Re: RFU: cppcheck-1.50-1

2011-08-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 15 00:58, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: Please upload: --- wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=1 \ http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/cppcheck/cppcheck-1.50-1.tar.bz2 \ http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/cppcheck/cppcheck-1.50-1-src.tar.bz2 --- Please leave 1.49-1 as previous and feel free to remove

Re: GCC dependencies (attn David Billinghurst)

2011-08-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 14 23:03, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 14:29 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 16:11 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: BTW, for those interested, I'm already working on updating the Fedora Cygwin toolchain to match the recent binutils/gdb

Re: GCC dependencies (attn David Billinghurst)

2011-08-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 15 01:01, Peter Rosin wrote: Den 2011-08-14 13:20 skrev Corinna Vinschen: On Aug 13 18:20, Peter Rosin wrote: Den 2011-08-13 13:28 skrev Corinna Vinschen: here's a minor nit, but that bugs me for a while now. $ cc hello.c $ ./a.out bash: ./a.out: No such file or

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On 8/12/2011 3:12 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Turns out, 256 is too big for the splash screen. Looking for a nice size, I found that 1064, the size of the rasterized original icon, dived by 7 is 152, which looks like the ideal size for the dialog icon. So I added a 152x152 icon to cygwin.ico,

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On 8/14/2011 5:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Aug 14 09:18, Andy Koppe wrote: On 27 July 2011 18:30, Warren Young wrote: - Do we need more sizes? I've seen reference to odd sizes like 64x64 and 96x96, but surely we can trust Vista+ to scale the 256x256 to these sizes without needing

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-15 Thread Charles Wilson
On 8/15/2011 10:33 AM, Warren Young wrote: The hard edges in the original art are causing stair-stepping when doing a direct downsample, though. (Look at the pointy bits.) By blurring the high-res version and then downsampling by a non-integral amount, you can get a much smoother result.

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 15 08:33, Warren Young wrote: On 8/12/2011 3:12 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Turns out, 256 is too big for the splash screen. Looking for a nice size, I found that 1064, the size of the rasterized original icon, dived by 7 is 152, which looks like the ideal size for the dialog icon.

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 15 11:44, Charles Wilson wrote: On 8/15/2011 10:33 AM, Warren Young wrote: The hard edges in the original art are causing stair-stepping when doing a direct downsample, though. (Look at the pointy bits.) By blurring the high-res version and then downsampling by a non-integral

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 15 08:44, Warren Young wrote: On 8/14/2011 5:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: You're saving 12K or so. Given that we already have the icons, is it worth it to delete them for just a few K? Are you calculating the setup.exe size delta after upx, or are you looking at the .ico file?

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On 8/12/2011 12:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Aug 11 15:06, Warren Young wrote: I haven't forgotten about my attempt, by the way. It's just become a bigger project than anticipated. I guess you're not waiting on me, which is fine. No, no, I'm curious. I present to you now, my magnum

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-15 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 15/08/2011 1:52 PM, Warren Young wrote: I present to you now, my magnum opus: http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/logo/boxed-hippo.ico Now *that*, my friends, is an angry hippo. When I try to grab the file I get an error stating it's malformed. Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe ir0nh...@gmail.com

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On 8/15/2011 9:44 AM, Charles Wilson wrote: On 8/15/2011 10:33 AM, Warren Young wrote: The hard edges in the original art are causing stair-stepping when doing a direct downsample, though. (Look at the pointy bits.) By blurring the high-res version and then downsampling by a non-integral

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On 8/15/2011 11:58 AM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: On 15/08/2011 1:52 PM, Warren Young wrote: I present to you now, my magnum opus: http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/logo/boxed-hippo.ico Now *that*, my friends, is an angry hippo. When I try to grab the file I get an error stating it's malformed.

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-15 Thread Charles Wilson
On 8/15/2011 11:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Are you talking about recent gimp versions? I wasn't talking specifically about any GIMP version -- I was surmising based on what you guys described as GIMP's behavior. In my gimp I have the choice of four different interpolation algorithms,

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-15 Thread Andy Koppe
On 15 August 2011 18:52, Warren Young wrote: I present to you now, my magnum opus:        http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/logo/boxed-hippo.ico Now *that*, my friends, is an angry hippo. :) That is rather impressive, and yep, that's not a happy hippo. Is this just for fun or are you proposing

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On 8/15/2011 1:52 PM, Andy Koppe wrote: On 15 August 2011 18:52, Warren Young wrote: I present to you now, my magnum opus: http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/logo/boxed-hippo.ico Now *that*, my friends, is an angry hippo. :) That is rather impressive, and yep, that's not a happy hippo. Is

Re: AltGr key mostly fires an additional CONTROL key

2011-08-15 Thread Oliver Schmidt
Hi, I also had problems with the AltGr key. These could reliably be reproduced by holding the AltGr for some seconds (causing Windows generating auto repeat events). Unfortunately the test version at ftp://cygwin.com/pub/cygwinx/XWin.20110801-git-2d9f9305cb559907.exe.bz2 doesn't fix this

src/winsup/cygwin ChangeLog pipe.cc

2011-08-15 Thread corinna
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: cori...@sourceware.org 2011-08-15 16:05:13 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog pipe.cc Log message: * pipe.cc (pipe): Just call _pipe with O_BINARY mode. Move code to generate normalized pathnames from

Re: Cygwin 1.7.9 Apache2 startup question issue.

2011-08-15 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Brian Wilson! I'm having a bit of trouble with starting the Cygwin Apache2 package on my Windows XP (SP3) system. Why don't you use native Windows Apache HTTPD server? One last question. Why does the apachectl2 help message display the usage for httpd2; Because the syntax is

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cppcheck-1.50-1

2011-08-15 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Version 1.50-1 of cppcheck has been uploaded, following the upstream release. cppcheck is a tool for static C/C++ code analysis. It tries to detect bugs that your C/C++ compiler doesn't see. The goal is no false positives. cppcheck is versatile. You can check non-standard code that includes

teTeX/dvips

2011-08-15 Thread Charles Hyder
Hi! I've just upgraded to a fresh Cygwin distribution. I installed the full teTeX package. Then I tried to add my usual stuff like extra TeX packages that I had with my previous installation of Cygwin. (Yes, I have read that the problems with 3rd party packages are not welcome here, but 1) I

Re: Cygwin 1.7.9 Apache2 startup question issue.

2011-08-15 Thread Brian Wilson
Hello Andrey: I'm having a bit of trouble with starting the Cygwin Apache2 package on my Windows XP (SP3) system. Why don't you use native Windows Apache HTTPD server? Because I'd like to use a more *nix like environment than Windows. ...Why does the apachectl2 help message display

Re: Cygwin 1.7.9 Apache2 startup question issue.

2011-08-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:18:34AM -0400, Brian Wilson wrote: Hello Andrey: I'm having a bit of trouble with starting the Cygwin Apache2 package on my Windows XP (SP3) system. Why don't you use native Windows Apache HTTPD server? Because I'd like to use a more *nix like environment than

Re: Problem

2011-08-15 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 8/13/2011 5:00 PM, John Dzielski wrote: I have cygwin installed on a VMWare VM running Windows 7 on a Mac running OSX 10.6. I am unable to get name resolution to work with ssh. The command ssh X returns the error ssh: could not resolve hostname X: Non-recoverable failure in name resolution.

Re: rxvt emacs runs, but bash and others fail with STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION

2011-08-15 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 8/14/2011 1:31 PM, David M. Karr wrote: I'm now in a situation where rxvt and Emacs runs, but the bash that rxvt runs fails with something like this: David, try running rebaseall. -- Larry _ A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A:

Re: Problem

2011-08-15 Thread John Dzielski
Larry, I submitted a later post where I found that the problem occurs when the VM networking mode is NAT. Okay with bridged. I've submitted a support request to VMware. John. On 8/15/11 12:56 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: On 8/13/2011 5:00 PM, John Dzielski wrote: I have cygwin

Re: Problem

2011-08-15 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 8/15/2011 1:03 PM, John Dzielski wrote: Larry, I submitted a later post where I found that the problem occurs when the VM networking mode is NAT. Okay with bridged. I've submitted a support request to VMware. John. Yep, I noticed afterwards. Bad threading on the part of my email

Re: SSHD Issue Windows 2003 64 bit

2011-08-15 Thread Gary
Any ideas? On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Gary gary.mphe...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah that was a typo.. So my /etc/passwd /etc/group file both have the SYSTEM in them: SYSTEM:S-1-5-18:18: - Group SYSTEM:*:18:544:,S-1-5-18:: - passwd Whenever I run 'ssh-host-config' I receive no echo from the

Re: SSHD Issue Windows 2003 64 bit

2011-08-15 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 8/15/2011 5:11 PM, Gary wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Garygary.mphelps wrote: Yeah that was a typo.. So my /etc/passwd /etc/group file both have the SYSTEM in them: SYSTEM:S-1-5-18:18: - Group SYSTEM:*:18:544:,S-1-5-18:: - passwd Whenever I run 'ssh-host-config' I receive no

Re: sshd on win7 x64

2011-08-15 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 8/12/2011 11:49 AM, Alexey Luchko wrote: Hi! I've got back and tried to set up sshd again. Now it tricks me in other way. It fails on seteuid() when I try to connect with a domain user. $ /usr/sbin/sshd.exe -dd snip debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 11135/10513 (e=1003/513) seteuid 11135:

Re: failure notice

2011-08-15 Thread Gary
Yup, that's the output I get on my 32-bit windows machine, I'm not seeing any value in environment for 'TERM'. Are you referring to PATH? %SystemRoot%\system32;%SystemRoot%;%SystemRoot%\System32\Wbem;c:\cygwin\bin;c:\cygwin\usr\bin;c:\cygwin\sbin;c:\cygwin\usr\sbin;C:\Program Files

Re: SSHD Issue Windows 2003 64 bit

2011-08-15 Thread Gary
Yup, that's the output I get on my 32-bit windows machine, I'm not seeing any value in environment for 'TERM'. Are you referring to PATH? %SystemRoot%\system32;%SystemRoot%;%SystemRoot%\System32\Wbem;c:\cygwin\bin;c:\cygwin\usr\bin;c:\cygwin\sbin;c:\cygwin\usr\sbin;C:\Program Files

Re: rxvt emacs runs, but bash and others fail with STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION

2011-08-15 Thread David M. Karr
On 8/15/2011 10:01 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: On 8/14/2011 1:31 PM, David M. Karr wrote: I'm now in a situation where rxvt and Emacs runs, but the bash that rxvt runs fails with something like this: David, try running rebaseall. I should have known. Working again. Thanks. -- Problem

Re: SSHD Issue Windows 2003 64 bit

2011-08-15 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 8/15/2011 7:11 PM, Gary wrote: Yup, that's the output I get on my 32-bit windows machine, I'm not seeing any value in environment for 'TERM'. This should be set to cygwin if you're running from 'cygwin.bat'. Are you referring to PATH?

gdb warning: (Internal error

2011-08-15 Thread Marco atzeri
Hi, I am trying to debug a crash bug in octave, and I am puzzled by the backtrace output #0 popen ( command=0x208195d4 /usr/bin/gs -dQUIET -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -sDEVICE=png16m -dTextAlphaBits=4 -dGraphicsAlphaBits=4 -r150x150 -dEPSCrop -sOutputFile=gnuplot.png -, in_type=0x9a45add w)

Updated: cppcheck-1.50-1

2011-08-15 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Version 1.50-1 of cppcheck has been uploaded, following the upstream release. cppcheck is a tool for static C/C++ code analysis. It tries to detect bugs that your C/C++ compiler doesn't see. The goal is no false positives. cppcheck is versatile. You can check non-standard code that includes