Re: cygwinX xwin resolution

On 7/22/2016 6:19 PM, Dr. Rob Higgins wrote: Ahhh ... a totally separate platform has the same issue on this hi-res small screen. This laptop is new and Band-In-A-Box needs Windows or Mac, so I'm testing Win 10 with cygwin X to get some of the stuff I'm used to in Linux. When testing

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

On 7/22/16, 12:57 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: >On 22/07/2016 19:58, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: >>> winfsp-fuse is a reasonable name. >>> dokan-fuse also (IMHO) >> >> In the interest of moving things forward, I am happy to rename the >> package. Is it possible for a package with a name winfsp-fuse to

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

On 7/22/16, 12:56 PM, Adrien JUND wrote: >For information on your last release: curl -u "username" >https://api.github.com/repos/billziss-gh/winfsp/releases >=> winfsp-0.14.16197.msi - "download_count": 24 This is beginning to feel a bit weird. You seem to be rather obsessed with how many users

Re: cygwinX xwin resolution

Ahhh ... a totally separate platform has the same issue on this hi-res small screen. This laptop is new and Band-In-A-Box needs Windows or Mac, so I'm testing Win 10 with cygwin X to get some of the stuff I'm used to in Linux. When testing Freeplane with Java 8 (in the Win 10 environment) and

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mintty 2.4.1

I have uploaded mintty 2.4.1 with the following changes: Window handling: * Tweak and guard DPI change handling (#566, #470). Text display: * Combined enhancement for rendering of combined characters (#565). * Enforce font selection at uniform size, to ensure using bold font. * Restored

Updated: mintty 2.4.1

I have uploaded mintty 2.4.1 with the following changes: Window handling: * Tweak and guard DPI change handling (#566, #470). Text display: * Combined enhancement for rendering of combined characters (#565). * Enforce font selection at uniform size, to ensure using bold font. * Restored

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

On 22/07/2016 19:58, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: winfsp-fuse is a reasonable name. dokan-fuse also (IMHO) In the interest of moving things forward, I am happy to rename the package. Is it possible for a package with a name winfsp-fuse to satisfy a “fuse” dependency? Bill It is not clear to

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

Take a step back, Bill :) Here I am only concerned about a non-official fuse project "fuse" willing to use the fuse name and that would fool cygwin users. Since I never tested your solution, I only reuse your own sentence from dokan Google groups/reddit but if you continue to say that I spread

Re: cygwinX xwin resolution

Maybe someone suggested this but your major problem may be that you need to modify your font path to use higher res fonts, see xset(1) but I use something like (cut+paste, dejavu and misc are irrelevant but for pedagological sake): xset fp+

[ANNOUNCEMENT] units 2.13-1

The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * units-2.13-1 The Units program converts quantities expressed in various scales to their equivalents in other scales. The units program can handle multiplicative scale changes as well as nonlinear conversions such as

units 2.13-1

The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * units-2.13-1 The Units program converts quantities expressed in various scales to their equivalents in other scales. The units program can handle multiplicative scale changes as well as nonlinear conversions such as

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

>winfsp-fuse is a reasonable name. >dokan-fuse also (IMHO) In the interest of moving things forward, I am happy to rename the package. Is it possible for a package with a name winfsp-fuse to satisfy a “fuse” dependency? Bill

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

On 7/22/16, 12:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Jul 21 22:11, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: >> On 7/20/16, 1:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> >We just might still want to change the name to "no+body". >> > >> >What do others on this list think? What sounds better? >> > >> > "nodomain+nobody"

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

On 7/22/16, 4:59 AM, Adrien JUND wrote: >The package should be renamed winfsp-fuse for give ability of cygwin >users to choose which solution they would like to use. Like >dokan-fuse, cbfs-fuse and other projects that offer the same >service... I am not opposed to renaming the package if that’s

[ANNOUNCEMENT] php 5.6.24-1

The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * php-5.6.24-1 * php-devel-5.6.24-1 * httpd-mod_php5-5.6.24-1 * php-bcmath-5.6.24-1 * php-bz2-5.6.24-1 * php-calendar-5.6.24-1 * php-ctype-5.6.24-1 * php-curl-5.6.24-1 * php-dba-5.6.24-1 * php-enchant-5.6.24-1 *

php 5.6.24-1

The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * php-5.6.24-1 * php-devel-5.6.24-1 * httpd-mod_php5-5.6.24-1 * php-bcmath-5.6.24-1 * php-bz2-5.6.24-1 * php-calendar-5.6.24-1 * php-ctype-5.6.24-1 * php-curl-5.6.24-1 * php-dba-5.6.24-1 * php-enchant-5.6.24-1 *

httpd 2.4.23-1

The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * httpd-2.4.23-1 * httpd-devel-2.4.23-1 * httpd-manual-2.4.23-1 * httpd-tools-2.4.23-1 * httpd-mod_http2-2.4.23-1 * httpd-mod_ldap-2.4.23-1 * httpd-mod_lua-2.4.23-1 * httpd-mod_proxy_html-2.4.23-1 * httpd-mod_ssl-2.4.23-1 The

[ANNOUNCEMENT] httpd 2.4.23-1

The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * httpd-2.4.23-1 * httpd-devel-2.4.23-1 * httpd-manual-2.4.23-1 * httpd-tools-2.4.23-1 * httpd-mod_http2-2.4.23-1 * httpd-mod_ldap-2.4.23-1 * httpd-mod_lua-2.4.23-1 * httpd-mod_proxy_html-2.4.23-1 * httpd-mod_ssl-2.4.23-1 The

djgpp-gcc 5.4.0-1

The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * djgpp-gcc-core-5.4.0-1 * djgpp-gcc-g++-5.4.0-1 * djgpp-gcc-fortran-5.4.0-1 * djgpp-gcc-objc-5.4.0-1 * djgpp-gcc-objc++-5.4.0-1 * djgpp-gcc-ada-5.4.0-1 The GNU Compiler Collection includes front ends for C, C++, Objective-C,

[ANNOUNCEMENT] djgpp-gcc 5.4.0-1

The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * djgpp-gcc-core-5.4.0-1 * djgpp-gcc-g++-5.4.0-1 * djgpp-gcc-fortran-5.4.0-1 * djgpp-gcc-objc-5.4.0-1 * djgpp-gcc-objc++-5.4.0-1 * djgpp-gcc-ada-5.4.0-1 The GNU Compiler Collection includes front ends for C, C++, Objective-C,

Re: cygwinX xwin resolution

Having now seen Jon's message ... Yes, my XWin log shows a dpi of 192, which is 7576 / 39.37 (inches per meter), rounded. As I mentioned, it is clear the XWin itself has a notion of resolution, but most applications do not seem to be coded to take it into account. The main ones that I use

Re: cygwinX xwin resolution

On 7/22/2016 12:23 AM, Dr. Rob Higgins wrote: I cannot find, after two days, any documentation on how and where to specify resolution parameters. I must be barking up the wrong trees. My laptop under Windows has recommended resolution set at 3200 x 1800 CygwinX X Windows are much to small,

Re: cygwinX xwin resolution

On 22/07/2016 05:23, Dr. Rob Higgins wrote: I cannot find, after two days, any documentation on how and where to specify resolution parameters. I must be barking up the wrong trees. My laptop under Windows has recommended resolution set at 3200 x 1800 CygwinX X Windows are much to small, and

Re: SIGSEGV in XopenDisplay in Cygwin64 X11

On 21/07/2016 17:25, John Watts wrote: cygcheck.out [...] gamin 0.1.10-15OK gawk4.1.3-1 OK gdb 7.10.1-1 OK [...]

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

On 22/07/2016 14:30, Adrien JUND wrote: Hi, Here is Liryna from Dokan-dev community, our project Dokany have the same purpose of Bill project. Like WinFSP, it is able to mount FUSE filesystem on cygwin before WinFSP exist. I would like to point out that naming WinFSP package "fuse" is not the

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

Hi, Here is Liryna from Dokan-dev community, our project Dokany have the same purpose of Bill project. Like WinFSP, it is able to mount FUSE filesystem on cygwin before WinFSP exist. I would like to point out that naming WinFSP package "fuse" is not the right way to integrate WinFSP in cygwin.

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

Hi, Here is Liryna from Dokan-dev community, our project Dokany have the same purpose of Bill project. Like WinFSP, it is able to mount FUSE filesystem on cygwin before WinFSP exist. I would like to point out that naming WinFSP package "fuse" is not the good way to integrate WinFSP in cygwin.

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

On Jul 21 22:11, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: > On 7/20/16, 1:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >We just might still want to change the name to "no+body". > > > >What do others on this list think? What sounds better? > > > > "nodomain+nobody" or "no+body" > > Corinna, hi. > > I know you have

[newlib-cygwin] Change "nodomain+nobody" to "no+body"

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;h=25cb82a55ebdc42005198a670830897ed39e6330 commit 25cb82a55ebdc42005198a670830897ed39e6330 Author: Corinna Vinschen Date: Fri Jul 22 09:41:23 2016 +0200 Change "nodomain+nobody" to "no+body" Per

[ANNOUNCEMENT] inkscape 0.91-5

The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * inkscape-0.91-5 Inkscape is an open source drawing tool that uses the W3C standard scalable vector graphics format (SVG). Some supported SVG features include basic shapes, paths, text, markers, clones, alpha blending,

inkscape 0.91-5

The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * inkscape-0.91-5 Inkscape is an open source drawing tool that uses the W3C standard scalable vector graphics format (SVG). Some supported SVG features include basic shapes, paths, text, markers, clones, alpha blending,