it, this is due to a
Ahh. The old chicken and egg problem.
Normally the way to resolve this issue is to use a cross compiler. However,
even then you still have to start off with a binary application, just on
another platform. For example, you could use gcc running under Linux. But
how do you verify the Linux
Steve Coleman wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Hi all,
in my attempts to fix an ugly bug in kaffe on Cygwin, the bug I'm
trying to squish turned out to be triggered by something that happens
*before* main is called.
snip
Since I'd like to know what modifes that opcode, I
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Steve Coleman wrote:
I have seen something like this before. If it is a C++ app then it may
be a constructor in a statically or golbally declared object instance.
The compiler should generate code to call all the global object
constructors for
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 18:23, Dalibor Topic wrote:
in my attempts to fix an ugly bug in kaffe on Cygwin, the bug I'm
trying to squish turned out to be triggered by something that happens
*before* main is called.
you can set a breakpoint at the application entry point.
$ gdb /bin/bash
It seems that a few months ago the man pages were showing the ESC[1m etc. escape
sequences in a bash shell. The problem was quickly fixed.
I downloaded docbook_xsl 1.64.1-1 yesterday and the problem is back. I also
downloaded a few X-modules. One of these modules caused the 'man' problem to
Great news !!!
I am no longer getting a stackdump (using rsync + ssh) with the latest
snapshot: cygwin-inst-20031223.tar.bz2.
Thanks for your work.
-Steve More
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL
Hi all,
New version freezes frequently (3-5 times during a day). I haven't
pinpointed any obvious reason. cygcheck report is in the attachment.
Help would be appreciated.
Thx,
/'^'\
( o o )
-oOOO--(_)--OOOo-
|Domagoj
Christopher Faylor wrote:
But, then, why should your boss trust me to be giving you the right
information? I might be maliciously steering you towards corrupted code
which was specially intended to subvert your security...
What he's not saying here is that secretly he has committed the
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:24:37PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great news !!!
I am no longer getting a stackdump (using rsync + ssh) with the latest
snapshot: cygwin-inst-20031223.tar.bz2.
That is great news. I made so many changes in the last snapshot that
it's hard to remember where
The subject says it all.
I'm hoping to release cygwin 1.5.6 shortly after Christmas.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
The subject says it all.
I'm hoping to release cygwin 1.5.6 shortly after Christmas.
Have you run the testsuite lately? I get a heap of failures on NT4. But,
in that timeframe, I certainly won't have time to look at them.
lots of child process
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 04:39:13PM -0600, Brian Ford wrote:
Have you run the testsuite lately? I get a heap of failures on NT4.
But, in that timeframe, I certainly won't have time to look at them.
You can safely assume that cygwin is not released without my running the
test suite.
I haven't run
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 04:39:13PM -0600, Brian Ford wrote:
Have you run the testsuite lately? I get a heap of failures on NT4.
But, in that timeframe, I certainly won't have time to look at them.
You can safely assume that cygwin is not
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 04:45:27PM -0600, Brian Ford wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 04:39:13PM -0600, Brian Ford wrote:
Have you run the testsuite lately? I get a heap of failures on NT4.
But, in that timeframe, I certainly won't have time to
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:22:10PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 02:31:40PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
At least here rxvt dies after started. cmd.exe works. Latest
Cygwin packages on XP Professional SP1 + all
All I get is undefined errors.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Roy Clemmons
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 9:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Access Violation
Greetings,
I have installed expat-1.95.7 into Cygwin 1.5.5-1 using the
I saw your email address on your work and assumed you
took an interest in supporting it. Mea culpa.
Hey, that's what you get for putting them in there,
was a josh about just the sort of complaint you replied
with. I saw you coming, and warned you, but you showed
up anyway. Tua culpa.
You
79 matches
Mail list logo
